Euthyphro Essay

Socrates and Euthyphro uncover when discussing the care of the gods that it is somewhat pointless and not just at all. Shown in the dialogue starting on page 15, Socrates starts discussing examples of humans caring for other things, such as a hunter, horse breeder, or cattle raiser. Continuing their discussion, Socrates also states that those who are considered pious and attain piety are those who care for the gods. On page 16, Socrates stakes a claim about care “it aims at the good and the benefit

“And is then all just pious? Or is all that is pious just, but not all that is just, but some of it is and some is not.” This is the question that Socrates asks Euthyphro at 12a. In Socrates search for truth he questions what part of piety belongs to justice or what part of justice belongs to piety. To clarify that there is a distinction Socrates uses a quote from a poet, “You do not wish to name Zeus, who had done it, and who made all things grow, for where there is fear there is also shame.” Socrates

This broad question is exactly what Euthyphro and Socrates debate about the true meaning of these two words. When society hears the word piety, they think of worship for God or religious fulfillment of sacred obligations. However, when Socrates attends the king's court on charges of impiety by Meletus, he encounters Euthyphro there who is going to prosecute his own father for accidentally killing one of his workers. Even though Socrates feels that Euthyphro has courage for prosecuting his own father

The dialogue Euthyphro is one of Plato’s early dialogues. It takes place before the trial of Socrates. Who is accused by a man named Meletos of corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates admits he knows little about the man indicting him but commends his efforts and says he believes he is getting off on the right foot in the world of politics by understanding and guiding the younger generations. It could be said that Meletos is here to further bolster his future political goals. Euthyphro is here to

“Divine Command Theory in Plato’s Euthyphro” Divine Command Theory is the topic brought up in Euthyphro. The theory is stated by Euthyphro which suggests that the definition of piety is dependent on if the gods favor it. What makes this theory complicated to argue is the context in which it is in. Since more than one god is involved in the theory,it is the reason the argument works so well. Plato’s Euthyphro brings the Divine Command Theory into play by setting up a situation were it can

When comparing Plato’s the Symposium and Euthyphro the method of the Socratic dialectic method is a unifying theme between the two works. We are introduced to both Agathon and Euthyphro and their interaction with Socrates. In both of the interactions he seems to break down their arguments when he begins asking questions to each of their claims. However the differing factor between the two stories was the reaction to Socrates inquiry. Agathon’s reaction to Socrates was one that accepted correction

The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro written by Plato itself touches on the obvious, the Euthyphro Dilemma. The notion I’d like to analyze deeper is the conception that is reading between the lines and looking at how Plato wrote this dialogue and most importantly what he may have been saying within. The whole text is a way of Plato saying that there really is no definition of holiness and there is no ONE key to unlocking something that all holy deeds have in common. For as long as time will

Euthyphro tells Socrates that he is prosecuting his father for murdering a servant. Euthyphro thinks prosecuting his own father is a right thing because it’s a pious action. Socrates then asks Euthyphro about the definition of a pious action or piety. Euthyphro answers “What is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious”. (Euthyphro 7a) After hearing this, Socrates discusses that there are enmities and disputes among gods as well. If a thing is favored by a god yet opposed by another god at

The Euthyphro, by Plato explores the concept of holiness through the vehicle of a conversation between Socrates and an ‘enlightened’ man named Euthyphro. This paper will explain the third definition of holiness provided and eventually probe the question of why a person would accept one of the premises for the definition. For the sake of directness and in order to do this in the most easily understood manner, the three premises shall be dealt with individually, and once that has been done they will

In Plato’s dialog, Euthyphro, what is skepticism and its effects? Skepticism drives a never-ending search for the truth. One simply is not satisfied with straightforward answers, leading to further investigation of the fundamentals of many disciplines. Skepticism questions the logic behind reason, reflecting on given information to find the unspoken reality. However, it is genuinely difficult to pinpoint an exact answer or understanding of a topic as skepticism leaves you with a field of branched