Defendant

In order to maintain the quality and high customer satisfaction rate in many service provisions, managing complaint is the essential part which makes no exemption in health and social care setting. There are many statutory frameworks, code of practice and guidance regulating the service provision in health and social care setting. The local Authority Social Service and National Health Service (England) Complains regulation 2009 (amendments) is the statutory regulation provide guidance on local

of the Defendants is unnecessary here. Given their trustee-beneficiary relationship, defendants are of an aligned interest in this matter. Ms. Chaker seeks to assert her rights against both Ms. Lindstrom and Ms. Lindstrom-Blech under the same claims, and would provide identical discovery to each defendant even if they were served separately. Thus, even if Ms. Chaker separately served Defendants with discovery defining “you” and “your” for each individual, but otherwise identical, Defendants would

Johnson further contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to exclude the Notice to Defendant and the OPD Form because the documents’ probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Specifically, Johnson asserts that the documents should have been excluded because they indicate that he had a pending criminal case, and that they indicate that he is indigent. The State, for its part, asserts that the documents were critical to establish that the

Defendants generally are given plea bargaining negotiations “for one or more of the following reason: (a) reduce a charge, (b) elimination of a possible waiver to the criminal court, and (c) agreement for dispositional program… Any plea deal must be entered voluntarily and intelligently, or the conviction could be overturned on appeal (Siegel & Welsh, 2009, p. 504) There are many pleas that a defendant may choose to enter in court. Guilty, not guilty, an Alford Plea, and also nolo contendere, also

Introduction This discussion about women as victims and defendants was insightful. There is a lot I did not know when it came to women in the criminal justice system. As a male myself I could not see it from a women’s point of view. It is funny how a man actually was up there explaining to us what women go through while in the criminal justice system. I think it is really significant when someone advocates for someone, or a group who is not affected by their injustice. Dr. Joseph P. Conti presentation

matter of right. Plaintiff further states: State’s Reply to Defendants’ Response 1. The first two sections of Defendants’ Response only restate portions of the Mo-tion to Dismiss and of K.S.A. 60-241(a)(2), and require no reply. 2. In paragraph 3 the Defendants claim they will be “substantially prejudiced” by a grant of the Motion to Dismiss unless the Court takes affirmative action on motions the Defend-ants have not yet filed. The Defendants contemporaneously

Defendants Distinctive Properties, Inc., PacShore, Inc., Robert Hamzey and Marie Hamzey (“Defendants”), answer the First Amended Complaint of Michael A. Cady as follows: RESPONSE TO PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS 1. Answering paragraph 1, defendants admit the allegations in this paragraph. 2. Answering paragraph 2, defendants admit the allegations in this paragraph. 3. Answering paragraph 3, defendants admit the allegations in this paragraph. 4. Answering paragraph 4, defendants admit that the Hamzeys currently

7.  The Defendants still have not explained the falsified paperwork submitted to the FHA to obtain a loan we otherwise would not have qualified for. The falsified paperwork for a loan's criteria we did not fit, could have only led to one party getting a free home and that party is not the Plaintiffs. 8.  Ocwen, Selene, Allquest, nor MSIII disclosed their business affiliation to us during the selling of this transaction. 9.  We immediately contacted MSIII's underwriter and questioned the loan on

take place. However for a majority of the cases, the defendant failed to appear in court resulting in numerous default judgments. For instance, the plaintiff: Stadium Drive Apartments made three attempts to deliver notices, one being a personal delivery attempt, and the defendant Joyce Russell failed to appear in court. The result, a default judgment, fines of $1149 and $139.74 totaling to 1288.74. There was another instance where a defendant Ramsey had 2 months of unpaid rent, which were grounds

Defendants base their Section 2-619 motion to dismiss on Section 2-201 and 2-109 of the Tort Immunity Act, which immunizes public employees from liability where the injury claimed is the result of a "discretionary policy determination."Hascall v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 121131, ¶ 23. A "determination of policy" are those decisions that require the governmental entity or employee to balance competing interests and to make a judgment call as to what solutions will best serve each of those interests