Upper Canada

reform in Upper and Lower Canada was created because of the incompetent way the government managed the country, a lack of representation in the government, a lack of understanding of the colonist's in Upper and Lower Canada, and discrimination towards the French in Lower Canada. Numerous colonists arrived to Upper and Lower Canada to begin a new life with a proper government however, the government in Canada did not satisfy their needs. Firstly, the unskilled way the government ran Upper and Lower

American Influence on Upper Canada: Pre 1812 Upper Canada was created in 1791 to accommodate the Loyalist refugees and land-hunting farmers of the United States after the American Revolution. In addition of the existing two colonies, a third colony was created by diving the Province of Quebec into Lower Canada which resides in the east and Upper Canada which resides in the west. The colony was made official by the British Parliament in the Constitution Act of 1791. Afterwards, the colonies became

I. Comparison with the Upper Canada Rebellion A. The Château Clique was the same as the Family Compact B. Les Patriotes were the same as the reform party. C. Louis-Joseph Papineau led the Lower Canada Rebellion as William Mackenzie led the Upper Canada Rebellion. II. Les patriots complained about the same things as the reformers did in Upper Canada. A. Most of the Chateau Clique were English. B. Louis-Joseph Papineau was the leader of Les Patriotes. He wrote the Ninety-two Resolutions in 1834.

The Upper Canada Rebellion was an uprising of “commoners” during 1837-1838 in the Great Lakes/Ontario area,it was incited by William Lyon Mackenzie(Library and Archives Canada), and focused on the issues of an oppressive overseas government,lack of representation and land inequities.However,my research question is, how similar are the American Revolution and the Upper Canada Rebellion? The American Revolution and the Upper Canada Rebellion are very similar with a few differences.The American Revolution

era of Pre-Confederation Canada, Upper Canadians and Lower Canadians showed very different views on the state of Canada. Notably, Upper Canadians struggled to hold fast to social class, down-right refusing to remove barriers of social class in order to remain within the jurisdiction of the privileges of Britain. Consequently, a common view on the country at the time wasn’t that of Canada – an individual colony on its own, but as a wasteland to be conquered. Hence, Upper Canada was focused on construction

of other country upper house configurations. Those countries have shown working alternative ways of how to separate powers over the legislative bodies. The Federal Republic of Germany has an alternative approach to federalism which differs to that of Canada and so does the United States of America. Those two countries have been very successful with their unique forms of parliament and offer an alternative structure to what Canada currently has. The history of the formation of upper houses in certain

Law Society of Upper Canada encounters the conflicting interest of religious freedom and equality. The parties involved in the case are Trinity Western University (TWU) and the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC). Trinity Western University sought accreditation for its proposed law school but was rejected by the Law Society of Upper Canada, who possesses the ability to deliver accreditation for law schools due to its licensing

think about too much, but for the Canadians it has much more meaning. Some historians believe that this event, this success, is what sent Canada on its way to separating from Britain and becoming its own nation. The success of Canada in this war can be attributed to the leadership abilities of men such as Sir Isaac Brock and Tecumseh, the unity of Upper and Lower Canada as well as the need and want to fight on the behalf of citizens of these colonies. The good leadership, the unity of the colonies and

Montreal, Lower Canada, April, 8, 1829 Dear Sincere and Purposeful William Lyon Mackenzie, As a resident of the Province, Lower Canada; I, Monsieur Antoine Andre Joelle, have heard and recognize your presence as a strong-willed advocate and reformer, who gives and finds compassions within the humble people of the Provinces- Lower and Upper Canada. As a testimony to your righteous character, I beseech your support and inquiry into the affairs of the French speaking Province of Lower Canada- our Provinces-

1791, Canada was divided into two parts: Upper Canada and Lower Canada. Upper Canada was where the wealthy British, known as the Family Compact, resided. Lower Canada was where the less wealthy French resided. Although Lower Canada had its own branch of government, known as the Legislative Assembly, it had tremendously limited power. After many Canadians voiced their anger towards this circumstance, the Constitution of 1867 was created (Billingsley, 2013). The constitution combined Lower Canada and