Court Case Essay

to a case involving a local attorney who allegedly assaulted another man at the Wayne County Courthouse the morning of March 11. The Wayne County commissioners authorized the Stark County prosecuting attorney, or one of his assistants, to serve as the special prosecutor during their meeting Wednesday. Prosecutor Dan Lutz requested a special prosecutor because he is of the opinion a conflict exists in this case, according to the resolution passed by the commissioners. State law allows the Court of Common

mechanism to punish an individual for trespassing on private land Gus, Lindsay J. (2016) University of Chicago Legal Forum. In Katz v. United States, the Court held that The Fourth Amendment’s protection was not based on a property interest and that fact only should uphold the homeless being protected Who Was Involved There were six homeless named in this case as plaintiffs Pamela Kincaid, Doug Deatherage, Charlene Clay, Cynthia Greene, Joanna Garcia, and Randy Johnson, but included were others that were

Would filing a diversity jurisdiction lawsuit in federal district court in the Southern District of Florida result in Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. §1927, or some other violations when the defendant resides in Minnesota? It depends. It depends on whether the court will exercise discretion to sanction. The court would likely to sanction Ms. Rodriguez’s lawyer under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. §1927 due to the motives of “home court” advantage and to inconvenience Paulsen. Ms. Rodriguez has meet subject matter jurisdiction

pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. In exchange for Lunsford's guilty plea, the state agreed to a joint sentencing recommendation to include a suspended three-year prison term and community control sanctions with a maximum period of probation. However, sentencing was twice continue after authorities received evidence Lunsford

The Supreme Court, located in Brisbane, was the original court which heard this matter. This was due to that it was a civil matter that dealt with an inheritance over $750,000. This $750,000 was made up of the deceased estate as well as passbook and shares. [1 mark] (a) The issue of costs was dealt with by the Queensland Court of Appeal in a later hearing. Provide the citation for this later judgment and explain who ended up bearing the cost of the appeal. Explain why the Court made the costs

3. Facts of the Case: A 27year old African American man pled guilty and was convicted on five counts of common law burglary. He was sentenced to death in accordance with Alabama state law. The prosecution presented the eyewitness accounts of the events and the petitioner did not testify. The defendant did not testify on his behalf, nor did counsel present his case. The judge accepted the guilty plea without any confirmation from the defendant concerning his voluntariness of his guilty plea or its

In this lesson, we learn that state and federal courts are made up of certain branches which only can hear certain kinds of cases, called Jurisdiction. There are different acceptable kinds of cases such as constitution cases, violation of Federal laws such as tax evasion, counterfeiting money, or kidnapping, and cases between two states (remember that every state in the U.S. has their own court system that handles these cases). Other ones could be disputes between individuals of different states

The district court ruled against Mr. Comerford’s claim that the evidence brought against him was unconstitutional. For the purpose of this legal argument, Knotts v. U.S., Kyllo v. U.S, and Katz v. U.S. will be used to suggest to the Court that Comerford had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his evening drug runs, and Smith v. Maryland will be used to prove that there is no expectation of privacy regarding the phone numbers dialed. Together, these two cases prove that the government agents were

1987 JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether a complex statistical study that indicates a risk that racial considerations enter into capital sentencing determinations proves that petitioner McCleskey's capital sentence is unconstitutional under the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. McCleskey, a black man, was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of murder in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, on October 12, 1978. McCleskey's

fulfill the requirements of the Visit to the Court Assignment. During my visit, I observed the court proceedings for two hours. Also, during this time I got familiar with the courthouse and observed three separate cases. Each case presented a different issue for the judge and resulted in different judgements. The first case I observed being heard before the court was a criminal case. In this case, there was no jury present and very few spectators. The case was already in the sentencing stage, meaning