Collateral

A collateral interview was conducted with Ms. Deamatie Saunders, maternal grandmother. Ms. Deamatie reported when the parents became married, they stayed with her for about a year. The older child Kiran was born. She indicated that the father was working as a painter. Both parents agreed for the father to care for the baby, while she was working. The mother was pregnant and having difficulty breathing. She became aware of the difficulties between the parents when her daughter called her. Ms.

A collateral interview was conducted with Ms. Yelena Halperin LCSW, therapist for Ms. Choi. She has been working with the mother for approximately one year. She indicated that the mother was overwhelmed with fear of the father retaliating due to the mother starting the divorce. The patient found her through the internet. She had to pay the fee initially. However, she is now covered under Medicaid. Ms. Halperin stated that she did not do a diagnostic test. She indicated that’s she performs 30 minute

banking can be seen as a form of regulatory arbitrage that provides important financial intermediation functions distinct from those preformed by banks and capital banks [Claessens et al (2012)]. Some of these functions include securitization and collateral intermediation both of which we have partially discussed. One thing that should be pointed out is that, contrary to its name; shadow banking is not completely unrelated to conventional banking. For instance, shadow-banking complements traditional

A collateral interview was conducted with Ms. Michelle Schneider, Mr. Schneider’s wife. Ms. Schneider reported that there is nothing new in her life. She indicated that they relocated full time to Sag Harbor. She indicated that she works from home, they have met new friends. Ms. Schneider reported that they moved in April of 2015. She stated that Matthew loves it. Ms. Schneider reported that she and her husband had spent more time with Mathew in the past. Things are more stable. She indicated that

since 2008. In a report, US officials claimed there were just 50 civilian deaths since 2001 to 2011. Former Director of the CIA, Leon Panetta, said, that airstrikes in Pakistan made a limited amount of collateral damage, he said it in 2009. CIA and US officials was busy in hiding the real collateral damages caused by drone strikes. The actual damage on property was all ways very high according to the eye witnesses and the local media reports. In case of publishing the real number of causalities,

People have been going to war and attacking each other for years. War is a messy thing, and no one likes to go to war, even the people who advocate for going to war do not enjoy it they just see value in it. Regardless, people have been going to war for a variety of reasons for all of history. A brief look at recent US history would show us that we have gone to war in the case of protecting people internationally such as World War One, retaliation such as in world war two, and even stopping the spread

armed drones can be used recklessly due to flawed monitoring and limitations (Arria, 2012). If a drone operator targets the wrong house, innocent people will sadly, ultimately die (Walker, 2013). However, even if the highest estimates of total collateral deaths are accurate, drones ultimately kill fewer civilians than other means of warfare (Carteir, 2014). Avery Plaw, a political scientist at the University of Massachusetts, took into account four studies which estimated the proportion of civilian

Another significant reason for the use of drones in the Middle East is because they have proven to be an invaluable way to keep our ground troops safe. According to Oestergaard, the MQ-1B Predator drone has a range of 777 miles and a maximum flight time of 40 hours while carrying two Hellfire missiles. The MQ-9A Reaper drone has a range of 1,151 miles and a maximum flight time of 30 hours. When it has a full payload of four Hellfire missiles and two laser guided bombs it has a maximum flight time

Collateral Consequences is a phrase coined to weighing out the side effects of criminally charging a person or corporation in comparison to not charging these entities. It is used in the context of corporations and the legal and criminal ramifications of their fraudulent actions. Holder, the creator of this concept, states that “one of the factors in determining whether to charge a natural person or a corporation is whether the likely punishment is appropriate given the seriousness of the crime”

However if that second missile missed the target and hit a building where it is unknown if the occupant inside are hostile, it is still a justified use of the drone to defeat an enemy and the drone pilot would not held responsible for unforeseen collateral