preview

A Causal Relationship Between State Citizenship Law And Human Rights Violation Of Female Migrant Workers

Decent Essays

As this project’ effort is to understand a causal relationship between state citizenship law and human rights violation of female migrant workers in specific, and to shed light on gendered aspects in cross-border migration, which has not been examined enough in migration studies (Castles and Davidson, 2000; Mahler and Pessar, 2001 and 2006) in general, it premises several feminist ideas regarding cross-border migration studies. Specifically, this paper regards female migrants not as mere victims, but proactive agency in cross-border migration, who cross border not only as a company of her husband, but also as an individual worker (Nakamatsu, 2003; Sutton, 1992; Piper and Roces, 2003; Mahler and Pessar, 2001 and 2006). Also, it understands gender rights as one of the important components of citizenship rights (Castles and Davidson, 2000), and considers that citizenship law is gendered, and therefore female migrants suffer more than male migrants.
Following the research question, to what extent gendered practice of citizenship law of receiving country is decisive in human rights violations of female low-skilled migrant workers, the hypotheses of this dissertation is, the more the practice of citizenship law is gendered, the more female low-skilled migrant workers suffer, and vice versa.

Research design
In order to test the hypotheses addressed above to measure to what extent gendered citizenship law is decisive in human rights violations, the paper will look at difference

Get Access