preview

A Review Of Stone'sPracticing Safer Texts?

Decent Essays

I came to this text, Practicing Safer Texts, thinking and expecting a new method to exegete scriptures centered on the controversial topic of homosexuality. I was not quite sure how food would be interjected into the mix, but it figured to be interesting. Unbeknownst to myself the text was not as much about homosexuality but positioned around a “queer” aesthetic of how one reads the scripture. The queer-ness is relative to being oppositional to how the “heteronormative society” chooses to read or interpret the certain text. It produce or invites a certain radicality, which is seen as positive attribute within community. Interestingly, this point did not register with me until the last few pages of the book. The entire premise of the book …show more content…

Stone’s value of queer relocates the hermeneutic for me to a place of power; it now, centralizes power in being able to see pass the norm. It now makes queer the normative response instead of being the outlier of society. No longer does the harlot, the women or the miscreant become demonized while those who finger-pointed become heroes and sheroes because they told on the sinner. Stone gives us a new way of approaching the sinner without first condemning them prior to knowing their sin. This speaks too Dr. Ray’s book Do No Harm, where people are condemn because of they do not meet the qualification of said person who is pre-judging them. Queer perspective provides change through relationship with bodies as text without exegesis.
Food and Sex I always thought it was interested that my friends would always take young ladies on dates that the bill dictated whether or not sex was going to happen. The larger the bill, the more probable a night of sex was going to happen. It was a unwritten rule that if you were taken to certain restaurants that sex was part of the date. Stone appropriates

Get Access