Jury Duty Essay

Criminal Justice Environment 1. Task One. This report will be about the involvement of lay people within the criminal justice system. You will be informed of how lay magistrates contribute to the criminal justice system and what it is they do. Within this report the following factors will be discussed; the qualities expected from a lay magistrate, their sentencing powers, their demographic features (age, gender, ethnicity and social class), and the kinds of crimes they hear. Who are they? Magistrates

Industrial-Organizational Psychology in Film Industrial-Organizational (I/O) psychology is the study of human behavior at work and it is concerned with the development of and application of scientific principles to the workplace (Spector, 2008). In this field of I/O psychology there are many topics that outlined how individuals will perform at work and how successful they will be. Some of these topics are as fallows Goal setting, Selection, Employee Motivation, Job satisfaction, Emotions at work

prosecution’s witnesses and piece together the defendant’s evening on the night of the murder. They accounted for all but ten minutes. With that information, and despite the public pressure from the lynch mob mentality that had gripped the city, the jury returned a “not guilty” verdict in less than five minutes. The Levi Weeks Trial is the first fully documented murder trial in American history. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, intense rivals though they were, worked

The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton and Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose highlight advantages and disadvantages of universal themes in their novels. Both novels portray how ‘we are a product of the society in which we grow up.’ Through both novels we see the vulnerability of certain characters through their external pressures and internal motivations and how these desires are pinnacle to themselves and to those around. Characters in both novels portray the consequences and repercussions of stereotypical

To Be Adversarial or Not to Be Adversarial There are many decisions at hand when advising Mr. Smith to file his lawsuit in the United States of America for his corporation OmiCorp. Within choosing to use the American legal system, there can be many advantages and disadvantages to litigating under this country. Not only do we as a firm need to outline the advantages and disadvantages of using the American Adversarial Legalist system, but also need to take into account all of Mr. Smith’s own concerns

Presented are four separate cases that have been argued and settled in a court of law. Each of these cases represent a different kind of tort, a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, which can be either intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another (Hill & Hill n.d.). The torts are as listed, intentional, criminal, negligence, and liability as presented in the four researched cases. State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v. Siliznoff When a person violates another person’s legal rights

When analyzing the following strategies as a comparison, my finding results illustrate some similarities and some differences; however, these comparisons listed below: Original Jurisdiction consists of the judicial system having the authority to observe a case first before further examination of the evidence needing to decide in a higher courtroom setting. The objective here is to see if the evidence is worth sending up to a higher branch within the judicial system courts or for the courts to waive

to be answered – Firstly how would it be decided what was acceptable practice in the context of the treatment provided and secondly who would decide what was acceptable in matters of informed consent and disclosure of risk. In his direction to the jury, Mcnair J referred to the test of negligence applied by Lord President Clyde in ‘Hunter v Hanley’ – “the true test for establishing negligence in diagnosis or treatment on the part of the doctor is whether he has been proved to be

sides who have the primary responsibility for finding and presenting facts in court. The prosecution tries to prove the defendant guilty and the defendant’s lawyer argues for the defendant’s acquittal. His case is then decided by an impartial judge or jury who does not investigate the facts but acts mainly as an adjudicator who later determines the truth based on the facts presented in court (M. Beazer, M. Humphreys, Justice and Outcomes). This can often mean long court battles which can then create

contribution to the British Journal of Criminology, spacing impacts heavily upon peoples’ ability to effectively participate in the rituals of court, as well as their ability to defend themselves. Furthermore, spacing maps out the specific rights and duties individuals have with regards to certain ritual occasions (1976:50). Upon entering Local Court 5.1, one could immediately notice the power held by the presiding magistrate. She was seated behind a large, raised podium almost spanning from one side