Suppose the government decides to control the price of gasoline and set it at a price lower than the prevailing market price or Pg < P* where Pg (is the government-controlled price) and P* is the market price. Discuss the ensuing consumer surplus, producer surplus and deadweight loss from this government policy. Show graphically and explain intuitively.

Suppose the government decides to control the price of gasoline and set it at a price lower than the prevailing market price or Pg < P* where Pg (is the government-controlled price) and P* is the market price. Discuss the ensuing consumer surplus, producer surplus and deadweight loss from this government policy. Show graphically and explain intuitively.

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter16: Public Goods And Public Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14PAE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Paper cups are popular items for schools and are produced in the market. There are equations for the Supply and Inverse Demand of paper cups that model its Supply and Demand graph. These equations are (for supply), P = 2 + 3Qs, and (for Inverse Demand), P = 12 - 2Qd. Likewise, paper cups are inexpensive and not very helpful for companies trying to achieve high profits. As a result, the government placed a price support of $9. (Part I) Draw the market equilibrium with the government intervention (Q**, P**) of the price ceiling. Please label the graph for slopes, equilibrium points, price support, etc. (Part II) What is the market equilibrium with the intervention of the government (Q**, P**)? (Part III) What is the government surplus (GS**)? (Part IV) What is the Dead Weight Loss (DWL**)?
Please only answer Questions D, E and F: Suppose now that the government decides to increase the number of quotas available to 72 units, but it keeps the price support at the current level of $72. d) Calculate (1) the consumer surplus, (ii) the producer surplus, (iii) deadweight loss, (e) Which of the two options would the producers prefer? Option 1, Option 2, or None ? (f) Which of the two options would be preferred by society? Option 1, Option 2 or None?
The market for cookies is represented by the following supply and demand conditions: QD =1,000 – 200P and QS = 400P – 200, where P is the £ price per box of cookies and Q measures boxes per day. Suppose the government places a quota on cookies of 500 boxes per day. Solve for the equilibrium price and quantity and then use supply and demand curves to illustrate your answer. Calculate consumer surplus before and after the quota. Calculate producer surplus before and after the quota. Calculate the deadweight loss (excess burden) from the quota.
Consider a market where supply and demand are given by Qxs = −16 + Px and Qxd = 92 − 2Px . Suppose the government imposes a price floor of $40 and agrees to purchase and discard any and all units consumers do not buy at the floor price of $40 per unit. a. Determine the cost to the government of buying firms’ unsold units. b. Compute the lost social welfare (deadweight loss) that stems from the $40 price floor
Suppose the government introduces a price cap on energy which is below the equilibrium price of energy and therefore effective. In a carefully labelled diagram, illustrate the demand and supply function, the consumer and producer surplus, the (total) deadweight loss and the deadweight loss attributable to consumers and attributable to producers. Illustrate the quantity demanded, quantity supplied and the quantity that is traded. Is there a shortage or over-supply? Explain.
Consider a market that is perfectly competitive and has no externalities. Which, if any, of these government interventions would lead to deadweight loss from preventing surplus generating transactions from occuring? (a) A subsidy (b) A tax (c) A binding price floor (d) A binding price ceiling.
Consider a market where supply and demand are given by QXS = −16 + PX and QXd = 83 − 2PX. Suppose the government imposes a price floor of $36, and agrees to purchase and discard any and all units consumers do not buy at the floor price of $36 per unit. Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to the nearest penny (two decimal places). a. Determine the cost to the government of buying firms’ unsold units.$ b. Compute the lost social welfare (deadweight loss) that stems from the $36 price floor.$
Consider the following market. Demand is given by Qd= 5- P where Qd is the quantity demand and P is the price. Supply is given by Qs = P/2 where Qs is the quantity supplied. a. What is the market equilibrium quantity and price? b Calculate consumer, producer and total surplus c. Suppose the government imposes a price floor of P = 4. Calculate the consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss.
Consider the market for ice cream cones. Suppose that supply in this market is given by P^S = Q^S and demand is given by P^D = 30 - 4Q^D. Answer the following question. Compute consumer surplus, producer surplus, and government surplus in the market for ice cream cones with and without the $1.00 per ice cream cone tax. Compute the deadweight loss created by the tax.
Market demand for Mandrake roots is given by Q=325-4P and market supply is given by Q=5P. The government imposes a price ceiling of $10. What is the minimum Deadweight Loss, in absolute terms, because of the price ceiling? Assume competitive markets.
The market supply and demand for solar panels are given respectively by QS = 80P – 5,000 and QD = 65,000 – 20P, where P is price per solar panel and Q measures the quantity of solar panels. Suppose the government provides a £100 subsidy per solar panel. A. Calculate the price and equilibrium quantity before the government subsidy. B. Calculate the post-subsidy equilibrium quantity, the prices consumers pay and the price producers receive C. How much does the subsidy program cost the government? (3%)
The market demand and supply functions for potatoes are: QD = 2,000 - 500P and QS = 800 + 100P. To help potato producers, the government is considering legislation that would put a price floor at $2.25 per bag. If this price floor is implemented, determine (i) how many bags of potatoes will the government be forced to buy to keep the price at $2.25; (ii) how much government will spend in total; and (iii) how much producer- and consumer -surplus changes.