Interrogation Essay

confessions as described in the reading is mental health issues. Individuals who have a diminished metal capacity and those people who are not mentally stable will admit to things they did not do. In the pressure and stress of an intense, extended interrogation y will admit to committing a crime that they did not commit. That

The people working in that Branch and in most of the country believed these “enhanced interrogation” techniques worked. Well after 6 years of gathering intelligence regarding those practices a 525 page report by the Senate Select Intelligence Committee revealed several major things one of which is that "The use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information or gaining detainee cooperation." this is key in

(Anonymous, 2004). However, prior to this decision, law enforcement officials did not have to ensure that criminal suspects were aware of their rights prior to engaging in an interrogation. In the underlying case, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for the kidnapping and rape of a woman. After two hours of police interrogation, he signed a written confession. Miranda was never informed of his right to council, his right to remain silent, or of the fact that statements he made could be used against him

The Miranda Decision In 1966, the U. S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona. The Miranda decision was a departure from the established law in the area of police interrogation. Prior to Miranda, a confession would be suppressed only if a court determined it resulted from some actual coercion, threat, or promise. The Miranda decision was intended to protect suspects of their 5th Amendment right of no self-incrimination. The verdict of Miranda v. Arizona

Review of the following articles: Force Administration of Sex-Drive Reducing Medications of Sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment? And Ethics, Prisoner Interrogation, National Security and The Media Force Administration of Sex-Drive Reducing Medications of Sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment? The first article I chose was whether or not it is considered a treatment or a punishment to sex offenders if they are forced, by court order, to

complete personality measures prior to receiving false projections about their inclusion/exclusion from a future interpersonal interaction then a contrived computer crash will be an excuse to attempt to elicit a false confession with standard interrogation tactics. Those with traits of anxiety attachment or who have been excluded may be most likely to confess. Project Narrative False confessions are the third-most?? common reason for exonerations and pardons (ref??) and fall into three categories:

States considered the facts of four separate cases, all of which involved incriminating evidence obtained during official police interrogations. In all four cases Government officials did not advise the individuals, who were under custodial detention, of their Fifth Amendment constitutional rights. Individuals who are being questioned under a custodial police interrogation are protected from self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment .The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states "No

A., & Moger, S. 2009). An example of a creative artefact is the interrogation scene from the film The Dark Knight [motion picture] directed by Christopher Nolan. The film tells the story of a vigilante known as Batman, attempting to rid gotham city of the criminals that infest it. A new criminal mastermind known as the Joker emerges and attempts to make Batman question his morals ,and beliefs.The reason why the films interrogation scene specifically is creative is due to its use of : cinematography

for the purposes of documenting the interrogation accurately. Electronic recording, while also used with adults, does not violate and lawful rights of a juvenile. There are separate rules for oral, written or even sign language confessions. Under section a-5 of ILCS 705 405/5-401.5 any written or oral statements of the defendant … is presumed to be inadmissible when the statement is obtained from the minor while the minor is subject to custodial interrogation by a law enforcement officer… continuously

confession wasn’t voluntary (alavardohistory). Therefore since it wasn’t voluntary he was forced to “witness” against himself. As a result the actions of the police violated the fifth amendment. Miranda did not have a lawyer present during his interrogation. There was no indication of whether he asked for one or not, but we can assume that he didn’t know he