12 Angry Men Interview Questions

It demonstrates that most people put their personal feelings when it comes to trials like these. Even though there are people that will say that they are not racist or

In this section, you should to discuss the protagonist (main character) of your novel. In addition to telling me who the protagonist is, provide some details about the protagonist. Consider the following: human or something else, male or female, age, occupation, etc. Then identify two character or personality traits of your protagonist. Explain how you determined these using examples and details from the novel. Explain each trait in a separate paragraph. In another paragraph, explain whether your protagonist is static or dynamic. A static character does not change throughout the course of the novel. S/he is the same at the end as s/he was in the beginning. A dynamic character changes by the end of the novel. Explain how/why your character is static or dynamic.

12 Angry Men, a 1957 film directed by Sidney Lumet, based off of a teleplay by Reginald Rose, exemplifies various forms of human communication amongst a small group of men. After the court dispute, the jury had been announced to their destination. Twelve strongly expressive men accumulate into a small group in the court where they will all come to a consensus on whether a boy is to be charged guilty or innocent. The group of twelve men that gathered into this small room, all displayed unique and strong personalities—whether it was a strong aggressive attitude, a strong devoted will, or even a strong mouse personality. Their objective was to all agree towards one single decision—guilty or innocent. If only one person decides to say

Sorry I wasn't able to tell you where I was yesterday because I was at a jury and you know they don't let you tell anything about it to anybody. I feel like a burden has been lifted of my shoulders. We came up with the verdict after a vicious and exciting debate. Let me tell you what happened.

The movie Twelve Angry Men is about the twelve jurors that could adjust their influence in a decision-making process for conviction an eighteen years-old boy, whether the boy guilty or not guilty in murdering of his father. It represents a perfect example for applicable of a work group development framework. It also has examples of influence techniques among a group’s members. This paper is looking at those specific examples in the movie and focusing in analysis the reasons why Juror 8 is so much more effective than others in the meeting.

Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom drama that was brought to the big screens in 1957. The storyline follows twelve men selected for jury duty, who are trying to reach a verdict on a young man’s trial following the murder of his father. Throughout the debates and voting, the men all reveal their personalities and motives behind their opinions. Because of all the differences of the men, their communication skills lack in some ways and are excellent in others. The three small group communication variables that I found portrayed throughout the movie were prejudice, past experience and preoccupation.

• What are the ways in which each major character experiences conflict (either with self, with other characters, or with the social and/or physical environment)?

3. INTRODUCTION 12 Angry Men was broadcast in 1957, Orion-Nova production, which was written by Reginald Rose and directed by Sydney Lumet. The story line is about 12 men serving on a jury who has to decide whether to find 19 years old defendant guilty of murdering his father. A guilty verdict sends the defendant to the electric chair. The lawyer also not shows his eagerness to defend the defendant.

Identify the dysfunctional and functional properties of the group in the film as they pertain to the problem the group is working on.

3. Which characters are in conflict? How do minor characters relate to major ones? Are they mirror images, contrasts, parallels?

Twelve Angry Men is a classic black and white film made in 1957, about twelve white jurors who were given the job of deciding the verdict of an eighteen year old boy who has allegedly committed murder in the first degree by killing his father. The men file into a hot room without air-conditioning, all of the jurors already presuming that the boy was guilty. All of the evidence were stacked up against the boy and there were even witnesses that said that they even saw him stabbing and killing his father. The jurors wanting to quickly get the case done with, decided to do a quick vote. Most of them decided guilty quickly as a way to get them out of the hot, stuffy, and rundown room that they were placed in.

12 Angry Men was a television drama written by Reginald Rose in 1954, afterwards it was transferred into a movie which was directed by Sidney Lurmet and finally this movie won Academy Award in the year, 1957 (Evirgen, 2009). The whole drama was based on the murder trial in which 18 years old boy was taken into consideration for murdering his father. The play is about a jury in which 12 individuals from different backgrounds given the tasks to decide whether the boy is guilty or not. This play represents the perfect picture of how people who are divided into groups or teams go through different situation before reaching to the common conclusion (Hackley, 2007). With the help of this play, individuals can learn the workings conditions of the

An individual's past experiences can have an incredible impact on the way they think and behave for years to come. So, the past have a significant impact on an individual. In my own life, I have had past experiences that have affected me to be the person I am today. One example is, whenever I walked through the downtown part of Edmonton and I noticed a lot of homeless people lying around on the streets. I felt so bad for those poor people that didn’t have a place to live. They appreciate anything and everything they get. This really effects me and teaches me to be more grateful in life. And appreciate everything I have. In the play the 12 Angry Men, jurors 3, 5, and 11 prove that their experiences has affected who they are. I believe that juror 3’s family issues such as his problems with his son has affected him to become an aggressive man. Additionally, juror 5 has had a background of living in a slum all his life. Therefore, he tries to prove that not all people living in slums are criminals. Lastly, juror 11 struggles with others judging him because he is a European Refugee. This affected him by making him feel unconfident about himself and feels that the others jurors don't take his opinion too seriously.

“About 8.6% of the adult population has a felony conviction”(Suede). To put so many people away, they make such an important decision they may need more information. In the book 12 Angry Men they could have come to a decision faster. In court, jurors should be allowed to ask questions because: they may need more information from witnesses, they may not understand something or they might need to question evidence.

1. What type of decision was the group instructed to reach (e.g. majority, consensus, authoritarian, etc.)