Raising the Taxes on Junk Food Essay

Paying taxes is something everyone does. We pay taxes on cars, property, and on our income. What about the junk food we consume? This has been debated for years that it will or will not work. How do we educate the public? Why should we do it? Where will the money be going? What groups will it serve? Prices are already high, so where is the money coming from? Everything that is done must be motivated because if not, it becomes a fad - here today and gone tomorrow. Only things that are done repetitively

the fact that the food industry has made it easy for Canadians to gain calories. The Canadian government must impose a junk food tax to make sure that accessing junk food and gaining calories will be more difficult. With the junk food tax, the Canadian government will increase tax revenues, Canadians will be able to change their lifestyles and the risk of Canadians having diseases such as obesity and diabetes will be dramatically decreased. One of the many benefits that a junk food tax provides is

the other hand, obesity contends an unneeded taxation due to people not being able to control their weight. Others even maintain raising junk food prices. My own view is to not tax these people, because everyone should be treated equally. Although there are many reasons why a person could get taxed on, a future reason why a person might get taxed is for being obese. Raising the prices

The Key to a Healthier Country Sin taxes are defined as an excise tax placed on any good or behavior deemed to be detrimental to individuals and society. These include taxes on tobacco, alcohol, gambling, lotteries, prostitution, and pornography. Recently this list has been expanded to include unhealthy foods, beverages and legalized drug use. The author of "Resolution: Sin Taxes are Just," Scott Pettit states that, In the United States, they were first introduced during the Civil War, not as a way

if lifestyles do not change, that they will develop Type 2 diabetes or other physical diseases and conditions that are associated with being overweight” (“11 pros”). Give a child the best opportunity they could have. Kids deserve to be fed the right food and beverage choices, so they will be prevented from the high risk of diabetes. Everyone should be cautious on the amount of soda they consume, “one study, for example, found for every can of soda a person drinks per day, he or she is 30 percent more

implementing a junk food tax was proposed by several experts. The purpose of the tax was to decrease the consumption of unhealthy foods. This tax would also generate revenue earmarked for relevant causes, such as; improving diet, obesity prevention, and nutrition education. The underlying purpose is to focus on maximizing health benefits. It has sparked controversy on the levels of additional bureaucracy, interfering with personal liberties, and freedom of choice. Junk-Food Taxes Introduction

the cafeteria. The articles, “Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables” by Mark Bittman, “Attacking the Obesity Epidemic by First Figuring Out Its Cause” by Jane E. Brody, and “No Lunch Left Behind” by Alice Waters and Katrina Heron, each gave complex views on government intervention, taxing junk food, and enhancement

obesity has more than doubled since the 1980s, and today more than 1.5 billion adults are considered overweight (1). Junk food comprises nearly one-third of the Standard American Diet while fresh fruits and vegetables make up only a mere 10 percent (2). In his news article 'Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables ', New York Times columnist Mark Bittman proposes taxing junk foods to combat the obesity epidemic. He says that by doing so will address and decrease the number of obesity-related diseases

to help reduce this national epidemic. Supporters have backed the government’s claim the food industry is responsible for promoting an unhealthy lifestyle. According to Infobase Learning’s article “Diet and Obesity” “Only strong government action, supporters maintain, can neutralize the bad influence of the food industry and improve Americans' food choices.” Advocates of government intervention believe the food industry is to blame for the massive rate in which obesity is progressing. The factors that

Fat taxes have been experimented with in numerous European countries. There are many benefits such as boosting economic growth, improving health and elongating life expectancy. On the contrary if a fat tax is implemented into a weak economy it could cause the loss of jobs due to higher prices. These higher prices cause local consumers to begin to purchase their unhealthy products in different states or countries, causing the loss of business for local industries. France, Hungary and Denmark all have