Suppose you have a house worth $200,000 (wealth). Your utility of wealth is given by U(w) = ln(w). There is a small chance that a fire will damage your house causing a loss of $75,000. You estimate there is a 2% chance of fire. a) What is your expected wealth? b) What is your expected utility from owning the house? c) Suppose you can add a fire detection/prevention system to your house. This would reduce the chance of a bad event to 0 but it would cost you $C to install. What is the most you are willing to pay for the security system? (Here is an identity you will find useful

Suppose you have a house worth $200,000 (wealth). Your utility of wealth is given by U(w) = ln(w). There is a small chance that a fire will damage your house causing a loss of $75,000. You estimate there is a 2% chance of fire. a) What is your expected wealth? b) What is your expected utility from owning the house? c) Suppose you can add a fire detection/prevention system to your house. This would reduce the chance of a bad event to 0 but it would cost you $C to install. What is the most you are willing to pay for the security system? (Here is an identity you will find useful

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter19: The Basic Tools Of Finance

Section19.2: Managing Risk

Problem 2QQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Leo owns one share of Anteras, a semiconductor chip company which may have to recall millions of chips. The stock currently trades at $100/share. Leo believes the probability that they have to recall the chips is 50%. If the chips have to be recalled, the stock price will be cut in half, but otherwise it will remain $100. The expected value of Leo's share is ______ Assume Leo has the utility function, U(X)=√X. The minimum price Leo would accept to sell his share is _______ Leo's risk premium is ________
You are considering a $500,000 investment in the fast-food industry and have narrowed your choice to either a McDonald’s or a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise. McDonald’s indicates that, based on the location where you are proposing to open a new restaurant, there is a 25 percent probability that aggregate 10-year profits (net of the initial investment) will be $16 million, a 50 percent probability that profits will be $8 million, and a 25 percent probability that profits will be −$1.6 million. The aggregate 10-year profit projections (net of the initial investment) for a Penn Station East Coast Subs franchise is $48 million with a 2.5 percent probability, $8 million with a 95 percent probability, and −$48 million with a 2.5 percent probability. Considering both the risk and expected profitability of these two investment opportunities, which is the better investment? Explain carefully.
Find the expected value assuming the risk factor is 30 % and the interest rate is 15%, if you will receive $20,000 one year from today. Find the expected value assuming the risk factor is 30 % and the interest rate is 15%, if you will receive $20,000 two years from today.
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) √x . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain.
Gary likes to gamble. Donna offers to bet him $31 on the outcome of a boat race. If Gary’s boat wins, Donna would give him $31. If Gary’s boat does not win, Gary would give her $31. Gary’s utility function is p1x^21+p2x^22, where p1 and p2 are the probabilities of events 1 and 2 and where x1 and x2 are his wealth if events 1 and 2 occur respectively. Gary’s total wealth is currently only $80 and he believes that the probability that he will win the race is 0.3. Which of the following is correct? (please submit the number corresponding to the correct answer). Taking the bet would reduce his expected utility. Taking the bet would leave his expected utility unchanged. Taking the bet would increase his expected utility. There is not enough information to determine whether taking the bet would increase or decrease his expected utility. The information given in the problem is self-contradictory.
A consumer has the following utility function u(x)= root x where x is the consumer’s total wealth. The consumer's total wealth is the consumer’s cash plus the value of her house. The consumer has $400 in cash (risk free) plus a house. The house is currently worth $756. With probability 70% nothing happens, and the value of the house stays the same. With probability 30%, high winds will cause $580 in damages to the house (in which case, the house value becomes $176). An insurance company offers to fully insure the house at an insurance premium p. What is the maximum insurance premium that the consumer is willing to pay? The consumer is willing to pay at most p=. The fair insurance premium is . In this example, the associated risk premium is .
. Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index u(x) = square root x. There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?
Show, using equations or a diagram, that an expected utility maximizer requires a higher return for a riskier asset
A risk-averse manager is considering two projects. The first project involves expanding the market for bologna; the second involves expanding the market for caviar. There is a 10 percent chance of a recession and a 90 percent chance of an economic boom. During a boom, the bologna project will lose $10,000, whereas the caviar project will earn $20,000. During a recession, the bologna project will earn $12,000 and the caviar project will lose $8,000. If the alternative is earning $3,000 on a safe asset (say, a Treasury bill), what should the manager do? Why?
An investor is considering three strategies for a $1,000 investment. The probable returns are estimated as follows: • Strategy 1: A profit of $10,000 with probability 0.15 and a loss of $1,000 with probability 0.85 • Strategy 2: A profit of $1,000 with probability 0.50, a profit of $500 with probability 0.30, and a loss of $500 with probability 0.20 • Strategy 3: A certain profit of $400 Which strategy has the highest expected profit? Explain why you would or would not advise the investor to adopt this strategy.
You are a risk-averse investor with a CRRA utility function. You are faced with the decision to invest your total wealth W of £1,000,000 into a riskless asset which generates a return of 5% or into a risky asset which either generates a return of 20% or a loss of −4% with equal probability. Find the optimal investment allocation with a coefficient of relative risk aversion η=2, and comment on your results.
Studies have concluded that a college degree is a very good investment. Suppose that a college graduate earns about 75% more money per hour than a high-school graduate. If the lifetime earnings of a high-school graduate average $1,200,000, what is the expected value of earning a college degree?