preview

9/11 Building Construction

Decent Essays

The construction of high rise buildings has changed and become more structural and integrity sound. The event of 9/11 showed how older construction and the application of force would lead to one of the most tragic events in Untied States history. Construction techniques that were used in the 1970’s are totally different than today’s techniques. The World Trade Center was constructed around 1966. The building would consist of seven buildings in one. Soon after the World Trade Center would be built, it would face a major event in its time line. In the same year of the building being built, it would also have a major fire on one of its high rise floors. The fire would damage the main flour with some damage to the lower floor. At this time the …show more content…

During this time frame building supplies that were used to build these homes and other projects were sound and a lot more natural and raw than today’s building materials. Using these materials would lead to better construction techniques that were to be the builder’s goal. The total structural support of the World Trade Center would be on the strength of the outer shell or exterior supports. All offices and its contents would only add more weight to these supports. These metal beams and supports that would help stabilize the world’s tallest building, at the time would be unique and different than other beams and supports. “Not only was the construction of the World Trade Center unique, but the tools used to construct it were as well. To erect the tallest building in the world, "kangaroo cranes" were brought over from Australia. These mighty building machines could raise themselves up through the use of heavy-duty hydraulics, in effect growing with the building itself. The building of the Twin Towers marks the first time such cranes were used in America” (Franco). The fire ratings from the 1970’s till now have gone through quite a few …show more content…

In today’s ordinary construction the fire ratings would not be the same. The fire rating would be worse in my opinion. Most of the materials used in ordinary are cheap and poorly made. Materials are made with more make-up products that seem to fail a lot more so than the older materials from later years. Materials have tests now of days to determine the soundness of the materials. These tests are a flame spreading rate test and a heat release rate test. “The flame spreading test is determined by subjecting the material placed in a horizontal tunnel to a gas flame. A combustible material will be rated as Class A, Class B, or Class C based on its performance in this test. A material rated as Class A would have a lower flame spread, and therefore a better performance rating, than a Class C material”(Quarles). The fire rating numeric number scale can go from 1 to 160. The second test would be the heat release rate test. This test would involve the size of an item or product, set the product on fire and see how fast the product burns. When it comes to disadvantages of this construction and the techniques, special consideration needs to be

Get Access