Suppose an economy is initially in equilibrium at its potential output level. As a result of an unexpected crisis in the financial markets, the AD curve suddenly shift to the left by a horizontal distance equal to $140 billion. Suppose the government wants to combat the resulting recession by increasing its spending. Assuming the marginal propensity to consume in this economy is 0.25, by how much must the government increase its spending to restore the economy to its initial level of output? (You can ignore the fact that the government must somehow finance the resulting budget deficit.) (Calculate your answer in billions of CAD, round it to one decimal places, and write it without units. E.g., write 1.0 for $1 billion.)

Suppose an economy is initially in equilibrium at its potential output level. As a result of an unexpected crisis in the financial markets, the AD curve suddenly shift to the left by a horizontal distance equal to $140 billion. Suppose the government wants to combat the resulting recession by increasing its spending. Assuming the marginal propensity to consume in this economy is 0.25, by how much must the government increase its spending to restore the economy to its initial level of output? (You can ignore the fact that the government must somehow finance the resulting budget deficit.) (Calculate your answer in billions of CAD, round it to one decimal places, and write it without units. E.g., write 1.0 for $1 billion.)

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter21: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose a closed economy with no government spending which in equilibrium is producing an output and income of 2250. Suppose also that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, and that, if at full employment, the economy would produce an output and income of 3050 By how much would the government need to cut taxes (T) to bring the economy to full employment?
Assume that a hypothetical economy with an MPC of 0.8 is experiencing severe recession. A) By how much would government spending have to rise to shift the aggreagte demand curve rightward by $ 25 billion? How large a tax cut would be needed to achieve the same increase in aghregate demand? Instructions: Round your answer to 2 decimal places and enter your answer as a positive number. Tax cut= ? (billion) B) Determine one possible combination of government spending increases and tax increases that would accomplish the same goal without changing the amount of outstanding debt. Increase government spending by (?) billion. Increase taxes by (?) billion.
Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. If the government decreases spending by Ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output? If the government decreases taxes by Ksh 500 billion, what is the change in (ii) output? If the government decreases transfer payments by ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output If the government decreases spending by ksh 500 billion and at the same time decreases taxes by ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output?
Suppose economists observe that an increase in government spending of $14 billion raises the total demand for goods and services by $42 billion. If these economists ignore the possibility of crowding out, they would estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to be . Now suppose the economists allow for crowding out. Their new estimate of the MPC would be than their initial one.
If the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, byhow much would government spending have to rise toincrease output by $1,000 billion? By how muchwould taxes need to decrease to increase output by$1,000 billion?
What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $75,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75. $ What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $75,000? Assume the MPC has not changed. $ An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in an identical eventual effect on real GDP. no change to real GDP. a larger eventual effect on real GDP. a smaller eventual effect on real GDP.