Try to find situations where an RTP application might reasonably do the following: ■ Send multiple packets at essentially the same time that need different timestamps. ■ Send packets at different times that need the same timestamp. Argue, in consequence, that RTP timestamps must, in at least some cases, be provided (at least indirectly) by the application. (Hint: Think of cases where the sending rate and playback rate might not match.)

Try to find situations where an RTP application might reasonably do the following: ■ Send multiple packets at essentially the same time that need different timestamps. ■ Send packets at different times that need the same timestamp. Argue, in consequence, that RTP timestamps must, in at least some cases, be provided (at least indirectly) by the application. (Hint: Think of cases where the sending rate and playback rate might not match.)

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Let's say that Host C is running a Web server that listens on port 80. Suppose that this web server is able to maintain persistent connections and responds to requests from both Host A and Host B. Is Host C sending all of the requests over the same connection, or are there many sockets in use? Do each of them have port 80 even though they are broadcast over separate sockets? It's something you need to discuss and provide some clarification on.
We explore whether either UDP or TCP offers any level of end-point authentication in this problem. a. Consider a server that accepts a request via UDP and responds via UDP (for example, as done by a DNS server). Where would the server give its answer if a client with IP address X spoofs it with address Y? b. Assume a server receives a SYN with IP source address Y and responds with SYNACK. The server then receives an ACK with IP source address Y and the right acknowledgmentamount. Assuming the server selects a random initial sequence number and there is no "man-in-the-middle," how can the server be confident that the recipient is really at Y (and not at any other address X that spoofs Y)?
Let's pretend that we're on a fixed path, and we're trying to send a packet to a host. from a starting point to a finishing point List the many components of delay as well: Approximately how many delays are continuous for how long, and approximately how many are timedependent?
A connection that connects two hosts may transport many packets at the same time. Please break down how much time is spent on each step of the processing of a freight load for me. Should the duration of one delay be predetermined, while the other delay's time might be flexible, depending on the situation?
Try to send a packet to a host from wherever you are, assuming that the fixed route is in place. between the start and the finish The following delays should be included in your list as well: How long have the delays been going on, and how many of them are connected to the passage of time?
Consider the following 4-message protocol: A → S: (B, {(A, K1)}KpbS) S → B: A B → S: (A, {(B, K2)}KpbS) S → A: (B, {K2}K1) Which of the following statements is true, at the end of the protocol, and with regards to the purpose of the protocol: a) Both A and B establish a session key K2, and B is sure of A’s identity b) Both A and B establish a session key K1, and B is sure of A’s identity c) Both A and B establish a session key K1, and A is sure of B’s identity d) Both A and B establish a session key K1, and both B and A are sure of each other’s identity e) Both A and B establish a session key K2, and A is sure of B’s identity f) Both A and B establish a session key K1 g) Both A and B establish a session key K2 h) Both A and B authenticate each other by knowing each other’s identities i) A ends up knowing B’s identity j) B ends up knowing A’s identity k) None of the above l) All of the above
It is theoretically feasible for two hosts to communicate with one another by sending packets back and forth over the same connection. Please enumerate all of the components that are responsible for the overall amount of time required to process a single packet, starting to end. Is it to be anticipated that one of the delays will continue for a certain amount of time, while the duration of the other delay will be more unpredictable?
Consider a network with 4 links between two hosts where the maximum allowable packet size is 1000 bits; each link has a transmission rate of 2000 bits per second, except the second link has a transmission rate of 1000 bits per second. How long does it take to send 6000 bits from one host to the other? You may ignore propogation delay, assume there is no other traffic on the network, and assume that no routers drop packets due to queue length. Round your answer to two decimal places.
It is possible for a series of packets to be sent from one host to another utilizing the same route between the hosts. Please break down the time it takes for a single package to go from beginning to conclusion. Is it expected that one of the delays would last for a certain period of time, while the other delay's length remains open?
For the sake of this example, let's assume that a packet is being sent from its point of origin to an address at the other end of the network via the fixed route. The different delays-causing variables are also listed below: How many of the overall delays are time-dependent, and what proportion of the total delays are continuous for how long?
It is possible for a series of packets to be sent from one host to another over the same connection. Please break down the time it takes for a single package to go from beginning to conclusion. Is it expected that one of the delays would last a certain period of time while the other delay's length will be more malleable?
Using the same connection between two hosts, it is possible to send a series of packets in a single transmission. Please break down the time it takes for a single package to go from beginning to conclusion. Is it expected that one of the delays would last a certain period of time while the other delay's length will be more malleable?