The construction of a house now, to cost 500,000. b. The construction of a smaller house now, to cost 250,000 and at the end of 3 years, an extension to be added to cost 350,000. Which of the two options is more economical if the interest rate is 20% compounded annually and depreciation not to be considered?

The construction of a house now, to cost 500,000. b. The construction of a smaller house now, to cost 250,000 and at the end of 3 years, an extension to be added to cost 350,000. Which of the two options is more economical if the interest rate is 20% compounded annually and depreciation not to be considered?

Personal Finance

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337669214

Author:GARMAN

Publisher:GARMAN

Chapter16: Real Estate And High-risk Investments

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2FPC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Dauten is offered a replacement machine which has a cost of 8,000, an estimated useful life of 6 years, and an estimated salvage value of 800. The replacement machine is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation at the time of purchase- The replacement machine would permit an output expansion, so sales would rise by 1,000 per year; even so, the new machines much greater efficiency would cause operating expenses to decline by 1,500 per year The new machine would require that inventories be increased by 2,000, but accounts payable would simultaneously increase by 500. Dautens marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 25%, and its WACC is 11%. Should it replace the old machine?
A newlywed couple is planning to build a house of their own. They are considering two options:a. The construction of a house now, to cost 500,000.b. The construction of a smaller house now, to cost 250,000 and at the end of 3 years, an extension to be added to cost 350,000.Which of the two options is more economical if the interest rate is 20% compounded annually and depreciation not to be considered?ANS. OPTION B IS MUCH ECONOMICAL BY 47,453.70
Your friend Harold is trying to decide whether to buy or lease his next vehicle. He has gathered information about each option but is not sure how to compare the alternatives. Purchasing a new vehicle will cost $27,500, and Harold expects to spend about $600 per year in maintenance costs. He would keep the vehicle for five years and estimates that the salvage value will be $10,900. Alternatively, Harold could lease the same vehicle for five years at a cost of $3,575 per year, including maintenance. Assume a discount rate of 12 percent. Required: Calculate the net present value of Harold’s options. (Future Value of $1,Present Value of $1, Future Value Annuity of $1, Present Value Annuity of $1.) Advise Harold about which option he should choose.
Chris is considering submitting a bit for the requested project, which involves building four houses per year for the next 3 years for a gated community. To complete such project, Chris would need to buy tools in the amount of $66,000, which would be completely depreciated over the project’s lifespan assuming straight-line depreciation, and such tools can be sold for $40,000 at the end of the project. Net working capital would be $16,000 over the life span of the project. The project’s variable cost would be $88,000 per house, and fixed cost would be $18,000 each year. The tax rate is 34% and Chris’ require rate of return is 14%. How much at minimum Chris should bid for each house? (Rounded to the nearest $500). A. $115,000 B. $98,500 C. $97,500 D. $96,500 E. $95,50
An investor would like to purchase a new apartment property for $2.2 million. However, she faces the decision of whether to use 70 percent or 80 percent financing. The 70 percent loan can be obtained at 4 percent interest for 20 years. The 80 percent loan can be obtained at 5 percent interest for 20 years. NOI is expected to be $150,000 per year and increase at 2 percent annually, the same rate at which the property is expected to increase in value. The building and improvements represent 80 percent of value and will be depreciated over 39 years (1 ÷ 39 per year) with no mid-month convention for year 1. The project is expected to be sold after five years. Assume a 35 percent tax bracket for ordinary income, a 25 percent for depreciation recapture, and 20 percent for capital gains taxes. Required: a. What would the BTIRR and ATIRR be at each level of financing (assume monthly mortgage amortization)? b. What is the break-even interest rate (BEIR) for this project? c. What is the…
Charlie is planning to buy a small apartment complex; the complex will cost $1,000,000 and they will generate $450,000 in profits over the next three years. The complex will also need $50,000 in renovations during year 4. Charlie's required rate of return is 17%. What is the NPV on Charlie's investment ___? and should Charlie purchase the apartments___? yes or no
Bill is assessing an investment in one of two studio apartments in Sydney’s Potts Point as rental properties for a 3-year time frame. Each property requires an initial outlay of $200,000 and would be sold at the end of 3 years. Bill expects that at this time he could sell property A for $300,000 and property B for $280,000. He also anticipates an increase in net rental income each year for each property. Property B is older but because of its excellent location he expects to achieve a higher net rental even though its expected sales price is likely to be a bit lower than property B. If Bill did not want to invest in either of the two properties then he would invest the $200,000 in a managed fund of equivalent risk which is expected to pay a rate of return of 7% p.a. The expected net income flows for both properties is shown below: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Property A $10,000 $10,250 $10,500 Property B $11,000…
Alicia is considering two offers-to-purchase that she has received on a residential building lot she wishes to sell. One is a cash offer of $145,000. The other offer consists of three payments of $49,000-one now, one in six months, and one in twelve months. Which offer has the larger economic value if Alicia can earn 4.4% compounded quarterly on low-risk investments? How much more (in current dollars) is the better offer worth?
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,760 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial $1,190 investment of plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,950 What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is per year? Should Marian take it? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 2.4% per year? The NPV of this opportunity is $ (Round to the nearest cent.)
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,600 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $1,150 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,750. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.9%per year? Should Marian take it? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is per year?
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,440 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $1,110 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,550. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.5% per year? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.5% per year? The NPV of this opportunity is $_______ (Round to the nearest cent)
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $16,000 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $4,000 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $20,000. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 3% per year? Should Marian take it? The NPV of this opportunity is $____ (Round to the nearest dollar.)