preview

1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge

Decent Essays

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was designed for a wind speed of 100 miles per hour and a static wind pressure of 30 pounds-force per square foot but unfortunately the bridge failed at a wind speed of less than half and a static wind pressure of one-sixth (Delatte, 2009). This phenomenon raises a big question mark on how this is possible. At first, resonance was suspected to be the main cause of the bridge failure (The New York Times, 1940). After some proper research and thorough investigations by engineers, they came up with several theories on how did the bridge collapse. The primary cause of the collapse lies in the general proportions of the bridge and the type of stiffening girders and floor. The ratio of the width of the bridge to the length of the main span was so much smaller and the vertical stiffness was so much less than those of previously constructed bridges that …show more content…

Ammann, Theodore von Karman, and Glenn B. Woodruff to investigate the case of the 1940 Tacoma Bridge collapse (Scott, 2001). Theodore von Karman, a famous aeronautical engineer, claimed that the motion that was seen on the day when the bridge was brought into pieces was due to vortices. When an air flow passes a bluff body, it created the periodic shedding of air vortices, which created the von Karman Vortex Street (Delatte, 2009). As a consequence, the bridge would move towards the low-pressure zone, in a wavering development called vortex-induced vibration. On the off chance that the recurrence of vortex shedding matches the regular recurrence of the scaffold, then the structure reverberates and motions may get to be distinctly self-maintaining. This wake reinforced the oscillations that were present and caused the centre span to violently twist until the bridge collapsed (Von Kármán, 1963). Experimental results that was deduced in a 1942 report confirms that the motions were a result of vortex shedding (Farquharson,

Get Access