Juries Essay

all the duties of the judge he is there to act as a referee. He keeps everyone in the courtroom in order. He explains to the jury the laws. After he hears the witnesses and all the other evidence, he will take in considerations all the facts and make a decision based on his own personal interpretations of the law. His powers will be shared with the jury. The jury or jurors "are randomly drawn from the court's geographical area- typically from voter and motor vehicle registration lists-to evaluate

court as jurors. In this way, the trepidation is that the TV show is at last influencing the results of trials - and not in a great manner. Criminal justice researchers have started to study the inquiry of whether nationals who are called to serve on juries bring unreasonable desires and convictions to the court as a consequence of TV projects. The impact that these projects may have on the jurors, their desires, and their choices is known as the CSI effect. Less frequently, individuals will allude

justice? In his plays, starting with Agamemnon, the Achaeans slowly emerge and evolve from an older, more primitive autocratic form of justice, to a new concept of justice devised by Athena. The trilogy culminates in hung jury trial, and eventually Orestes absolution. The jury trial at the end of The Furies implies that justice is arbitrary, must include deliberation, and is more than an eye for an eye. In ancient Greece law of retaliation was similar to the eye for an eye concept. Because Clytemnestra

because of his race and did not receive a fair trial because the jury had formed adverse opinions of him prior to the presentation of any evidence. Prejudice is “an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge” (Prejudice); according to Lystra Moore Richardson of Yale University: “prejudice… was part of the very fiber of Southern life [during the Great Depression].” With these two pieces of

Making Justice More Just: Intelligence and its Role in the Jury System Warren N. Tucker John Hardin High School  Abstract This article examines the jury system and the need to make changes. It explains briefly, what a jury is and how it works. I propose that all jurors should be made to pass an intelligence test prior to trial. Then, the opinions of the opposition are addressed, followed by some reasons why jurors should not have their intelligence tested. Finally, I explore the many reasons

therefore include a jury)). The judge will often question the witness him or herself in order to prevent a litigant in person to do so. The

Victim Impact statements (VIS) give the person or family the chance to state how they feel about the offender and the acts that they committed. VIS can challenge the 8th amendment; however it helps the jury to make a decision on if the person should get life or the death penalty. Most victim statements are not all negative. The victim gets the chance to let the accused understand the hurt that they cause the family or them. Consequently depending on the criminal they may or may not care. The writer

In a criminal trial or a civil case, a jury or magistrate court in England and Wales is required to determine and analyze the disputed factual issues. With such a requirement, expert witnesses in the relevant field are called upon to assist the fact-finding body interpret and understand evidence or opinion with which such a body is unfamiliar. The current approach to the admissibility of expert evidence within the judicial system of Wales and England is that of laissez-faire (Akers, 2000). Within

But there remains one type of testimony that carries an unprecedented weight in a courtroom, and that is eyewitness testimony. Some of the problems associated with eyewitness testimony are that is it unreliable, and it is leading or suggestive to a jury. In this paper I am going to address these issues as well as explore some ethical issues around eyewitness testimony, how it can effect the presumption of guilt, and who should have the burden of proof under certain circumstances. Eyewitness testimony

The CSI Effect: Does it really exist? The Influence of television on impartial verdicts in jury trials Since the year 2000, CSI has been among one of television’s most popular programs. The show highlights the underbelly of a criminal investigation, the forensic scientists who investigate mysterious crimes and how they occur. Because of its popularity people claim that the show causes negative effects. Prosecutors argue that the programs made convicting dangerous felons more difficult and that the