Based on the results, the study hypothesis was supported. The force production was determined by A.rostrata during terrestrial and aquatic locomotion using their axial locomotion. During the many trials, A.rostrata used different parts of the body to push off the substrate. However, the prediction was wrong. Originally it was expected that force production will be greater in terrestrial environments. But the data collected confirms that there was greater force production in aquatic environments
HYPOTHESIS NAME= ITULUNGBE ROLLNO= G2015PH006 COURSE= MASW PUBLIC HEALTH 2ND SEM SUBMITTED SUBMITTED TO BY DR. YASIR BHAT ITULUNGBE DATE OF SUBMISSION: 20-03-2016 INTRODUCTION Hypothesis is an assumption which is base on reasoning about the studied of the research topic. The word hypothesis is a combination of two
When I was in elementary school, my teachers used to tell us that a hypothesis was a question that we wanted to investigate in the experiment. In middle school, my science teacher told us that a hypothesis is an educated guess. In high school, I was told that a hypothesis is a prediction of what you think it’s going to happen in the experiment. Now as a college student, I taught that a hypothesis is a prediction of what I think it’s going to happen in an experiment or what do you think is the outcome
Behavior Specialist Hypothesis It is my hypothesis and opinion after the indirect assessments, interviews and direct observation, that Shunaysha is a bright, likeable, young lady who exhibits the non-compliance, argumentative behaviors and aggression, because she needs to develop more social appropriate skills to handle peer conflicts and disagreements. In addition, she has to learn how to follow instructions as given by her teachers although it may be an activity or academic assignment
results mainly do support the original hypothesis. Throughout the 8 days of experiment, there was no lead, bacteria, or sodium detected by the test kits or the test strips that were used in any of the waters of the water bottle brands and tap water in both environments thus proving the hypothesis that was originally posed, correct. This was the same for the tap water from Quincy, Massachusetts in both environments, thus not supporting the original hypothesis of the belief of traces of lead or bacteria
The hypothesis for this experiment would be, if the type of whitening product is altered, will the whiteness of teeth increase? The idea of this experiment was to see what types or products or methods help to whiten teeth better and faster than others.This science fair project is interesting to me because my teeth are never white. I was curious as to which methods of cleaning would succeed in brightening teeth faster because I may consider the options if I were to use a different whitening product
Hypothesis testing is very essential in statistical analysis. It is quite imperative to state both a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis when conducting a hypothesis test because the hypotheses are mutually exclusive and if one statement is true then the other is proven as false. According to Mirabella (2011, p. 4-1) states that, “When we have a theory about a parameter (the average is…,the proportion is….,etc), we can test that theory via a hypothesis test.” Therefore, that is what
The null hypothesis of this experiment was that there would be no significant difference in preference by crickets between environment with cinnamon and without cinnamon. The result showed that as the time increase the crickets’ movement actual become more stable. There is an equal net force of movement from one side of the chamber to another. To test the significance of these findings, a Chi Square analysis was performed. According to the Chi Square statistic, the null hypothesis should be accepted
stated three were supported by the research findings. These three hypothesis were race and ethnicity will have no effect on favoring of physician-assisted suicide, gender will have no effect on favoring of physician-assisted suicide, and those that favor abortion will be more likely to favor physician-assisted suicide. Before speculation about why these three hypotheses are supported it needs to be discussed on why two of the hypothesis were non-direction. Gender and race or ethnicity was non-directional
The null hypothesis of this study is that there is no difference in metabolic rate of gold fish before and after increasing environmental temperature. The alternative hypothesis of this study is that metabolic rate of gold fish changes after increasing environmental temperature. Results From a sample size of eight measurements taken from eight different gold fish population, a two-tailed, paired t-test was conducted to determine the relationship between the metabolic rate of gold fish before and
The difference between a hypothesis and a scientific theory is that a hypothesis is a proposed description while a scientific theory is a proven description for something. The difference between a prediction and a hypothesis is that a prediction is a guess at what the results are going to be referring to the proposed hypothesis, while a hypothesis is a proposed explanation where the experiment will be based off of. A testable hypothesis would be useful in scientific experiments because it is testable
As Sekaran states “the null hypothesis is presumed true until statistical evidence, in the form of a hypothesis test, indicates otherwise” (Sekaran, 303). For scenario three, the researcher could state that the null hypothesis could be "everyone is equal in their respective physical speed ability even one of those people may see their athleticism different matched to someone else being sampled." Some may say they are athletic and really only moderately athletic whereas someone may state they are
we can apply these calculations to our results, we formed a null hypothesis relating to the data. The null hypothesis states that there is there is no statistically significant difference between the observed results from our F2 cross and the expected results ratios we received to the ratios we would expect). If there is no statistical significance, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and tentatively accept our previous hypothesis that the autosomal vestigial wing trait will be inherited in a 3:1
What hypothesis was tested in Experiment 1? What were the general findings of the experiment? The hypothesis involves a relationship between the racial and ethnic communities of a certain geographic area. That relationship is based on the dialect type of the applicant, and on the success in establishing an appointment to see an apartment. The general findings showed a configuration of a possible discrimination, associated with 3 dialects by geographic area. The experimental hypothesis was supported
class, we wondered what evidence we could gather through shell-less eggs so we could show osmosis and diffusion through the egg inner membranes. My hypothesis for the egg in cranberry juice was that the color would change to red. My hypothesis for the egg in La Croix would be that the texture would become rougher and it would become smaller. My hypothesis for the egg in syrup was that the color would become brown and the egg would become larger. I believe with the knowledge I had at the time, that my
Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing is basically a process that uses statistical inference to test claims about population parameters. In hypothesis testing we begin by making a tentative assumption about a population parameter. This assumption is called the null hypothesis and is denoted by Ho. We then define another hypothesis, called the alternative hypothesis, which is the opposite of what is stated is the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is denoted by Ha. The hypothesis
more of a systematic approach with measurable numerical quantities that go through analysis to prove a hypothesis. Finally, the research hypothesis is either approved or disapproved with regards to the results of the analysis (Laureate Online Education B.V.
ill shortly after the picnic. The root cause of the problem is unknown, and there are a lot of variables. By systematically using the scientific method this will enable Earl to find an objective, and reliable conclusion to his dilemma. Making a hypothesis without conducting background research would be futile. I would suggest him looking at his data more closely. Observation is a critical process and maybe he should become more observant. He has begun to ask questions, but only by asking the correct
Discussion: The hypothesis that was tested was pill bugs are use to the cooler temperature of the room and natural soil would travel a greater distance once they were in a hotter environment. The hypothesis is rejected on the basis that the p-value of .760 is greater than .05. Furthermore, figure 3 supports this rejection, since the averages are very close to each other and their error bars completely overlap. This rejection means that once the pill bugs where in the hotter environment there was
Our lab investigated the morphological characteristics of leaves found in the sun and shade on various species of maple and oak trees around campus. Our null hypothesis was Acer and Quercus acclimate similarly with regards to SLW (specific leaf weight), size, and sinuosity. Our hypothesis was Quercus acclimation is greater than Acer SLW, size, and sinuosity. We tested these hypotheses by picking small sections of a branches from both maple and oak trees. A group was assigned either a maple or an