The history of the stock market shows that there are a large number of start -up corporations whose stock price traded at high market values despite large losses and never any positive earnings. Why would investors be willing to pay a high price for the stock of a corporation that has never reported positive earnings?

The history of the stock market shows that there are a large number of start -up corporations whose stock price traded at high market values despite large losses and never any positive earnings. Why would investors be willing to pay a high price for the stock of a corporation that has never reported positive earnings?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter15: Dividend Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 12QTD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Each of the following factors may cause a corporation to lower its dividend payout ratio EXCEPT A. the corporation's current and quick ratios are higher than industry average. B. the corporation's earnings predictability is high. C. current common shareholders are unable to participate in new equity offerings. D. the corporation's retained earnings balance is high.
Which of the following statements is true? a. High liquidity means a company is short on cash and may be unable to pay its debts.b. When a company decides to go public through an IPO, it is typically targeting to sell its shares to only a handful of shareholders. c. If the company has a higher than expected extremely high profit this year, equity holders will benefit more than debt holders as debtholders are the residual claimers for the cash flows of the company.d. In the extreme case, the debt holders take legal ownership of the firm's assets through a process called bankruptcy.e. Equity holders expect to receive dividends and the firm is always legally obligated to pay them.
Based upon the empirical evidence, state whether the following statements are true or false, and briefly explain why. a). Firms are reluctant to change dividends. b). Stock prices generally go up on the ex-dividend date by less than the amount of the dividend in classic tax system. c). Increasing dividend payments to stockholders generally makes bondholders in the firm better off. d). Dividends create a tax disadvantage for investors even when tax rates on dividends and capital gain is the same.
Which of the following would not be an appropriate reason for a firm to repurchase its stock: As an investment if management believes the market has undervalued the stock price. In order to have sufficient shares to cover employee stock programs. Solely to boost Earnings Per Share. Both A and B.
Why might a company repurchase its own stock? A) It believes that the market undervalues its shares B) To offset dilutive effects of employee stock options granted C) To recognize an economic gain when the treasury shares are later sold for a profit D) To improve earnings per share by reducing the denominator E) All of the above is it just A and B or is it all of the above
If a company’s market price rises above the IPO price, does that suggest that the company left money on the table and thus received less for the shares than it should have received? If most companies do leave money on the table, does that indicate the IPO market is inefficient? explain
If payout policy is irrelevant or has no effect on firm value, then why do individuals have a preference on payout policy? Shefrin and Statman (1984) provide a really interesting illustration of why payout policy may be important to individual investors by highlighting a particular case of a dividend omission by Consolidated Edison in the 70s, which occurred after 89 years of uninterrupted dividends. One of the shareholder's statements concerning the missed dividend payment during the 1974 annual meeting was as follows: What are we to do? You give us shorthand answers. You don't know when the dividend is coming back. Who is going to pay my rent? I had a husband. Now Con Ed has to be my husband. (Shefrin et al., 1984, p. 276) An excellent and very readable summary questioning the dividend's relevance is provided by Black (1976) and a summary of the current state of the literature is found in Baker and Weigand (2015). The questions that you should consider for this discussion response…
Preferred stock may be good for a company because it a. is not as costly as common stock or bonds. b. expands the capital base of the firm without diluting the common stock ownership. c. has no future negative ramifications when dividend payments are missed. d. does not require interest payment in times of financial trouble, but are tax-deductible when dividends are paid.
Which of the following statements is NOT true about Initial Public Offerings? A. An IPO occurs when a private company sells stock to the public for the first timeB. IPOs are less risky than a typical stock market investment since they are typically smaller companiesC. When an IPO occurs, a company raises money from public investors that they use to grow their businessD. IPOs are risky investments since the company going public often has a limited track record of performance
What are some of the risks an investor would face when investing in a stock? In addition to the business risk coming from the type of business environment that your company operates in, what additional risk would be of concern to an investor? The company might be mismanaged and do poorly or go out of business. The company's stock market return might be wildly unpredictable as the operating performance might be unstable. The company's competitors might do a better job and take market share away? The list goes on and on... What risks would you face if you bought 100 shares of Tesla?
Explain why the following statement is wrong: “The stock price is equal to the value of equity, divided by shares outstanding. Therefore, companies should avoid issuing equity because the number of shares outstanding goes up and thus the stock price would decrease."
If stock dividends and stock splits don't give shareholders much value, why do you think companies still do this?