2.0 Research Critique 2.1.1 Clarity Clarity refers to the clear view of things, and clear head that goes with it. The clarity of the research can be defined through journal replication and finding presentation.
2.1.1.1 Journal replication
Replication involves the process of repeating a study using the same methods, different subjects, and different experimenters. I personally believe that this journal cannot be replicated due to argument below.
King (1994) explain that in order for a journal to be replicate, it must provide sufficient information which to understand, evaluate and build upon a prior work if a third party could replicate the results without any additional information from the author. This research did not provide
…show more content…
More discussion on finding is stated in part 2.4 of this assignment. 2.2 Theory and hypothesis 2.2.1 Plausibility Wiebe (2010) state that plausibility will bring different meaning as regard to the purpose of study. In some cases, it has to do with determining whether a case study is worth conducting; in others, it might mean determining whether the theory derived from the case makes sense, or whether the case rings true.
In application for this research, the element of plausibility is obtained. First of all, whether the case study is worth conducting will lead to different judgement. For instance, the researchers were too depending on the usage of low response rate of EECS data sometimes make readers think that it is not worth conducting. In other part, we try to suit the researcher’s condition as the usage of EECS data is needed due to limitation of resource: money, time, language and etc. By using the EECS data, at least there is some data obtained to prove the study.
This research able to provide clear hypothesis and it is plausible as their hypothesis able to give meaning to their research question. The researchers stated clearly on 3 hypotheses they try to achieve even it lead to result that need improvement in their hypothesis. For instance, the hypothesis result is not too strong. H1 give positive relation but only in small scale, H2 is not met and H3 only applicable to certain cases.
2.3
The methodology of my research is based off of internet, books, and a survey. My methodology of this paper is clear and
The paper will begin with a Review of the Research. This section will summarize all the information gathered for this paper. Here the background will be given and the foundation laid for the rest of the report. Next will be the Application of the Research. This is
Analysis – An analysis was carried to understand if there is a relationship between the
The findings of this study may further contribute to the body of knowledge which may serve as bases for further research.
Even though there are limitations in this article, it is still useful for the research topic by
Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative methods on each of the elements listed. Please use scholarly, academic literature to support your response.
Significance - In our reasoning, we should concentrate on the more vital information that is relevant to our topic. Moreover, just because something is more pressing or seems more important at the time, it does not necessarily mean that it should be the most significant aspect of our reasoning.
It is feasible that with such research, a solution to the problem can be found. By understanding that attitudes of
1. List the title of the article , author (s) , and the name of the journal of the peer - reviewed journal
Clarity speaks about how clear, accurate and easy you present your content whether verbally or non-verbally and the format utilize. In doing so you want the ordinance focusing on what you are presenting by giving you their undivided attention during that time, although the environment may play a part in how well that information is received. All in all, clarity makes the content easy to read and understand. When clarity is utilized correctly information must be coherence and smooth. recently had to ensure clarity during a recent business transaction in the shipyard where information was not clearly understood. During our conversation, it was decided to allow personnel from the yard to continue working on the boat after consulting deputy
These two authors analyse data in their own parts which avoid the different measurements. This is also one of the strengths of data analysis because these two authors can analyse the data according to what they are familiar with. This paper develops a thematic analysis process and clearly defines the stages such as coding, review and thematic developed. The final themes are presented in the paper using a mind map. The authors also give an example of the process of analysis to provide evidence that they analyse deeply. In the results and discussion part, some data are used as examples to support the authors’ ideas. This reinforces the convinces of the paper. Although the authors do not discuss that they take contradictory data into account, it can be assumed that they check and refine the final model after testing in Urbchester. As a result, the ideas that the authors come up with are credibility enough to trust. In conclusion, the data analysis is sufficiently rigorous in the whole
the info. In fact, the writer cited the references and suggested more website to find more information about the topic. Truly, samples and statics are incorporated in the article, which pursue the information. Moreover, the quantitative method is perfect for the investigation. In fact, the interrelationship between paragraphs is coherence and clear, it has not grammar mistakes.
Clarity is defined as the quality of being clear, in particular. Being perfect concerning what you believe and what you do is a serious step in gaining accountability for your present actions. Clarity permits you the liberty to plan improved likelihoods for future action that will get you to where you or your group wants to go.
The research has been done with carefulness , scrupulousness and the degree of exactitude in research investigation and It must fulfill the following conditions :
It is important to mention at this stage that a research study presented by a researcher may not give complete information about the selected topic. There can be certain limitations of methodology and the new researchers may criticise it for being incomplete. As research is a circular process in which ideas can be added and extracted by researchers anytime, the application of the presented ideas by one researcher are tested and verified.