which qualifies as “scientific evidence”? It must have been validated and proven to be useful in court. It must be free of any opportunity for bias and be repeatable. It must be beyond a typical juror’s ability to understand and it must be relevant to the case. It must be generally accepted by the relevant scientific community and have a known error rate. It must be based on an approach that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and have been validated.

which qualifies as “scientific evidence”? It must have been validated and proven to be useful in court. It must be free of any opportunity for bias and be repeatable. It must be beyond a typical juror’s ability to understand and it must be relevant to the case. It must be generally accepted by the relevant scientific community and have a known error rate. It must be based on an approach that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and have been validated.

Nutrition Now

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337415408

Author:Brown

Publisher:Brown

Chapter3: Ways Of Knowing About Nutrition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

the foundation of reseach is which of the following Evidence, Documentation, critical thinking , scientific method
Research design is important because it provides the overall structure of a research project. true or false
Is the following claim true or false: science, and inquiry more generally, is a normative activity.
The process of helps to ensure that a scientist’s research is original, significant, logical, and thorough __________. publication public speaking peer review the scientific method
Which of the following statements is false? A strength of science is that with enough evidence, the knowledge it develops can be established as absolutely true. A strength of science is that the knowledge it develops about nature may change due to new evidence. A strength of science is its conservative vetting process that assesses whether change in the knowledge it has developed is warranted. A strength of science is that the knowledge it develops about nature may change due to reinterpretation of existing evidence.
Match each term regarding responsible conduct of research with the best definition/ explanation: A. violation of ethical standards outside of fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism B. fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in reporting research results C. application of honesty, fairness, objectivity, openness, trustworthiness, and respect to scientific endeavors. D. conduct that can vary between disciplines and laboratories 1. scientific standard select A B C D 2. scientific misconduct select A B C D 3. questionable research practices select A B C D 4. scientific practices
Here is the question down below, please write an explanation that includes exactly why this question is correct . When I say this I mean like (claim- why exactly s correct , evidence-given the information given why the answer choice is correct, and reasoning the reason)
The principle of informed consent holds: That all resources used in the research project must be properly referenced and acknowledged. Participants agree to participate in a research project when they have been fully informed of any and all potential consequences. The researcher must inform the research supervisor of every ethical development in the research project. The researcher must inform the research supervisor of every development in the research project.
Ethics in research refers to the set of principles, guidelines, and standards that govern the moral and responsible conduct of research involving human participants, animals, and the environment. It involves ensuring that the rights, welfare, and dignity of all individuals and groups involved in research are protected and respected. Briefly explain FIVE (5) significance of ethics in conducting research projects.
Why should the procedures results of an experiment go through peer review
Do you agree or disagree with using humans as part of research studies? Why or why not? Summarize potential benefits and challenges with studying humans during research including examples. Provide relevant references assigned reading or other scholarly resources when submitting this assignment MUST include concrete examples and data to support your position.
Which of the following is NOT considered to be a scientific publication?* Evidence based opinion Original research Quasi-experimental research Short communication

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Nutrition Now

Health & Nutrition

ISBN:

9781337415408

Author:

Brown

Publisher:

Cengage

Biology 2e

Biology

ISBN:

9781947172517

Author:

Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Publisher:

OpenStax

Nutrition Now

Health & Nutrition

ISBN:

9781337415408

Author:

Brown

Publisher:

Cengage

Biology 2e

Biology

ISBN:

9781947172517

Author:

Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Publisher:

OpenStax

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

GET THE APP

About FAQ Academic Integrity Sitemap Document Sitemap

Contact Bartleby Contact Research (Essays)High School Textbooks Literature Guides Concept Explainers by Subject Essay Help Mobile App

GET THE APP

Privacy

Your CA Privacy Rights

Your NV Privacy Rights

About Ads

Manage My Data

bartleby, a Learneo, Inc. business

	It must have been validated and proven to be useful in court.
	It must be free of any opportunity for bias and be repeatable.
	It must be beyond a typical juror’s ability to understand and it must be relevant to the case.
	It must be generally accepted by the relevant scientific community and have a known error rate.
	It must be based on an approach that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal and have been validated.