Fourth Amendment Essay

the police swabbed his skin cells from an armrest of a chair. Originally he agreed to take part in the police investigation but he refused to supply his genetic information. So, when the police considered his DNA evidence, he argued that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. However, the court, with a 4-3 decision, decided that this collection was constitutional and the police can collect any DNA evidence as they come across them. Unfortunately, this case was denied of review by the U.S. Supreme

four airplanes and they carried out suicide attacks against the United States. Two of the airplanes were flown into both towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, the third airplane hit the Pentagon just outside of Washington, D.C., and the fourth airplane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. More than 3,000 innocent people lost their lives that day (Soma). The Patriot Act is a U.S. law passed because of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act are to strengthen

RESEARCH PAPER: THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE The Exclusionary Rule Fourth Amendment Yaritza Santana 10/2/2014 This paper is strictly focused and based on the true events, Supreme Court cases that led to the exclusionary rule.   According to Encyclopedia Britannica the exclusionary rule, in American law, states that any evidence seized unlawfully by the police is in violation of the Fourth Amendment (The Editors of The Encyclopedia Britannica). The exclusionary rule was created to exclude any

Supreme Court decided that evidence collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, “cannot be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well as in federal criminal law prosecutions in federal courts as had formerly been the law (Mapp v. Ohio. 1960)”. The Supreme Court completed this by use of selective incorporation as explained by the Court. The Fourth Amendment was violated due to the absence of a search warrant. Mapps’

Therefore, when the case made it to the Supreme Court, their decision was that the defendant’s fourth amendment rights had not been violated. This was held on the standing at that at that time, on whether or not there had been a physical trespass onto the defendant’s property. Without a physical cross over onto the defendants property then it was not considered

STATEMENT OF THE CASE In March 2013, the Professional Baseball Association selected Victoria City, Victoria (“Victoria City”) to host the league’s 2015 All-Star Game (“All-Star Game”). R. 2. The Victoria City Board of Supervisors (“Board”) and the Association agreed that the game would be held on July 14, 2015. R. 2. The game would be held at Cadbury Park, a stadium in the Starwood Park neighborhood in the downtown area of Victoria City. R. 2. Public Outcry Gang activity is a prevalent problem

under the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court first cited the exclusionary rule in the legal case Weeks v The United States and reinforced this rule again in the legal case Map v Ohio in an article by the author FINDLAW (2017). In my opinion, the exclusionary rule is required under the Fourth Amendment to prevent law enforcement officers from acting unethically and within their scope of practice. “The right to be from unreasonable searches and seizures it is declared by the first an Amendment, but

legal in schools. There are many reasons why it should not be legalized, one reason being it goes against the fourth amendment. Why should we have testing in schools when many major health organizations oppose it? All it will do is make teens turn to other illegal and counterproductive things. These are many reasons why drug testing should not be allowed in high schools. In the Fourth Amendment it states that the rights of the people are to be secured in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against

A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed two strangers (petitioner and another man, Chilton) on a street corner. He saw them proceed alternately back and forth along an identical route, pausing to stare in the same store window, which they did for a total of about 24 times. Each completion of the route was followed by a conference between the two on a corner, at one of which they were joined by a third man (Katz) who left swiftly.

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states as follows: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (Fourth Amendment, U.S. Constitution). This amendment was set in place to protect society