The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 12%. A warden suspects that this percent is different ifthe sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 322 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 48 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use z-test for a population proportion Vb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: ? vSelect an answer(please enter a decimal)H1: ? v Select an answer v(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v =(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value =(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)e. The p-value is ? V af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that...O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 12% at a = 0.01,so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 12% at = 0.01,so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 12%.O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 12% at a = 0.01, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 15% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there wouldbe a 10.84% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 12% of all convicted sexoffender drug addicts become repeat offenders or more than 12% of all convicted sex offenderdrug addicts become repeat offenders.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 10.84% chance that either more than 15% of the 322 convicted sex offenderdrug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or fewer than 9% of the 322 convicted sexoffender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders.O There is a 10.84% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders differs from 12%.O There is a 10.84% chance of a Type I error.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is different from 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to12%.O There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is different from 12%.O There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of allconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.

Question

The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 12%. A warden suspects that this percent is different ifthe sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 322 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 48 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use z-test for a population proportion Vb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: ? vSelect an answer(please enter a decimal)H1: ? v Select an answer v(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v =(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value =(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)e. The p-value is ? V af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that...O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 12% at a = 0.01,so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 12% at = 0.01,so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 12%.O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 12% at a = 0.01, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 15% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there wouldbe a 10.84% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 12% of all convicted sexoffender drug addicts become repeat offenders or more than 12% of all convicted sex offenderdrug addicts become repeat offenders.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 10.84% chance that either more than 15% of the 322 convicted sex offenderdrug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or fewer than 9% of the 322 convicted sexoffender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders.O There is a 10.84% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders differs from 12%.O There is a 10.84% chance of a Type I error.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is different from 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to12%.O There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is different from 12%.O There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka &#34;Reptilians&#34; are running the world.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 12% and if another 322 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of allconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 12%.

Accepted Answer

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/f2ea9a3e-b1b1-4123-bd94-01cdb4b32585.jpg