Cultural relativism

that the female infanticide is not a morally justifiable practice. I do not agree that killing these innocents outweighs the benefits it has to their society. Many arguments that support female infanticide use the Cultural Relativism theory to defend their claim. Cultural Relativism is a theory that depicts how we all have different cultures and different moral codes, therefore, it is impossible to judge another 's culture from our own perspective (EMP, 19). In this way, female infanticide is justified

A drowning child. Peter Singer tells a hypothetical story of a drowning child in his lectures and writings. The story ends in the question of what would you do? You are walking around a pond or body of water and see a child struggling to stay above water. A bystander may be hollering for help. You are wearing new, expensive clothing. If you stop to help the drowning child you will wreck your new clothes. If you don’t stop and help the child could drown. What do you do? He uses this scenario to compare

Female Circumcision The World Health Organization defines female circumcision as “a procedure involving partial or total removal of the external genitalia for cultural, religious, or non-therapeutic reasons(1).” It is commonly practiced by Muslims in Africa and various parts of the Middle East. According to Loretta Kopelman, there are over 80 million women who have had some variation of this procedure. Female circumcision is categorized into three types; Type one is the complete or partial removal

Effects of cultural relativism are largely prevalent in my life, especially in relation to the clash of parenting styles, customs, and cuisine between my parents. These misunderstandings are due to one partner viewing the other person’s beliefs and actions from their own cultural background; often causing me to be the voice of reason or at the very least, the mediator. While arguments about matters such as conflicting lifestyles are exasperating, they along with Canada being a cultural mosaic provide

particular cultures and only then would one be able to be cognizant of them. In the USA, this became known as cultural anthropology. It consisted of everything humans have created from society, symbolism, to materialism. It quite literally encompassed everything human and because of this reason Boas, advocated for subfields to be created in Anthropology. These fields became known as linguistics, cultural anthropology, physical or biological anthropology, and archaeology. Students were then trained in a specific

Moral relativism is the theory that defines whether an action is considered moral or immoral. There are two forms of moral relativism, cultural relativism and individual relativism, which are two theories about the morality of our actions. The two theories of moral relativism provide a reasoning for the justification of moral or immoral actions. However, these theories also present various contradictions that undermine the theories central ideas. Individual relativism differs from cultural relativism

positives and negatives regarding the concept of cultural relativism, but his overall position is that cultural relativism is not a strong philosophy. On the flip side of that Immanuel Kant has a completely different ethical theory that is based around deontology. Despite its positives, cultural relativism cannot be defended against Rachels’ criticism, but Kant’s ethical theory cannot necessarily defeat cultural relativism either. Cultural Relativism is the idea that moral practices and social norms

Cultural relativism is the idea that morals and values differ from place to place, and there is no right or wrong when two cultures' moral sets are compared (Brusseau, 2012). This differs from traditional ethical theories, of which Immanuel Kant was a proponent, which propose that there is a universal code of ethics and basic rights entitled to every person ("Universal ethics," n.d.) In the Case Study Mordidas (Brusseau, 2011), cultural relativism and the reconciliation traditional ethical theories

Ethical behavior is different in every culture. One culture may see something as ethically right where another may see it as wrong. Moral relativism plays a role in accepting differences between cultures, even if they do not agree. Everyone is different. Each region of the world has beliefs in how things should be done. Rules are set to guide them in creating a sense of control over actions. Not every action is justifiable, but there are ways to find out what is really the reason for a certain

Ani Martirosyan Philosophy 305 Business Ethics Assignment #4 Chapter 8: Relativism, Multiculturalism, And Universal Norms: Their Role in Business Ethics The central thesis of Beauchamp’s argument is as follows: I argue that although a relativism of all moral standards is an untenable position, a lower-level relativism of moral judgment and multiculturalism are morally warranted. I conclude that there is a universal common morality, but that it allows for moral disagreement and legitimate differences