You are given the following sentences in propositional logic. Convert them to CNF and prove that "C A - D" is entailed by the sentences using resolution with refutation. Show the steps in the resolution proof. 1. - A=(B v C) 2. A = B 3. - (- B = D)

You are given the following sentences in propositional logic. Convert them to CNF and prove that "C A - D" is entailed by the sentences using resolution with refutation. Show the steps in the resolution proof. 1. - A=(B v C) 2. A = B 3. - (- B = D)

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: Use De Morgan's law for quantified statements and the laws of propositional logic to show the…

A: Given: Use De Morgan's law for quantified statements and the laws of propositional logic to show the…

Q: How can the Wumpus world rule that all cells surrounding corner cell (1,1) will have a stench if the…

A: Answer is given below-

Q: Prove that implication is transitive in the propositional calculus, that is, that ((P → Q) ∧ (Q →…

A: Propositional calculus are basically used to prove statements are true or false.It consists of…

Q: Determine the expression tree for the proposition and its truth table. Draw its original…

A: Given Determine the expression tree for the proposition and its truth table. Draw its original…

Q: Determine the expression tree for the proposition and its truth table. Draw its original…

A: Given. Determine the expression tree for the proposition and its truth table. Draw its original…

Q: Write a propositional formula y with variables p, q,r in the conjunctive normal form that has…

A: As you have posted multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. From the given 3…

Q: using the six axioms, modus ponens and the deduction theorem, write a proof outline. EP → Q:→: R Q.…

Q: Let Γ be a set of sentences of L1 (the language of propositional logic) and let φ be a sentence of…

A: Let Γ be a set of sentences of L1 and φ a sentence of L1. The argument with all sentences in Γ as…

Q: 2. Translate the following sentences into logic. a. It is easy to drive when it does not rain or…

A: NOTE: ACCORDING TO COMPANY POLICY WE CAN ONLY SOLVE 1 QUESTION. YOU CAN RESUBMIT THE QUESTION AGAIN…

Q: Give the complete truth table of the following propositional form: ( ( p ∨ q ) → r ) ↔ ( ( p → q…

A: p q r p∨q (p∨q)→r p→q p→r (p→q)∨(p→r) ((p∨q) → r) ↔ (p→q)∨(p→r) F F F F T T T T T F F T F T T T…

Q: Suppose A, B, and C are propositions. Using only the logical operations of conjunction, disjunction…

A: Here either A and B or B and C and A and C will be True.

Q: Is the statement ∼(p∨q)∧p a tautology, contradiction, or neither? Group of answer choices Tautology…

A: Introduction: It is important to note that "a tautology is a formula that is "always true," that…

Q: Consider the following “proof" 1: a ^ (¬a → b) (Premise) 2: a ^ (¬a V b) (Implication, 1) 3: (a ^…

A: The statements given are : 1: a ∧ ( ¬a -> b ) ( Premise ) 2: a ∧ ( ¬a v b ) ( Implication, 1 )…

Q: 3. Simplify the given proposition using Logical Equivalence rules and determine if it is a…

Q: i. Marcus was a man. ii. All man are person. iii. Marcus was a Pompeian. iv. All Pompeians were…

A: Lets see the solution.

Q: Prove within the system of sentential logic that "anything follows from a contradiction, i.e., prove…

A: Hi Dear!! Please give positive feedback!! According to Bartleby guidelines, I have answered one…

Q: Prove that r V (¬r → p) is a tautology by applying the laws of propositional logic. Enclose math…

A: We know that preposition is a tautology when the expression is always and always true in every…

Q: Question 2: Consider the following premises: 1. A - (B - A) is a Theorem of Propositional…

A: Given The answer is given below.

Q: 1. The compound propositions p and q are called logically equivalent if is a tautology. a. p + q b.…

A: As per our guidlines we are supposed to answer only three question as they are similar kindly post…

Q: Prove that (p V q) → (p^ q) and p are logically equivalent by applying the laws of propositional…

A: We are going to prove (~p v q) -> (p ^ q) and p are logically equivalent using laws of…

Q: 1.) Use truth table for each compound proposition so as to prove their equivalence a.) […

Q: Let W1, W2, W be wffs in Propositional Logic. (i) Prove that W1, W2 = W A F (Wi→ (W2 → W)). (ii)…

A: Let be WFFs in Propositional Logic. Now,…

Q: Suppose you are given some facts in First-Order Logics: a) kevin is a professor b) All professors…

A: First-Order Logics : a, b, g and h are sufficient to prove that:-"john is not Kevin's friend."…

Q: 1. The compound proposition p ^ (p V q) is logically equivalent to а) р b) q с) р Vq d) р^9

A: Introduction of Propositional Logic Propositional logic, also known as statement logic, is the…

Q: Use truth tables to prove the following distributive properties for propositional logic. (a) p ∧ (q…

A: Is p ∧ (q ∨ r) logically equivalent to (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)? p q r p∧q p∧r (p∧q)∨ (p∧r)…

Q: Translate the following arguments into Quantifier Logic and prove their validity. You may use…

A: Summary: In this question, we need to translate the given argument into Quantifier Logic and we need…

Q: Tell whether the nature of proposition is a Tautology, Contradiction or Contingency. Please create a…

Q: You are awesome, in your own words how would you Explain in a sentence how to use a natural…

A: The answer is given below.

Q: there any connection between V and 3 in First-Order Logic (FOL)? Justify your answer with a…

A: It is defined as Propositional logic that deals with “facts”, statements that may or may not be true…

Q: etermine whether the following propositional for

A: Dear Student, Here we will apply De-Morgan's Law to check whether the two propositional logic are…

Q: use propositional logic to see if the argument is valid (A ∧ B) ∧ (B → A’) → (C ∧ B’) A ∧ B…

A: Here in this question we have given a logical statement and we have asked to show that this is valid…

Q: . Use propositional logic (direct or indirect proof) to prove the following theorems: a. ¬ (? ∨ ¬?)…

Q: Please Help with the question below: Suppose you are given some facts in First-Order Logics: a) Andi…

A: The statement or sentence is broken down into subject or predicate , first order logic is…

Q: {Fearful(abigail), ¬Fearful(barney)F4, ¬VX(X(abigail) →X(barney)).

A: Abigail is not fearful of Barney. If Abigail is not fearful of Barney, then Barney is not fearful.…

Q: Consider the assertions "Swimming is permitted on the New Jersey shore and "Sharks have been spotted…

A: Let p and q be the propositions: Let's call the propositions p and q.Swimming is permitted on the…

Q: Use rules of natural deduction in propositional logic to proving it.

A: Solution 1) We know, A ^ B is TRUE when both A and B are True But in LHS we have, ~ (A ^ B) means…

Q: Prove that the compound propositions pA (q → r) and ¬(p are equivalent by using the Equivalence and…

A: Introduction of Propositional logic: In Discrete Mathematics, Propositional logic studies the way of…

Q: Use De Morgan's law for quantified statements and the laws of propositional logic to show the…

A: The negation of ∀x.P is ∃x.(¬P) Similarly, ¬(∃x.P)≡∀x(.¬P)

Q: Question 4: Construct the truth table for the given propositional logic statement (p → q) ^ (q → r)…

A: Please find the answer to the above question below:

Q: c. (p v q) > r) p С. d. (-q A -r) > (p → (q v r))

A: In this question we have to simplify first the given propositions and then draw the combinational…

Q: 1. К K>L 2. (~N v ~L) ^ (~M v ~O) 3. M→N 4. (0 N)^ (Р .. ("M v ~K) ^ (~O v ^P)

A: The Premises given are : K -> L (~N v ~L) ∧ ( ~M v ~O ) M -> N ( O -> N ) ∧ ( P -> L )…

Q: (a) Propositional Logic Let F be the formula (A v B) –→ (B V A), and let G be the formula A→ (B →…

A: Solution ::

Q: Show if the compound proposition (p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r) → (q ∨ r) is a tautology or a contradiction

A: First of all let’s try to understand what is tautology and contradiction. Tautology: A proposition…

Q: Using the well-known logical laws, e.g., Identity, Domination, Idempotent, Negation, Double…

A: RULES USED:

Q: Consider the following premises: 1. A - (B - A) is a Theorem of Propositional Calculus/Logic (i.e.…

A: the answer is given below:-

Q: Let p and q be propositions. Simplify the compound proposition -q^p→q)→p¬q^(p→q)→p as much as…

Q: What is the difference between ‘⊢’ and ‘⊨’. In giving your answer, briefly describe the two…

A: These are the kind symbols which are used to denote express logical representation.

Q: symbolic form of the proposition

A: Given :- In the above question , the statements along with the proposition logic mention in the…

Q: Use propositional logic (direct or indirect proof) to prove the following theorems a. ¬ (p ∨ ¬q) ∧…

A: Tautological implication : Let 'P' and 'Q' are two propositional function then 'P' tautological…

Concept explainers

Inference in AI

The inference is finding a conclusion or result based on any data, events, and any information. Usually, there will be a set of conditions and the conclusion is made, which satisfies all the given conditions are true. The conclusion is made according to the inference rules. Any artificial intelligence agent or an intelligent system uses the inference engine to find a better result or output. The work of the inference engine is to analyze the fact and figures based on all circumstances. After the analysis, the machine concludes this fact and gives it to the agent. The agent uses this conclusion for further processing and decision-making. Intelligent systems will generate new logic from existing ones based on the facts.

Question

4.
You are given the following sentences in propositional logic. Convert them to CNF and prove that "C A
- D" is entailed by the sentences using resolution with refutation. Show the steps in the resolution proof.
1. - A = (B v C)
2. A = B
3. - (- В %3D D)
→ D)

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

This is a popular solution!

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 73 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Simplify the given proposition using Logical Equivalence rules and determine if it is a tautology, contradiction orcontingency. Do not forget to indicate rule/s applied in each step. 1. ¬(q ⊕ p) → ¬(p ∧ q) 2. (¬p ∧ r) ⊕ (p ∨ q)
Use the laws of propositional logic (logical equivalences) to show the following equivalency by choosing to change one, and only one, side of the equivalence expression. (¬p→q)∨¬q ≡ T
Give the complete truth table of the following propositional form: ( ( p ∨ q ) → r ) ↔ ( ( p → q ) ∨ ( p → r ) ). Is this propositional form a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency?
Consider the wffs:φ1 ≡ p1 → (p2 → (p3 → p4))φ2 ≡ (p1 ∧ p2 ∧ p3) → p4(a) Technically speaking, neither φ1 nor φ2 is well-formed since neither is allowed by the formal syntaxof propositional logic. Correct them. Note, however, that we will freely make such trivial ’errors’ throughout this semester (as do most such courses).(b) Use truth tables (in the form defined in this course) to show that φ1 ↔ φ2.(c) After internalizing an intuitive understanding of this equality, propose an extension of it to n atoms.(d) State the number of rows in a truth table for proving the extension
Consider the wffs:φ1 ≡ p1 → (p2 → (p3 → p4))φ2 ≡ (p1 ∧ p2 ∧ p3) → p4(a) Technically speaking, neither φ1 nor φ2 is well-formed since neither is allowed by the formal syntaxof propositional logic. Correct them. Note, however, that we will freely make such trivial ’errors’throughout this semester (as do most such courses).(b) Use truth tables (in the form defined in this course) to show that φ1 ↔ φ2.(c) After internalizing an intuitive understanding of this equality, propose an extension of it to natoms.(d) State the number of rows in a truth table for proving the extension.
2. With reference to the following logical equivalences, determine whether each of them is valid orinvalid. If it is invalid then give a counterexample (e.g. based on a Truth-Value assignment).If it is valid then give an algebraic proof using ONLY logical equivalences from Table 6 inSection 1.3 of course textbook, and the rule for conditional: p → q ≡ ¬p ∨ q.(a) p → (q → r) ≡ (p → q) → r(b) (p → r) ∨ (q → r) ≡ (p ∧ q) → r(c) (¬p → (q ∧ ¬q)) ≡ p(d) p ∧ q → r ≡ (¬p ∧ ¬q) → ¬r
Using the well-known logical laws, e.g., Identity, Domination, Idempotent, Negation, Double Negation, Commutative, Associative, Distributive, De-Morgan and Absorption Show that the logical expression:q ^ (p → q) Is equivalent to?(qvp)
Show that either the following compound propositions are tautology or not. Proof thefollowing by using logical equivalences identities.
Does the fact ¬Spouse(George,Laura) follow from the facts Jim≠George and Spouse(Jim,Laura)? If so, give a proof; if not, supply additional axioms as needed. What happens if we use Spouse as a unary function symbol instead of a binary predicate?
Simplify the given proposition using Logical Equivalence rules and determine if it is a tautology, contradiction orcontingency. Do not forget to indicate rule/s applied in each step. (q → ¬p) ↔ p
Consider the following Axiomatic System The only connectives are ¬, →The only rule of inference is Modus PonensThe 3 axioms are: 1. (¬P → P) → P2. P →(¬P →Q)3. (P →Q)→((Q→R)→(P →R)) a) Prove the HS rule: If A → B and B → C are true then A → C is true b) Prove that A → A is a theorem
Suppose P and Q are (possibly molecular) propositional statements. Prove that P and Q are logically equivalent if any only if P ↔ Q is a tautology. Explain. Hint: What do these concepts mean in terms of truth tables?