Categorical Imperative Essay

specifically a deontologist, has two imperatives: the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative. These imperatives describe what we ought to do and are only applicable to rational beings because they are the only beings that recognize what they ought or ought not to do. The hypothetical imperative is when an individual’s actions are reasoned by their desire, so they only act with the intention of fulfilling their desires. The categorical imperative is what human beings ought to do for

what he called the Categorical Imperative which are our moral obligations and commands you must follow, regardless of your desires. The categorical imperative will be used to work through the following situation. Professor Miller’s final exam is known to be difficult and you are required to get a B+ in the course to keep your financial aid. You have found a way to get the exam beforehand by hacking into Professor Miller’s personal computer. What do you do? The categorical imperative can be broken up

is also predominately African American meaning the picture could harmfully affect the school because it shows more of the minority giving back to the school rather than the majority. The principles are built around Kant’s Categorical Imperative, which states that it’s “imperative” is something that a person must do. My loyalties are to myself and to those students that weren’t included in the story.

Italian tax authorities assumed that the Americans filed Italian-style and for this reason they charged the bank three times the amount they had paid, and the bank manager was sent back to the United States. In my opinion and based on Kant’s categorical imperatives theory the American

2a. The universalizability version of the Categorical Imperative states to act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. It generalizes the rule to decide if an act is morally permissible. A maxim is a personal rule to guide one’s behavior. For example, a maxim can be to run three miles every day. If everyone can do the maxim, then it could become a universal law. On the other hand, if not everyone can do the maxim, then the act

cosmopolitanism stems from Immanuel Kant’s, an influential philosopher, categorical imperative. Categorical imperative is the idea that “humans should be treated as ends in themselves” (Shapcott 197). If a person is an end-in-themselves, it means their innate values don’t depend on anything else and just by existing they have value. Therefore, we need to accept ourselves and each other’s self-worth. The effect of categorical imperative is to simply yet imperatively treat every human as an equal in regards

Katelyn Cassidy PHI 101 The Cold Equation written by Tom Godwin is a science fiction short story that raises issues in philosophy. The story is about a girl named Marilyn that sneaks on to an EDS, a little ship carrying fever serum to six men stationed on a planet Woden. Marilyn’s brother had been one of the six men stationed there and she wanted to see him because it had been ten years since she had last seen him. Marilyn was scheduled to take a ship to the planet Mirmir where she would see her

Kants Categorical Imperative applies to the story since it is an exclusive story. One of Kants main points he would argue not to use the woman as a means to your ends. (ME86) The woman who came forward wanted to remain anonymous so the Senator would not find out. Journalists

Kant’s categorical imperative, also describes that it mandates an action, irrespective of one’s personal desires which is contrasted with Valentina’s case as she is expected to maintain professionalism within and outside the orchestra to uphold TSO’s morals and values. Although Valentina clearly has the desire to perform for the orchestra, she has the moral obligation to censor her comments to keep her offensiveness to a minimal as Melanson revealed, “the decision was made because of the offensive

In this paper, I will explain the concept of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, and show how he used it to justify why it is wrong to lie to an inquiring murderer. I will note how he arrived at this conclusion, and why I consider it to be the correct moral answer. According to Kant, the Categorical Imperative is the supreme law of morality by which a particular rule that an individual takes as a maxim must be accepted by all rational beings. This universal acceptance is what judges an action to be