Speech Critique Essay

Informative Self-Critique As with most things in life, my speech did not go exactly as I had planned. Overall, my speech met the requirements, but I believe I could have done better. I think that it was a good idea to open my speech with a question in order to grab the audience’s attention. My introduction properly opened the speech with a summary of the main points, as well as a thesis statement. The bad thing about my introduction was that I forgot a few words in the beginning. Because of this

The speech that I will be discussing was given by Dr. Robert Kleinhenz who is the Chief Economist at the LA Economic Development Corporation. He was discussing the the recent and future trends at the port of Long Beach and Los Angeles. He used a PowerPoint which had multiple graphs and important information that related to the topic of his speech. Throughout the speech he would use hand gestures, and had a good voice. While comparing his speech to other speeches I saw that his was different from

I believe to set a goal for myself can be very open-ended, with the various outcomes there are when learning to communicate fluidly as well as speak in public. Depending on the size of the crowd or the content of my particular speech and my goal at the end of each speech. To encompass all of my personal goals, it would be easiest to say that I would like to have a better grasp of communication in general and to be able to express my personal thoughts and ideas in a way that is crystal clear to

Speaker Critique of “Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis” Like all great speeches given throughout history such as Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address or President Obama’s 2004 Introduction speech, Robert D. Putnam comes off as a passionate speaker regarding the topic of his “Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis” speech. Putnam’s speech was held in Meacham Auditorium in the Oklahoma Memorial Union at the University of Oklahoma. The speaking situation is as follows, the auditorium was a standard

The speaker I listened to for my outside speech was Ann Simmons. Ann Simmons is the global development writer/editor at the Los Angeles Time. Ann was speaking to my class in California to tell us about her past life and her jobs and what she has been through. The subject of her story was mainly based on her journey through being a journalist and what she has faced throughout her career. Ann spoke to us on March 7th, 2017 at the Oakwood Apartments in Marina Del Rey. Ann Simmons began her story

This was my first online class at Brenau and I was nervous about how things would go. Despite the fact that it was online and only five weeks, I enjoyed speech class and I feel like I learned a great deal in a short time. I will share with you my insights on how I improved; my plan for applying my knowledge in the future and some skills I feel like I gained from taking the course. As I reflect on the class and how I improved I think first to how nervous I felt about having to speak on camera.

I will be honest, the first class of COMM 1000 scared me, especially when Professor McCain began to list the numerous and lengthy speeches we would be presenting throughout the quarter. It was not even the public-speaking portion that scared me, rather it was the numerous time limits, use of only speaking notes, and short amount of time in between the speeches. However, I ended up making it through the quarter, especially with a high grade. Before attending California State University, East Bay,

research weight from first critique to second critique. Since the question on emptiness charge must be taken on more practical responses, it seems to me Kant has undoubtedly realized this and attempted to mingle the theoretical and practical issues in Groundwork. For example in order to disentangle practical and transcendental freedom, Kant introduces another doctrine in the third section of Groundwork. This doctrine is essentially the same as one finds in the First Critique:

Schopenhauer's Criticism of Kant's Analysis of Object Schopenhauer makes it clear that he is indebted to Kant for his vision of transcendental idealism, and that his Critique of Pure Reason [2] is a work of genius. However, Schopenhauer argued that Kant made many mistakes when formulating his philosophy, and he set about the task of uncovering them in his Criticism of the Kantian Philosophy, an appendix to be found in The World as Will and Representation [1]. In this essay I wish to analyse

However, there seems to be a foundational flaw in Kant’s logic that he uses to justify synthetic a priori statements, like the ones from above, that defeat the argument. The issue sprouts from how to think about a term's definition. Being true by definition is a quality of a priori knowledge and also analytic statements, but Kant, in a sense, is attempting to argue that not all things true by definition are analytic knowledge. Consider what a definition really is, where it originated, and how it