The Gambler Essay

evidence to answer the question “what is relationship between gambling disorders and substance use in adults?” Annotated Bibliography The article “Pathological gambling and comorbid substance use,” an Australian study done on a group of pathological gamblers who were seeking treatment, looks for people among the study group that also have substance use/ dependence. Of the seventy-five people that took part in this study, nicotine dependence (37.2%) and alcohol use (16%) were the highest occurring substances

Kim and Grant (2001) also used naltrexone (an opioid antagonist) as a treatment for pathological gamblers and was effective. This is because it reduced the intensity of urges to gambling behavior when was given to patients in high doses. Other scholars, Eisen et al (2001) also investigated pathological gambling in twins and found out that they were similar

percent of U.S adults have gambled at least once in their lifetime. Unfortunately, gambling is a risk and the outcome is influenced solely by chance. Many Americans are occasional gamblers who bet relatively small amounts simply for the thrill and enjoyment of the game (Fay, 2012) While others are classified as pathological gamblers who lack the ability to control their gambling behaviors despite the negative impact that it may have on their lives. Fay (2012) reported approximately 2 million

even winning more. The approach a state should take is that of John Stuart Mill, and his “harm principle”. The harm principle allows regular, healthy gambling as a pastime, for it does not cause harm to others. But once someone becomes a problem gambler, the harm

their well-deserved cash, and in some cases the result is exhilarating! There's the monetary upside to sports gambling however there can likewise be a danger when for a few people, sports gambling turns into a sports gambling addiction. For sports gamblers their lives often revolve around it. Betting on sports is more than just making a pick and hoping that it wins. Its a long process that goes into it, from studying and analyzing who to bet on, to the buildup to the game, to watching the

accepted definition of PG as persistent and recurrent maladaptive gambling behavior that “disrupts personal, family, or vocational pursuits” (APA 2000). The diagnostic criteria established by the APA in the DSM-IV-TR are that a person is a pathological gambler if he or she agrees with five or more of the following behaviors: 1. as gambling progressed, became more and more preoccupied with reliving past gambling experiences, studying a gambling system, planning the next gambling venture, or thinking of

when they believe in something. In my opinion, everyone will have their own belief, so they will use their belief to change habit in differently way. Belief can be in religious, luck, love, gambling, or anything. For instance, my brother who was a gambler, and he was successfully changing his bad habit. He liked to go to Casino at least twice a week, and this became his habit. He usually go to casino on weekend , because he believed that his luck will come on weekend. Also, he usually wear red color

multimillion-dollar establishment in order to attract international gamblers especially the Asian junket gamblers. However with the economic

of 1919. Eight players who were getting paid poorly, accepted money from gamblers to purposely lose games. They weren’t just any games though, they were the World Series. It was the beginning of something horrible. This would ruin the MLB forever, and also the players lives. The Black Sox Scandal of 1919 showed that cheating in the MLB has consequences and is still relevant in baseball today. The Scandal started with gamblers, and they were able to bribe players to win more money for themselves. With

Series in 1919 was the first national championship game after the war, and baseball was back to normal. Many gamblers were present at professional baseball games, and players frequently gambled with them. Some even threw single games to gather cash. Arnold Gandil, an infielder for the White Sox, is said to be the one who thought of the idea to throw the series. He told Sullivan, a well-known gambler, that for $100,000, he and some of his teammates would lose the series on purpose. Gandil was getting ready