Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $120 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? $ billion

Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $120 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? $ billion

ECON MACRO

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337000529

Author:William A. McEachern

Publisher:William A. McEachern

Chapter11: Fiscal Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Suppose that the government of Uplandia is experiencing a large budget deficit with fixed government expenditures of G=375 and fixed taxes of T= 225. Assume that consumers of Uplandia behave as described in the following consumption function C = 450 + 0.96 (Y - T). Suppose further that investment spending is fixed at 300. a. Calculate the equilibrium level of GDP in Uplandia. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S. b. Next, assume that the National Congress in Uplandia succeeds in reducing taxes by 89 to a new fixed level of 136. Recalculate the equilibrium level of GDP using the tax multiplier c. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S after the tax cut and check to ensure that the multiplier worked.
14 If government spending and taxes both change by the same amount, how much must they change to eliminate the recessionary gap? 15. Suppose the MPC is .90 and the MPI is .10. If govern- ment expenditures go up $100 billion while taxes fall
Use the following information to answer questions 1, 2, and 3. Suppose that the government of Uplandia is experiencing a large budget deficit with fixed government expenditures of G=375 and fixed taxes of T= 225. Assume that consumers of Uplandia behave as described in the following consumption function: C = 450 + 0.96 (Y - T) Suppose further that investment spending is fixed at 300. 1. Calculate the equilibrium level of GDP in Uplandia. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S. 2. Next, assume that the National Congress in Uplandia succeeds in reducing taxes by 89 to a new fixed level of 136. Recalculate the equilibrium level of GDP using the tax multiplier. 3. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S after the tax cut and check to ensure that the multiplier worked.
Suppose that the government of Ansonia is experiencing a large budget deficit with fixed government expenditures of G=250 and fixed taxes of T=150. Assume that consumers of Ansonia behave as described in the following consumption function: C=300+0.8(Y−T) Suppose further that investment spending is fixed at 200. Calculate the equilibrium level of GDP in Ansonia. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S. Next, assume that the Republican Congress in Ansonia succeeds in reducing taxes by 30 to a new fixed level of 120. Recalculate the equilibrium level of GDP using the tax multiplier. Solve for equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S after the tax cut and check to ensure that the multiplier worked. What arguments are likely to be used in support of such a tax cut? What arguments might be used to oppose such a tax cut? Thank you sososooo much!
Suppose a closed economy with no government spending which in equilibrium is producing an output and income of 2500. Suppose also that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.80, and that, if at full employment, the economy would produce an output and income of 3900 By how much would the government need to cut taxes (T) to bring the economy to full employment?
5 3. permanent Income Hypothesis a) suppose that beta=.9 and R= 2222 (that is ~22%). For an individual who acts according to the PIH, will their consumption next period be higher than current consumption or lower? b) What is the main crucial difference between the Keynesian Consumption function and the consumption function derived from the PIH (or Lifetime Income Hypothesis)? c) If Present Value of future income stream is 500,000 and a person has a beta of.8, how much will their consumption go up today if only today's income increases by 1000? How much will their consumption increase (approximately) if their income goes up by 1000 in all periods?
Now we're adding an LM curve to the economy from Question 1. The money market is given by M/P = 0.02 / (r - Y/10,300)^2 M = 22 P = 2 We continue with the fiscal expansion scenario, with G0=10 and G1=12. Draw a new graph that includes the LM curve and both the IS curves. Show how at the same old unchanged r = 0.047 the volume of transactions supported by the money market is lower than the expenditure afforded by the goods and financial markets. That is, map r=0.047 into the expenditure you found in Question 2, Y1, and into the original volume of transactions, Y0.
pls answer urgent all question Q1,a,b,c . Q1-Suppose the government reduces taxes by $20 billion, that there is no crowding out, and that the marginal propensity to consume is ¾. a. What is the initial effect of the tax reduction on aggregate demand? b. What additional effects follow this initial effect? What is the total effect of the tax cut on aggregate demand? c.How does the total effect of this $40billion tax cut compare to the total effect of a $40 billion in governmentpurchases? Why?
Suppose that consumer spending initially rises by $5 billion for every 1 percent rise in household wealth and that investment spending initially rises by $20 billion for every 1 percentage point fall in the real interest rate. Also assume that the economy�s multiplier is 3. If household wealth falls by 6 percent because of declining house values, and the real interest rate falls by 2 percentage points, in what direction and by how much will the aggregate demand curve initially shift at each price level? The aggregate demand curve will shift_____ by $____ billion. In what direction and by how much will it eventually shift? The aggregate demand curve will shift_____ by $____ billion..
Suppose the federal government gives taxpayers a tax cut financed by borrowing. If taxpayers their debts, total spending will: O decrease. O first increase and then decrease. O increase. O remain unchanged.
By how much did the disposable income of rich people increase as a result of the 2017 drop in the top marginal tax rate from 39.6 percent to 37 percent? Assume rich people have $2 trillion of gross income in the highest bracket.