Machiavelli Government Essay

Sort By:
Page 9 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke have different political philosophies, which describe different forms of government and power. The three philosophers provide insight on what they believe is the best form of government. Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, is a handbook for rulers and how rulers accomplish effective political leadership. Thomas Hobbes’s book, Leviathan, is based on philosophical absolutism, which is an absolute government and Hobbes believes a monarch is the best form

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    mercenaries were not to be trusted. Machiavelli was possessed with the idea that States must be military self-sufficient, they must have armies of their own citizens, who would fight devotedly for their families and way of life. (Hale, 1966) Machiavelli later wrote in The Prince, where he states “the main foundation of every state, new states as well as ancient or composite ones, are good laws and good arms; where there are good arms, good laws inevitably follow”. (Machiavelli,

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli is clear and concise in his work The Prince. He reveals some of the cold hard truths about people of power and human nature in general. The principles, although may seem outdated and irrelevant in today’s society, they are very much apart of the world we live in today. One point that Machiavelli elaborates on in Chapter 17 of The Prince is, “Is it better to be loved than feared?” He believes that “it is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both”, but why? (Machiavelli)

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s “Prince” he discussed the use of fear as a political tool to maintain the state. He argued that fear when properly directed could generate loyalty and bolster the support of the government. He went on to write that fear was only powerful when wielded with care and when abused could quickly become counterproductive and result in being hated by the people. Fear was potent because it was the prince’s creation. Unlike love that is given to the prince and can easily be taken away, fear

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

     Two philosophers that have made an impact with their writings on answering these questions are Plato’s The Republic, and Machiavelli’s The Prince. These two philosophers both had a different approach to the role of the government and their role on each individual. Machiavelli states that the government's main function is to remain in a perfect state. The whole reason for the existence of a state is to serve the people and not the other way

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    6) If Machiavelli was trying to write a good persuasive text, he definitely failed. His tone is so condescending, or desperate, his form is too organized and up kept, but his rhetoric is definitely working well. None of this allows him to write a good persuasive argument however. The Prince has a definite form, tone, and rhetoric. The form is pleasing and organized. He organizes it first into the three main types of principalities- hereditary, mixed, and free- pausing once to address the

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    position that Machiavelli strongly suggest that all Princes should have. Although, there are infinite examples showing Putin acting similar to Machiavelli’s Prince throughout the years, the current interaction between Syria and Russia exemplifies Putin’s similarity to Machiavelli’s Prince. In the interaction between Russia and Syria, Putin mostly resembles the trait of the Prince that Machiavelli describe in chapters 14, 18, and 21 In chapter 14 of Machiavelli’s The Prince Machiavelli explains how

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lastly, Machiavelli is another philosopher that writes in depth about how a ruler should conduct himself, as well as the qualities that make up a ruler. Looking at the teachings of the other philosophers I have previously mentioned, Machiavelli looks at the political authority quite opposite than the two. When it comes to the nature of the ruler or political authority, Machiavelli believes that, “it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking...but when despised

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli lived during the Renaissance period and is considered to be one of the leading writers of this era. Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher, historian, diplomat and humanist, based in Florence and is considered to be the patron of contemporary political science, including political moral code. His most famous work was “The Prince” which was printed in 1532, five years after his death. The main subject of this book is the philosophy of administration (carried out by the ruling class

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    political and civil unrest in Italy. For decades the city-state of Florence suffered several political uprisings and the establishment of new governments. From tyrannical rule to the creation of a democratic republic, and finally the re-establishment of the Medici family, The Prince comes from Machiavelli’s lived experiences in these political regimes. Machiavelli blames the division of Italy into city-states and the socio-political unrest on ecclesiastical authorities and the Church. The Church’s reliance

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays