WHAT HAPPENS IF A PARTNER BECOMES INSOLVENT? In 2010, three dentists-Ben Rogers, Judy Wilkinson, and Henry Walker-formed a partnership to open a practice in Toledo, Ohio. The partnership's primary purpose was to reduce expenses by sharing building and equipment costs, supplies, and the services of a clerical staff. Each contributed $70,000 in cash and, with the help of a bank loan, constructed a building and acquired furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Because the partners maintained their own separate clients, annual net income has been allocated as follows: Each partner receives the specific amount of revenues that he or she generated during the period less one-third of all expenses. From the beginning, the partners did not anticipate expansion of the practice; consequently, they could withdraw cash each year up to 90 percent of their share of income for the period. The partnership had been profitable for a number of years. Over the years, Rogers has used much of his income to speculate in real estate in the Toledo area. By 2017 he was spending less time with the dental practice so that he could concentrate on his investments. Unfortunately, a number of these real estate deals proved to be bad decisions and he incurred significant losses. On November 8, 2017, while Rogers was out of town, his personal creditors filed a $97,000 claim against the partnership's assets. Unbeknownst to Wilkinson and Walker, Rogers had become insolvent. Wilkinson and Walker hurriedly met to discuss the problem because Rogers could not be located. Rogers's capital account was currently at $105,000, but the partnership had only $27,000 in cash and liquid assets. The partners knew that Rogers's dental equipment had been used for many years and could be sold for relatively little. In contrast, the building had appreciated in value, and the creditors' claims could be satisfied by selling the property. However, this action would have a tremendously adverse impact on the dental practice of the remaining two partners.

Individual Income Taxes
43rd Edition
ISBN:9780357109731
Author:Hoffman
Publisher:Hoffman
Chapter11: Investor Losses
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2RP
icon
Related questions
Question
WHAT HAPPENS IF A PARTNER BECOMES INSOLVENT?
In 2010, three dentists-Ben Rogers, Judy Wilkinson, and Henry
Walker-formed a partnership to open a practice in Toledo,
Ohio. The partnership's primary purpose was to reduce
expenses by sharing building and equipment costs, supplies,
and the services of a clerical staff. Each contributed $70,000 in
cash and, with the help of a bank loan, constructed a building
and acquired furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Because the
partners maintained their own separate clients, annual net
income has been allocated as follows: Each partner receives the
specific amount of revenues that he or she generated during the
period less one-third of all expenses. From the beginning, the
partners did not anticipate expansion of the practice;
consequently, they could withdraw cash each year up to 90
percent of their share of income for the period.
The partnership had been profitable for a number of years. Over
the years, Rogers has used much of his income to speculate in
real estate in the Toledo area. By 2017 he was spending less
time with the dental practice so that he could concentrate on his
investments. Unfortunately, a number of these real estate deals
proved to be bad decisions and he incurred significant losses.
On November 8, 2017, while Rogers was out of town, his
personal creditors filed a $97,000 claim against the partnership's
assets. Unbeknownst to Wilkinson and Walker, Rogers had
become insolvent.
Wilkinson and Walker hurriedly met to discuss the problem
because Rogers could not be located. Rogers's capital account
was currently at $105,000, but the partnership had only $27,000
in cash and liquid assets. The partners knew that Rogers's
dental equipment had been used for many years and could be
sold for relatively little. In contrast, the building had appreciated
in value, and the creditors' claims could be satisfied by selling
the property. However, this action would have a tremendously
adverse impact on the dental practice of the remaining two
partners.
What alternatives are available to Wilkinson and Walker to deal
with this situation, and what are the advantages and
disadvantages of each?
Transcribed Image Text:WHAT HAPPENS IF A PARTNER BECOMES INSOLVENT? In 2010, three dentists-Ben Rogers, Judy Wilkinson, and Henry Walker-formed a partnership to open a practice in Toledo, Ohio. The partnership's primary purpose was to reduce expenses by sharing building and equipment costs, supplies, and the services of a clerical staff. Each contributed $70,000 in cash and, with the help of a bank loan, constructed a building and acquired furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Because the partners maintained their own separate clients, annual net income has been allocated as follows: Each partner receives the specific amount of revenues that he or she generated during the period less one-third of all expenses. From the beginning, the partners did not anticipate expansion of the practice; consequently, they could withdraw cash each year up to 90 percent of their share of income for the period. The partnership had been profitable for a number of years. Over the years, Rogers has used much of his income to speculate in real estate in the Toledo area. By 2017 he was spending less time with the dental practice so that he could concentrate on his investments. Unfortunately, a number of these real estate deals proved to be bad decisions and he incurred significant losses. On November 8, 2017, while Rogers was out of town, his personal creditors filed a $97,000 claim against the partnership's assets. Unbeknownst to Wilkinson and Walker, Rogers had become insolvent. Wilkinson and Walker hurriedly met to discuss the problem because Rogers could not be located. Rogers's capital account was currently at $105,000, but the partnership had only $27,000 in cash and liquid assets. The partners knew that Rogers's dental equipment had been used for many years and could be sold for relatively little. In contrast, the building had appreciated in value, and the creditors' claims could be satisfied by selling the property. However, this action would have a tremendously adverse impact on the dental practice of the remaining two partners. What alternatives are available to Wilkinson and Walker to deal with this situation, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Partners and Partnerships
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Individual Income Taxes
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357109731
Author:
Hoffman
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
SWFT Essntl Tax Individ/Bus Entities 2020
SWFT Essntl Tax Individ/Bus Entities 2020
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357391266
Author:
Nellen
Publisher:
Cengage
College Accounting, Chapters 1-27 (New in Account…
College Accounting, Chapters 1-27 (New in Account…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305666160
Author:
James A. Heintz, Robert W. Parry
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357233306
Author:
Maloney
Publisher:
Cengage