The criminal case against the four NYPD officers who shot and killed Amadou Diallo resulted in: A.an acquittal for all four. B.a murder conviction for all four. C.a murder conviction for two of them, an acquittal for two. D.none of the above

The criminal case against the four NYPD officers who shot and killed Amadou Diallo resulted in: A.an acquittal for all four. B.a murder conviction for all four. C.a murder conviction for two of them, an acquittal for two. D.none of the above

Contemporary Auditing

11th Edition

ISBN:9781337650380

Author:KNAPP

Publisher:KNAPP

Chapter4: Ethical Responsibilities Of Accountants

Section4.7: Zane Corbin, Accounting Major

Problem 4Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Green, a police officer, suspected that Brown was engaged in illegal racketeering activities. To obtain evidence of Brown’s illegal conduct, Green place a bug in Brown’s home without a warrant. Green may have violated which of Brown’s constitutional rights? A. Fourteenth Amendments rights. B. Fifth Amendments rights. C. Sixth Amendments rights. D. Fourth Amendments rights.
If you are notified that one of your clients is being investigated by the Serious Crimes Agency, a. It doesn't matter to the Crime Agency whether you tell him or not b. It makes no difference whether you tell him or not c. You have a duty to tell the client d. You have a duty not to tell the client
Cartage Inc. agrees to pick up two truckloads of housewares for Discount Corporation and store the contents to be delivered later. After Cartage unloads the goods at its storage facility, some of them disappear from the loading dock. A court will presume that a. the goods were stolen through no fault of Cartage. b. the warehouse is in a high-crime area. c. Cartage was negligent. d. Discount was negligent
During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) contains all of the following titles that have a direct impact on forensic accounting and fraud except: Group of answer choices Title 4 prohibits personal loans and requires certain financial disclosures. Title 11 provides a possible 25-year prison sentence for anyone altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing a record, document, or other object (or otherwise impeding) for an official proceeding. Title 9 increases maximum prison sentences for mail and wire fraud from 5 to 20 years. Willfully and knowingly certifying financial reports not in compliance with the Act is now a criminal offense. Title 4 prohibits personal loans and requires certain financial disclosures.
Black is a Certified Fraud Examiner for the ABC Company. Green, an employee in the accounting department, steals $40,000 worth of merchandise from the store’s warehoused. If Green’s cas is eventually referred to the police by Black, they will probably charge Green with: A. Breach of contract. B. Breach of fiduciary duty. C. Embezzlement. D. Larceny.
Jack is a policeman tasked to arrest a group of drug pushers. The drug pushers see Jack approach and decide to run. Jack fires, and as a result, a 5 year old child is killed by a stray bullet. Is this a justifying circumstance? Yes No
Able, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed a suspect involved in an environmental crime. The suspect, Blake, admitted to purposely polluting the environment. Blake’s action eventually caused almost thirty people to develop serious environmentally related illness. Upon hearing this fact from Blake, Able should: A. Scold Blake for his conduct. B. Make no comment whatever. C. Treat Blake with decency and respect. D. Ask Blake to apologize to the victims.
During the interview of a suspect in an embezzlement case, several common themes are developed that make the offense seem morally acceptable to the suspect. Which of the following is NOT commonly used with embezzlers and other fraud offenders? A. “Borrowing” versus “stealing” B. “Did it for the family” C. “Not being paid enough” D. “Protesting an unjust law”
Research the case against Bernie Madoff who was convicted in 2009 for running the largest Ponzi scheme in U. S. history. Do you think that Bernie received a sentence that was fair? Most importantly, research David Friehling, Bernie's auditor. Discuss what David Friehling's role was in this scheme. What outcome occurred from the legal action taken against Friehling.
Thompson’s house was destroyed by fire and claims were filed with the insurance company. The insurance company (insurer) hired Cannon to investigate the fire as it was suspicious about the cause. Subsequently, the insurer denied the claims based on Cannon’s report. Thompson sued the insurer and Cannon. Thompson claimed to be a third party beneficiary of the Cannon-insurer contract. Is Thompson correct? If not, what type of beneficiary is he and why?
Marvin is a state legislator. Bases on his belief that a certain infrastructure project in the public’s best interest, Marvin in favor of the project. Several weeks later, a contractor who financially benefited from the project approaches Marvin with an envelope full of cash and thanks him for his “public service.” If Marvin accepts the cash, which of the following best describes his violation? A. Official bribery. B. Commercial bribery. C. Illegal gratuity. D. Economic extortion.