What internal controls might have prevented a former Smucker employee from stealing $4.1 million over 16 years? In October 2019, a former Smucker employee, Mark Kershey, was charged with defrauding the J.M. Smucker Company of more than $4.1 million over a 16 year period. Kershey was the chief airplane mechanic at the company's hangar at the Akron-Canton Airport inOhio from 1990 until he was discharged by Smucker in 2018. From 1997 until he left Smucker,Kershey invoiced Smucker for more than $8.1 million by using a fictitious entity he created. Hebilled Smucker for nonexistent parts and/or work that he himself actually performed as part ofhis duties as a salaried employee. Most of these invoices were for less than $10,000, which Kershey himself was authorized to approve. A supervisor to Kershey approved the few invoices that were for more than $10,000 based on his trust in Kershey. To carry out his false billing scheme, Kershey set up a post office box in Lake Township in Ohio using the fictitious entity name of Aircraft Parts Services Co (APS). He (as APS) woul then invoice Smucker using non-sequential invoice numbers, so it looked like APS was invoicing other companies too. Kershey used the proceeds to purchase and maintain two planes, several automobiles, and to make payments on his house. Kershey was eventually caught in late 2012 when three checks written by Smucker to APS totalingS44,000 were not cashed. When a Smucker employee questioned Kershey about the APS un-cashed checks, Kershey indicated that APS had been sold to another Smucker vendor. The false billing scheme pegan to unravel and Kershey was fired by Smucker. The Special Assistant United States Attorney has charged Kershey with mail fraud following an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Canton, Ohio. Charges were filed in October 2019 and the case is pending. Questions: 1. What internal controls could have been used to prevent Kershey from carrying out the false billing scheme? 2. What factors might have contributed to the weak internal control environment that allowed this scheme to exist for 21 years?

SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020
43rd Edition
ISBN:9780357391723
Author:Maloney
Publisher:Maloney
Chapter7: Deductions And Losses: Certain Business Expenses And Losses
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 22CE
icon
Related questions
Question
Answer question 1 and 2
What internal controls might have prevented a former Smucker employee from stealing $4.1 million over 16 years?
In October 2019, a former Smucker employee, Mark Kershey, was charged with defrauding the J.M. Smucker Company of more than $4.1 million over a 16 year period. Kershey was
the chief airplane mechanic at the company's hangar at the Akron-Canton Airport inOhio from 1990 until he was discharged by Smucker in 2018. From 1997 until he left
Smucker,Kershey invoiced Smucker for more than $8.1 million by using a fictitious entity he created. Hebilled Smucker for nonexistent parts and/or work that he himself actually
performed as part ofhis duties as a salaried employee. Most of these invoices were for less than $10,000, which Kershey himself was authorized to approve. A supervisor to Kershey
approved the few invoices that were for more than $10,000 based on his trust in Kershey.
To carry out his false billing scheme, Kershey set up a post office box in Lake Township in Ohio using the fictitious entity name of Aircraft Parts Services Co (APS). He (as APS) woule
then invoice Smucker using non-sequential invoice numbers, so it looked like APS was invoicing other companies too. Kershey used the proceeds to purchase and maintain two
planes, several automobiles, and to make payments on his house. Kershey was eventually caught in late 2012 when three checks written by Smucker to APS totalingS44,000 were not
cashed.
When a Smucker employee questioned Kershey about the APS un-cashed checks, Kershey indicated that APS had been sold to another Smucker vendor. The false billing scheme
began to unravel and Kershey was fired by Smucker. The Special Assistant United States Attorney has charged Kershey with mail fraud following an investigation by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Canton, Ohio. Charges were filed in October 2019 and the case is pending.
Questions:
1. What internal controls could have been used to prevent Kershey from carrying out the false billing scheme?
2. What factors might have contributed to the weak internal control environment that allowed this scheme to exist for 21 years?
Transcribed Image Text:What internal controls might have prevented a former Smucker employee from stealing $4.1 million over 16 years? In October 2019, a former Smucker employee, Mark Kershey, was charged with defrauding the J.M. Smucker Company of more than $4.1 million over a 16 year period. Kershey was the chief airplane mechanic at the company's hangar at the Akron-Canton Airport inOhio from 1990 until he was discharged by Smucker in 2018. From 1997 until he left Smucker,Kershey invoiced Smucker for more than $8.1 million by using a fictitious entity he created. Hebilled Smucker for nonexistent parts and/or work that he himself actually performed as part ofhis duties as a salaried employee. Most of these invoices were for less than $10,000, which Kershey himself was authorized to approve. A supervisor to Kershey approved the few invoices that were for more than $10,000 based on his trust in Kershey. To carry out his false billing scheme, Kershey set up a post office box in Lake Township in Ohio using the fictitious entity name of Aircraft Parts Services Co (APS). He (as APS) woule then invoice Smucker using non-sequential invoice numbers, so it looked like APS was invoicing other companies too. Kershey used the proceeds to purchase and maintain two planes, several automobiles, and to make payments on his house. Kershey was eventually caught in late 2012 when three checks written by Smucker to APS totalingS44,000 were not cashed. When a Smucker employee questioned Kershey about the APS un-cashed checks, Kershey indicated that APS had been sold to another Smucker vendor. The false billing scheme began to unravel and Kershey was fired by Smucker. The Special Assistant United States Attorney has charged Kershey with mail fraud following an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Canton, Ohio. Charges were filed in October 2019 and the case is pending. Questions: 1. What internal controls could have been used to prevent Kershey from carrying out the false billing scheme? 2. What factors might have contributed to the weak internal control environment that allowed this scheme to exist for 21 years?
Expert Solution
Step 1

Internal control system indicates the decisions regarding the rules and regulations of operations taken by the corporation for getting ensure the smooth flow of operations without error or fraud.

trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Techniques of Time Value Of Money
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020
SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357391723
Author:
Maloney
Publisher:
Cengage
Individual Income Taxes
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357109731
Author:
Hoffman
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357110362
Author:
Murphy
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305224414
Author:
JENNINGS
Publisher:
Cengage
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357161548
Author:
Raabe
Publisher:
Cengage
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357233306
Author:
Maloney
Publisher:
Cengage