A Comparison Between 127 Hours And 127 Hours

The setting is in two different times but the same place which is a dry canyon with some trees but not many and a blue sky

Is the novel making the same point about the value or ideas as the film? If so, how? If it is making a different point about the value or idea, how is it different?

The plot and the setting of book and movie are very similar. There was a lot of thins borrowed from the book, but there was a lot changed as well. The movie followed the plot of book very closely and portrayed the setting of the book very well. A lot of the dialogue was borrowed and spoken directly as it was in the book.

The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and

best film adaptations of a novel that I have seen. The novel and the film are

He managed to free himself after amputating his own arm. As a result of his hope Aron Ralstonsurvived. From learning about Aron’s and is experience, we see that in dangerous or life threatening situations hope is crucial and essential, as with hope comes the will to live. Therefore hope is a good thing to have in our lives as it can help save individuals.

The novel and the movie share many similarities.The book and the novel share the same problems. A example johnny and pony run away since johnny killed bob.In both johnny gets injured badly and dies.

The ‘tourist destination’ portrayal of the landscape is highly emphasised in Joe’s narration. This depiction of Australia as a natural, dramatic landscape is continued throughout the film, with several other settings and landscapes showing a direct link with this first representation.

Aron endured over 6 days of grueling pain, extreme thirst and hunger, and so much more, due to his arm being stuck in between two large boulders while he was on a hike alone in the mountains. On day 5, at 11 PM, Ralston stated how " they are killer winds" and that it is an "icebox", informing the reader of the treacherous conditions that were endured for survival. Blazing heat during the day, freezing temperatures at night, and everywhere in between, Ralston showed what it takes to be a survivor. Ralston fought for his life, and did everything in his power to help himself survive, because it was a matter of life and death. On day 6, at 9:30 AM, Ralston was on the verge of death. In his last chances at survival, Ralston came up with the idea to "break his arm, so he could twist his arm through and out." Ralston did this so he could shoot the cap gun and try to get help. After this, he performed a self-amputation on his arm, and he was free at last. Ralston faced enormous odds, and overcame them by being calm, and persistent, a perfect blend. He succeeded, and is now a survivor. He is alive and well. Ralston is a very lucky survivor, and he had the correct knowledge and ability to do everything that he performed, a true

The book tells the same story as the movie but in a different way it cuts out thing the movies has or the movies adds thing that's not in the book. The book has some not many similar but . I feel the director was unfaithful to the book.The book and movie version of Our America had many differences.

There are other significant similarities between the movie and the book, so if I overlooked or forgot any extremely crucial points, forgive me.

The actor choices from the film compare to what the book envisioned, but also contrast. The character of Daisy is not similar in the film to what the book

When watching the film, the first difference the viewer can see between the book and the movie is how the characters are portrayed. A notable example would be Carlson. In the film,

From what I can tell Oliver Stone did an incredible job making this movie. There were a few discrepancies between the book and the film, but on the whole I believe

He describes it in such detail because he wants to describe the setting in a way that appeals to the reader. Opinions may vary, but when I read the first page I automatically thought of a place abundant in greenery and animals. Maybe even a forest with a running river. But then later on in the book he describes the setting in a very opposite manner.