Constitutional Convention Essay

The Constitutional Convention took place in Philadelphia. It was also called the Federal Convention, the Grand Convention at Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Convention. They were going to revise the Articles of Confederation but instead Alexander Hamilton and James Madison decided to create a new government. While creating their new government, they had many arguments. The Founding Fathers were thinking of ideas for what to include in the new government. They came up with Equal representation

Raised at the Constitutional Convention and in the ratification debates, there were major questions about the organization of the executive branch. The delegates needed to resolve many questions to help achieve balance between a limited and an executive government. Some Framers imagined that it would be best if there were only one chief executive which would ultimately abolish there being any chance of conflict between two or more leaders whom had equal power. There were arguments that a single executive

At the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787, building of a stronger national government to strengthen the weak central government under the Articles of Confederation was the focus of some leaders. The solution to this issue brought about the framing of the constitution. The framers of the new plan crafted a startling new approach through a ratifying procedure that went directly to the people. By this method, the Constitution would become law if nine of the thirteen states approved it

In the summer of 1787, the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia to create a new government as the one under the Articles of Confederation had failed them. When drafting the Constitution, the framers wanted a Constitution that would favor freedom over equality. A way to interpret the meaning of equality in the context of the Constitution is to see how democratic the Constitution was. The United States Constitution today has been amended many times to give more democratic aspects to the federal

While today it seems that the Constitution and the Constitutional Convention were a complete success, at the time there were many people against this. The people that supported the Constitution were known as Federalists. Key Federalists as the time were James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton. They knew that they country was in need of a strong central government and needed powers not granted to the central government under the Articles of Confederation. On the opposition, those against the

delegates from 12 states took part in the Constitutional Convention. Rhode Island did not send any representatives. Some attending delegates, such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, had been respected leaders before and wanted a central government with real power, and were also well known to the others. Younger delegates, such as Alexander Hamilton of New York, and James Madison of Virginia, was younger, but was very influential during this Convention, seeing that the National Government had

The Constitutional Convention of 1786, was meant to address the Articles of Confederation, and establish a strong central government. This was controversial because local state legislators didn’t want the federal government to obtain too much power. However, without a strong national government, many feared the United States would not succeed as an independent nation (Bruns, 1986). Some states didn’t send their representatives to the convention. They viewed the convention as a plan to diminish the

During the Constitutional Convention, there were initially two plans proposed while considering the representation of states in Congress. The Virginia Plan, which was presented by James Madison, proposed that state representation should correspond to the state's population. This plan also outlined a three branch system with a bicameral legislature and was preferred by large states. On the other hand, William Patterson presented the New Jersey Plan, saying that all states should have equal representation

to Philadelphia Constitutional Convention in 1787. They were initially assembled to amend the Article of Confederation. The convention delegates agreed that the Article of Confederation needed to be set aside and a new Constitution should be drafted. They set about that task with a diverse group of elite members of society. The men at the meeting were from different states, both large and small. Over half of the delegates were college educated. John Adams described the convention delegates as “a

The royal prerogative is a source of constitutional law, it derives from common law powers that have from the monarchy to the executive. The significance in constitutional law of the prerogative is that it provides the executive with considerable power to act without following ‘normal’ parliamentary procedures. As Dicey explained, the prerogative is ‘every act which the executive government can lawfully do without the authority of an Act of parliament. In constitution terms it is therefore important