Suppose there are two countries Japan and US and they produce two goods Computers and Cars. Japan has absolute advantage in both the goods? Can these two nations trade with each other? Justify your answer with the help of a relevant theory of international trade.

Suppose there are two countries Japan and US and they produce two goods Computers and Cars. Japan has absolute advantage in both the goods? Can these two nations trade with each other? Justify your answer with the help of a relevant theory of international trade.

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter33: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1WNG

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine,) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios? Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber? In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good? In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize?
Does intra-industry trade contradict the theory of comparative advantage?
In the United States, one worker can produce 10 tons of steel per day or 20 tons of chemicals per day. In the United Kingdom, one worker can produce 5 tons of steel per day or 15 tons of chemicals per day. Show by way of calculations: a) The United States has absolute advantage in the production of? b) The United Kingdom has a comparative in the production of? c) If trade occurs between the United States and the United Kingdom, American firms will specialize in the production of?
Assume that our world consists of only two countries: the United States and the Rest of the World (ROW). Both of these countries produce airplanes and computers. The amounts of each good produced during an hour in each country are provided in the table below. US ROW Airplanes 5 4 Computers 15 10 Based on this table, who has the absolute advantage in airplanes? ______ In computers? ______ What is the opportunity cost of 1 airplane: in the US? __ _____________ in the ROW? ______________
Zeetopia and Freshland are two small tropical islands that use the same amounts of resources to produce mangoes and coconuts as shown in the table below. Coconuts (in tons) Mangoes (in tons) Zeetopia 50 60 Freshland 50 30 (a) Which island has an absolute advantage in producing coconuts? Explain. (b) Which island has a comparative advantage in producing coconuts? Explain. (c) Assume Zeetopia and Freshland decide to specialize according to their comparative advantages and 1 ton of coconuts is exchanged for 1 ton of mangoes. Are specialization and trade under these terms beneficial to both Zeetopia and Freshland? Explain. (d) Assume the two islands experience constant opportunity costs in the production of the two products. Draw a correctly labeled graph illustrating Zeetopia’s and Freshland’s production possibilities, showing coconuts on the horizontal axis and mangoes on the vertical axis. Plot the numerical values from the table above on your graph. (e) On your graph…
The two products, X and Y, and the two nations, A and B. The following equations provide the production possibility frontier and utility function for each country: A. Does nation A’s economy exhibit constant opportunity cost in production? How about nation B? Support your answer using numeric/quantitative example. B. What is the optimal level of production and consumption in autarky for nation A and nation B which maximizes its community utility? Show full solution for both nations. C. Who has comparative advantage in producing X? How about Y? Support your answer. (5 points)
Are the following statements true or false? Explain ineach case.a. “Two countries can achieve gains from trade evenif one of the countries has an absolute advantagein the production of all goods.”b. “Certain talented people have a comparativeadvantage in everything they do.”c. “If a certain trade is good for one person, it can’tbe good for the other one.”d. “If a certain trade is good for one person, it isalways good for the other one.”e. “If trade is good for a country, it must be good foreveryone in the country
True or False: According to the theory of comparative advantage in international trade, even if one country is less efficient in the production of all goods compared to another country, both countries can still benefit from trade by specializing in the production of the goods in which they have a comparative advantage, leading to overall gains in efficiency and economic welfare.
When two individuals produce efficiently and then make a mutuallybeneficial trade based on comparative advantage, a. they both obtain consumption outside their production possibilitiesfrontier. b. they both obtain consumption inside their production possibilitiesfrontier. c. one individual consumes inside her production possibilities frontier,while the other consumes outside hers. d. each individual consumes a point on her own production possibilitiesfrontier
Consider a world with two goods (steel and wine). There are two countries (Germany and France) which have identical technologies and preferences. Assume that the production of wine is relatively labor intensive, while the production of steel is relatively capital intensive. Also assume that after free trade in goods, Germany exports steel and France exports wine. (a) What can you say about the relative endowments of the two countries? (Explain which trade theorem you are using to answer this question). (b) Before opening to trade in goods, both economies allow capital mobility. i) In which direction is capital flowing (explain why)? ii) What will happen to the production of wine and steel in both countries? (hint: using an Edgeworth box might help); and iii) What will be the effect of capital mobility on factor prices in the two countries? (c) Instead, assume that there is labor mobility instead of capital mobility. i) In which direction will labor flow? ii) What will happen…
Draw the production possibility curve for each country using the data provided in the table. b. Which country has an absolute advantage in what product? Which country has a comparative advantage in what product? Show your work! c. Without trade, what is the price of food in terms of computers for both countries? Showyour work! d. What is the range of prices (i.e., the CPC) at which trade can occur? Also, show (a) the possible CPC for each country and (b) the possible production and consumption possibility lines for both countries after trade. Show your work!
When countries specialize based on their comparative advantage and trade with each other, how does it lead to gains from trade for both countries (even if one country has an absolute advantage in both goods)?