When we consider data quality, what are the differencesamong validity, reliability, and representativeness? Howcan you know the data have high levels of these characteristics?
Q: what situation does observation method fits in gathering data?
A: The research methodology describes the process that is taken up by the researcher to examine the…
Q: How does a Facility manager's (FM) templates (janitorial or cleaners checklists) help the FM in…
A: The responsibilities of a center's supervisor can vary from one corporation to the next. The…
Q: please explain the following random sampling methods along with giving examples for each in a…
A: Sampling is a method of choosing individual members of a certain population sample or sample set to…
Q: How do you collect the data for each of the data collection methods? Explain
A: Data collection targets a set of people to get their opinions, their preferences, choices commonly…
Q: statistical data
A: Excel can create a pivotal table after a proper recommendation. Pivotal tables are great ways…
Q: What is the main purpose of using sensitivity analysis?
A: An analysis is a mathematics branch that explores ongoing changes and involves integration,…
Q: 5) What is the difference between exploratory (descriptive) and inferential methods in data…
A: Data analysis can be explained as the process of transforming, cleansing, collecting, and modeling…
Q: What is the effect of SOXs on the need for organization to improve quality of data ?
A: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) not only impacts an organization's leadership level, but it has a…
Q: Your college or university wishes to obtain reliable information about student perceptions of…
A: Introduction:- The research is to obtain information about students' perception of administrative…
Q: Why do we need exploratory data analysis? Why not go straight into modeling? you may ask.
A: Exploratory data analysis is defined as a part of data analysis where various techniques are…
Q: IDENTIFICATION: 1. The information that is provided by the respondents in a questionnaire is…
A: Note - As there are five questions are given and as per the guideline we can answer maximum three…
Q: what are the crm data sources of tim hortons
A: Customer relationship management (CRM) is a facet of relationship marketing that focuses on customer…
Q: a. What type of scores did you use? Why? b. Did you use a random method for deciding who would be in…
A: As per Bartleby guidelines, we can only solve the first three subparts of one question at a time.…
Q: 1- What are some of the biases that could be easily introduced into your questionnaires? What can be…
A: Biases in questionnaire is the major issue . To get the accurate data and information, biases can be…
Q: a point of view on the relevance of effectively managing one's own data
A: Every marketer should collect all the data regarding himself and his business in order to analyse…
Q: What types of secondary data could be useful to inform the development of the questionnaire?…
A: Data that are being collected for the first time or extracted from genuine sources are primary data.…
Q: What are your thoughts on data quality as it relates to data warehousing? Provide advantages and…
A: Data quality is a term that describes a dataset total value as a consequence of its capacity to be…
Q: what kinds of data from existing studies does Porter suggest being gathered
A: The most popular techniques of doing competitive business intelligence all have one thing in common,…
Q: In survey research, why do bad questions generate bad data??
A: Market research is a process that deals with the collection and interpretation of data to solve a…
Q: How can you determine which evaluative criteriaconsumers use?
A: Every consumer has his/her criteria to select a product and evaluate its performance. These criteria…
Q: How important do you think data quality is to data warehousing's success? What are the benefits of…
A: Data Quality:- Data Quality refers to the extent to which internal characteristics (e.g., accuracy,…
Q: Compare the use of questionnaire and the use of semi-structured interviews for addressing a research…
A: QUESTIONNAIRE SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS (1) Definition : The research experiment that involves a…
Q: Briefly discuss the main differences between qualitative and quantitative data ( maximum150 words…
A: The data can be segmented into two parts according to the features possessed by the variables or…
Q: Six characteristics characterize the quality of data.
A: Data quality is defined as the measure of how well suited a data set is to serve the purpose. Data…
Q: What is the best method for investigating cause-and-effect relationships? o an observational study O…
A: A performance appraisal is a review of an employee's performance and overall contribution to a…
Q: variation is a variation whose cause cannot be identified. Select one: O a. Theoretical O b.…
A: Quality control is described as a process in which the main objective of a production process is to…
Q: . Prepare a scatter diagram for each of these data sets and then express in words the apparent…
A:
Q: what is the objective of data analysis?
A: The objective of data analysis is to find meaning in data so that the derived awareness can be used…
Q: Six factors are used to assess the quality of data.
A: Accuracy : Among marketers who purchase demographic data, 84% say that accuracy is vital to their…
Q: Why do you think data quality is so important in data warehousing? Describing excellent data's…
A: Data quality is important in data warehousing because of the following reasons-
Q: Based on any collecttion data, what are the strengths and weaknesses of your data collection based…
A: Various modes of data collection are handled by responsive management. Each mode has its own…
When we consider data quality, what are the differences
among validity, reliability, and representativeness? How
can you know the data have high levels of these characteristics?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
- Cousins Jeri Lynn DeBose, Tish Hoover, and Josephine (Joey) Parks looked forward to meeting up during the Christmas holidays to compare notes on the results of midyear teacher evaluations. All were public school teachers in districts scattered over the state. In the pressured search for new levels of teacher accountability demanded by legislators, the state department of education joined 16 other States in implementing a new teacher evaluation system. The goal is to hold teachers account-able for student learning progress in the classroom. Under the guidance of the National Council for Teacher Quality, criteria varies by State, but in most cases, 40 percent of each teacher's accountability score would be based on the principal's evaluation and ranking based on personal observation, 30 percent would be based on personal observation by a master teacher from outside the district, and the Other 30 percent would be based on student test score gains. The state department of education would set a performance goal each school district, and the principal would set a performance goal for each teacher. In preparation, the State conducted intensive training sessions for principals and designated master teachers who would conduct the evaluations based on four class observations per teacher. Officials used standardized achievement tests to derive value-added scores that measure student learning over the year. Teacher ratings were 1-5, with I am being the lowest and 5 representing near perfection. The publication of the first year's evaluations stirred interest and controversy, particularly among teachers who worried about the possible long-term effects on job retention and tenure. Now, with the first-year evaluations in hand, the three cousins pored over their experiences. The three represented different types of school systems within the state. Jeri Lynn worked for a metropolitan system in the state capital. The system included many low-income students whose first language was nor English, and several schools within the system were teetering on the brink of State takeover if improvement in student scores didn't materialize this school year. Tish worked in a county System dominated by upper-income residents, and Joey taught in the rural community in which all three grew up. The rural community had high unemployment, and a low percentage of graduates went on to college. As a result, the cousins came to the table with differing teaching experiences. "The numbers are all over the place," Jeri Lynn remarked as she studied the pages. "The whole system is flawed, and they need to make changes," Joey said. " It's too subjective. The principal and master teacher observations are subjective because there are personal factors that affect a true outcome." "Yeah, look at the numbers from your upper-income district," Jeri Lynn said to Tish. " How can 60 percent of the teachers score 5s?" Tish chuckled. "Yeah, lucky us. Our schools are overflowing with children from wealthy families. These are the kids who will apply to Ivy League schools. I can tell you that the principals are going to avoid confrontation on all fronts. No principal is going to give any indication that their students are receiving an education that's less than perfect, and that means cramming the rankings with 5s. They claim a higher level of motivation for students, and thus the selection of an elite team of educators. So with those pressures, I don't think we get personal feedback that IS accurate." "At the other end of the spectrum, we have my rural district," Joey said. "The big problem is that the principals know everyone and have longstanding relationships with everyone in the county, so I think scores are based on personal history. We could almost predict who would get high or low scores before the observations. For principals, it can go back as far as 'his daddy and my daddy hated each other in high school, and now I get to evaluate his daughter." "I think that in many cases, principals feel pressure to align scores with state expectations. The stare expected my district to have high scores and expected rural schools such as yours to be lower," Tish said. "But isn't that partially offset by lower goals for the rural school distracts responded Joey. "The key to the accountability system is the principal in each school," Jeri Lynn suggested. "With several of the schools in Metro teetering on the edge of state takeover by the end of the year, we had lots of strict principals who wanted to hold our feet to the fire with lower scores." "I thought the whole idea was to provide the teachers With feedback so that we would know the areas where we need improvement," Tish said. "The principals were supposed to conduct two observations in the fall and two more in the spring," Jeri Lynn said. think that's asking too much of them when they already have so much on their plates. I think a lot of them are skimping on their visits. know I only had one observation last semester, and I'm sure Mr. Talley just faked the second set of numbers. The master teachers make only two observations a year, which may be more objective but counts for less." "I'm wondering, too, how a principal measure performance in a course area outside his area of expertise, such as math," Joey said. "If the guy has a phobia about math, anything the teacher says or does is going to 100k brilliant—thus a 5." Tish and Jeri Lynn looked at each other and laughed. Maybe we picked the wrong subjects," Tish said. "My question is one of perception," Jeri Lynn said. "A large percentage of my students are ELL. That affects their scores. How do you measure a 3 in my situation against a 5 for Tish? At the end of the school year, little Carlos is thrilled that his reading in English has improved, but there's no Big Bang here. a slow steady improvement that may not actually show up in big strides for a couple of years." "So, the question is how do they create a system that is fair?" Tish asked. "And accurate," added Jeri Lynn. Is a 1-5 grading System by principals and master teachers a valuable part of a feedback control system for teachers? Why?Cousins Jeri Lynn DeBose, Tish Hoover, and Josephine (Joey) Parks looked forward to meeting up during the Christmas holidays to compare notes on the results of midyear teacher evaluations. All were public school teachers in districts scattered over the state. In the pressured search for new levels of teacher accountability demanded by legislators, the state department of education joined 16 other States in implementing a new teacher evaluation system. The goal is to hold teachers account-able for student learning progress in the classroom. Under the guidance of the National Council for Teacher Quality, criteria varies by State, but in most cases, 40 percent of each teacher's accountability score would be based on the principal's evaluation and ranking based on personal observation, 30 percent would be based on personal observation by a master teacher from outside the district, and the Other 30 percent would be based on student test score gains. The state department of education would set a performance goal each school district, and the principal would set a performance goal for each teacher. In preparation, the State conducted intensive training sessions for principals and designated master teachers who would conduct the evaluations based on four class observations per teacher. Officials used standardized achievement tests to derive value-added scores that measure student learning over the year. Teacher ratings were I —5, with I am being the lowest and 5 representing near perfection. The publication of the first year's evaluations stirred interest and controversy, particularly among teachers who worried about the possible long-term effects on job retention and tenure. Now, with the first-year evaluations in hand, the three cousins pored over their experiences. The three represented different types of school systems within the state. Jeri Lynn worked for a metropolitan system in the state capital. The system included many low-income students whose first language was nor English, and several schools within the system were teetering on the brink of State takeover if improvement in student scores didn't materialize this school year. Tish worked in a county System dominated by upper-income residents, and Joey taught in the rural community in which all three grew up. The rural community had high unemployment, and a low percentage of graduates went on to college. As a result, the cousins came to the table with differing teaching experiences. "The numbers are all over the place," Jeri Lynn remarked as she studied the pages. "The whole system is flawed, and they need to make changes," Joey said. " It's too subjective. The principal and master teacher observations are subjective because there are personal factors that affect a true outcome." "Yeah, look at the numbers from your upper-income district," Jeri Lynn said to Tish. "How can 60 percent of the teachers score 5s?" Tish chuckled. "Yeah, lucky us. Our schools are overflowing with children from wealthy families. These are the kids who will apply to Ivy League schools. I can tell you that the principals are going to avoid confrontation on all fronts. No principal is going to give any indication that their students are receiving an education that's less than perfect, and that means cramming the rankings with 5s. They claim a higher level of motivation for students, and thus the selection of an elite team of educators. So with those pressures, I don't think we get personal feedback that IS accurate." "At the other end of the spectrum, we have my rural district," Joey said. "The big problem is that the principals know everyone and have longstanding relationships with everyone in the county, so I think scores are based on personal history. We could almost predict who would get high or low scores before the observations. For principals, it can go back as far as his daddy and my daddy hated each other in high school, and now I get to evaluate his daughter "I think that in many cases, principals feel pressure to align scores with state expectations. The stare expected my district to have high scores and expected rural schools such as yours to be lower," Tish said. "But isn't that partially offset by lower goals for the rural school distracts responded Joey. "The key to the accountability system is the principal in each school," Jeri Lynn suggested. "With several of the schools in Metro teetering on the edge of state takeover by the end of the year, we had lots of strict principals who wanted to hold our feet to the fire with lower scores." "l thought the whole idea was to provide the teachers With feedback so that we would know the areas where we need improvement," Tish said. "The principals were supposed to conduct two observations in the fall and two more in the spring," Jeri Lynn said. think that's asking too much of them when they already have so much on their plates. I think a lot of them are skimping on their visits. know I only had one observation last semester, and I'm sure Mr. Talley just faked the second set of numbers. The master teachers make only two observations a year, which may be more objective but counts for less." "I'm wondering, too, how a principal measure performance in a course area outside his area of expertise, such as math," Joey said. "If the guy has a phobia about math, anything the teacher says or does is going to 100k brilliant—thus a 5." Tish and Jeri Lynn looked at each other and laughed. Maybe we picked the wrong subjects," Tish said. "My question is one of perception," Jeri Lynn said. "A large percentage of my students are ELL. That affects their scores. How do you measure a 3 in my situation against a 5 for Tish? At the end of the school year, little Carlos is thrilled that his reading in English has improved, but there's no Big Bang here. a slow steady improvement that may not actually show up in big strides for a couple of years: "So, the question is how do they create a system that is fair?" Tish asked. "And accurate," added Jeri Lynn. What do you see as the major strengths and flaws in the feedback control system used in the schools in this scenario? What changes do you recommend to overcome the flaws?Create a Group Control System Step 1 Form into groups of three to five students. Each group will assume that another student group has been given an assignment of writing a major paper that will involve research by individual group members that will be integrated into the final paper. Each group member has to do his or her part. Step 2 Your assignment is to develop a list of rules and identify some statistics by which to control the behavior of members in that group. Brainstorm and discuss potential rules to govern member behavior and consequences for breaking those rules. Step 3. first, select the five rules that you think are most important for governing group member behavior. Consider the following situations that rules might cover: arriving late for a meeting; missing a meeting; failing to complete a work assignment; disagreements about desired quality of work; how to resolve conflicts about paper content; differences in participation, such as one person doing all the talking and someone else talking hardly at all; how to handle meetings that Start late; the use of an agenda and handling deviations from the agenda; and any other situation that your group thinks a rule should cover that your group thinks a rule should cover.
- Briefly discuss the main differences between qualitative and quantitative data ( maximum150 words only).What factors contribute to the erroneous nature of the data? Is there anything specific you'd want to learn about any of them?There are a variety of methods of data collection in qualitative research, including observations, textual or visual analysis (e.g. from books or videos) and interviews (individual or group). However, the most common methods used, particularly in humanities and social science research, are interviews and focus group discussions.From the forerunning commentary, briefly outline the step-by-step procedures you would take for the following qualitative data collection methods when conducting your study:QUESTION 1.1Google meet interviewsQUESTION 1.2Participant observationsQUESTION 1.3Structured interviewsQUESTION 1.4Focus group discussions via Google MeetQUESTION 1.5.Direct observations
- How important do you think data quality is to data warehousing's success? What are the benefits of having access to high-quality data and what signs point to it?What are some of the reasons why you believe that the quality of the data is one of the most significant parts of data warehousing? Describe the advantages of having excellent data as well as the signs of such.Find out some primary and secondary data sources? Find out some published and unpublished secondary data collection resources? Find out some data classification vendors? Find out some benefits of data classification?
- Consider, for instance, the scenario wherein one endeavors to stimulate contemplation regarding the establishment of a data warehouse. What is the importance of multidimensional data analysis for individuals or organizations? Can the benefits be succinctly summarized in this manner?Explain how you will collect the data to analyze a qualitative research question. Will you be designing a questionnaire or use archival data? What are the theoretical definitions of variables that will be measured? How will you address questions regarding reliability and validity?4. Explain the difference between the direct and indirect in collecting data and give one example each.