Franco Zeffirelli Essay

Hatred Between Montagues and Capulets in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet Task To analyse how Franco Zefferelli and Baz Lurhmann show the hatred between the Montague's and Capulet, which is so strong in the opening sequence of their film version of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Introduction ============ Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' is a love story and a tragedy - one of his best

It was the year of 1977; I was six years old and at home with my mother when Jesus of Nazareth movie first broadcasted. My mom insisted that we watch this movie with her. It was a mini-series who was directed by Franco Zeffirelli. The main cast of this series was led by a British actor, Robert Powell, who portrayed the role of Jesus. Due to the fact, that I was only a child at the time, I didn’t really understand what this movie was all about. Approximately, six years ago, it aired again on

play is about their struggle to contravene fate and create a future together. As such, it was only a matter of time before Hollywood would try and emulate Shakespeare’s masterpiece. This had been done before in many films. Prominent among them were, Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 “Romeo and Juliet” and Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 “William Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet.” Both films stay true to the themes of Shakespeare’s original play. However, the modernised Luhrmann film not only maintains the essence of Shakespeare’s

been shown in many adaptations of this beloved play. Baz Luhrmann’s version of this tragic play, directed in 1996 is able to portray Shakespeare’s intention in a unique, modern way, making the film true to his own and appealing to the modern society. Franco Zeffirelli’s version also portrayed these intentions well but considering the time of its release, it pales in comparison to Luhrmann’s version. Baz Luhrmann was able to use the sounds and actions to show the impetuousness of youth, throughout

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a very famous play that well known among all types of entertainment. Its been made into many different movies and plays that have been viewed all around the world. In 1990 Franco Zeffirelli made the play into a studio movie. Although the movie is still called hamlet, there are still many major differences to the overall film and play. Characters, scenes, lines and language all contributed to the similarities and differences between the play and the movie. Although

2.289, 290). It is easy to write this off as her stating the obvious, but in actuality it is interpreted to mean that Gertrude finally sees herself. She seees the corruption of Claudius and their marriage, her husband’s death, and her actions. In Franco Zeffirelli’s adaption, Gertrude says, “The king, the king has poisoned me. I am poisoned,” (Hamlet, 1990). More than just seeing her own corruption, she sees Claudius’ too. Gertrude dies and then a chain reaction of death dies, but before Hamlet dies

Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, is one of the most well-known stories of all time and perhaps the most famous play ever. As one might expect, the play has been made into a movie many times. The 1968 version directed by Franco Zeffirelli and the 1996 version directed by Baz Luhrmann are two of the most popular films. The older version attempts to create an authentic representation of the play, while the 1996 version places a modern twist on the story. At first glance, the movies are

families have took a life from each other. This story has been turned into several movies by many different directors this is the 1968 version and a 1996 version as well as a 2014 play about Romeo and Juliet. 1968 Romeo and Juliet was directed by Franco Zeffirelli, the city takes place in the late 1500s as the original story and the 1996 version looked a lot like LA (Losangeles) well one thing both stories and the 2014 version have in common around the beginning they both are about Romeo and Juliet and

to known how the story may conclude. Many film adaptions of the famous play have been created by director’s eager to create their own take on this tragedy, but the two film versions of act 4 that will be analyzed in this essay are- the 1990s Franco Zeffirelli version starring, Mel Gibson and the 1996 Kenneth Branagh version. Both films are unarguably well produced productions and both are able to achieve their own unique perceptions of the play. However, Kenneth Branagh version contributes an abundance

Movie adaptations of famed works are always difficult tasks, but when it comes to adapt Shakespeare on the big screen, the chore can be quite complex and risky. If the movie is Hamlet, then the performance is even harder. One of the reason why such conversion to the screen can become problematic is that in films there is not a direct relationship between the text and the reader, but a visual representation of the play, hence the director has to make changes, analyze topics more than others and conveys