A Soldier's View On Trump Essay

Freedom is defined as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. The soldiers in the American revolution demonstrated this at the Battle of Valley Forge when facing starvation, disease, and hypothermic temperatures.

During the 1970s a man named Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was leading Islamic fundamentalists to oppose the pro-American Iranian government that was in charge by Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi. Protests were more often as time went on, but on February 14, 1979 Ayatollah took it to an extreme when armed Iranians took siege of a United States embassy. 102 Americans were taken hostage during the event and would stay there for a while.

Over the years, the American people lost trust in the Army Profession. We, the Army professionals, convinced ourselves it was incompatible to society. Furthermore, the “lack of trust in civilian officials as well as significant distrust of the media by members of the profession posed additional risk. Distrust of elected officials and the media exacerbated the Army’s separation from the society it served. The indicators of mistrust pointed to potential challenges for civil-military relations and the trust placed in the U.S. military by society.” (Allen, C.D & Braun III W.G. (2012). Trust: Implications for the Army Profession, Unpublished manuscript) The convincing incompatibility stood firm and caused not only the American people (external population) to lose hope; but the Army professionals (internal population) as well. We succumbed to the controversial stigmatism and plague the American people instilled throughout the Nation.

A poem which I have read recently is “Soldier” by Rupert Brooke. The main point in question throughout this poem is appreciation for ones country. I will prove that this is the main point in question during the course of my essay.

I read an article titled, The Never-Ending War The Good Soldier, written by William Langewiesche. The story is about a soldier who is fought in the war in Iraq under the Alpha Company Wolf Pack platoon. The good soldier (Cunningham) under the military protocol, blindly follows his platoon leader through varies immoral methods of carrying out the US mission, which was to promote stability. Civilians died and war crimes happened, while Cunningham was forced to follow through as the platoon fought for the cause. When communicating, individuals/parties should find the best tools for communicating the issues, questions, concerns, etc. pertaining to the cause. Even though you feel strongly about your cause, act/react morally appropriate so as not to veer from the commitment or make others feel that your commitment is not to THE cause, but to a cause of your own. One also has the responsibility to act in a way that will uphold moral society, rather than diminish the morality of the society we live

Army tanks were first introduced during World War I (Bull, 2002). It was used to provide mobility and protection. Many of the tanks were equipped with machine guns. The tanks were also used in order to extract injured soldiers from the battle zone.

General Grayston had returned to Atlanta with his new Armor force only to find the country thrust into war. He was appalled that his commanders and the President as well as Parliament had moved forward without his knowledge or permission. Not that they really needed his permission, but these were very serious movements by the United States and he should have been involved in every facet of every decision.

For this controlled assessment we were asked to explore the theme of heroes eventually changing our perception of the term. Originally I thought of a hero as someone who does something big to help someone, but I didn’t give much thought to how different people see heroes and how the lives of ordinary people are affected by them, this changed after the 5th and 6th assessment.

Soldiers are trained to always follow orders, and to never question orders. But that belief is somewhat illogical. Soldier's are to obey any lawful order given. But the training involved, the often chaotic nature of battle, and the need to follow authority to maintain survival can lead to a very blurred vision of what is right or wrong. One's animalistic instincts may take over. Sometimes there are such situations when you've stepped over the line. Such as the horrendous act that took place on March 16, 1968 in the village of Son My.

It was a bright, sunny morning in the Philippines. I woke to the sound of birds chirping and the quiet chatter of my fellow soldiers who had begun to prepare for the long day ahead of us. I rubbed my groggy eyes, attempting to relieve the constant effects of insomnia and to force myself to get moving. Sleep for a soldier was a highly revered pleasure, but when it came, it didn’t come in abundant amounts and it often left us feeling even more tired than we were before. Nevertheless, I had a country to defend and duties to fulfill. This was one of the many sacrifices of an American soldier – a position which I served with absolute honor and pride.

One way that the article does this is when it states “The interviews were conducted by a field supervisor with extensive experience in community engagement, training on interviews ethics, probing for detail and efficient management for the discussions” (Francis et al., 2015, p.3). The author's makes it clear that the people who conducted the interviews were done by experts, letting you know that the source of the interviews are credible . Ethos is used in a different way also by saying “The interventions study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of CMC, Vellore; this also included ethical clearance for the qualitative study” (Francis et al., 2015, p.3). Clearly this quote proves that this study had to have very high qualifications to be approved by the IRB of CMC making it credible or in other words an etho

After looking at the context of this film and what it entails, and looking through the movie and having a grasp on what this criticism is of, it becomes relevant to look at the scholarship that examines similar issues that I will face in the next sections of this essay. When beginning to research this topic, there were five articles that stuck out to me with themes that are consistent with this theme of a barrier between normal civilians and the people of the military. There are three main themes that were prevalent in these articles, they include the ethics and virtues, militarism, and the core values of the military. Out of the three themes, militarism is the hardest to understand without looking it up, therefore, militarism is, “the belief that a country should maintain a strong military capability and be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests,” ("Militarism | Definition of Militarism in English by Oxford Dictionaries"). While there are a multitude of themes in this collection these are the themes that lead into the methods and eventual analysis of the film A Few Good Men. The scholarly articles I have assessed include an article written by Robin Anderson about the film Act of Valor and the society surrounding an unending US global war (Anderson). Moving forward I looked at an article about bioethics, but their description of the military core values takes and interesting liking to this topic. That article was composed by two authors

"Any member of the armed forces who believes himself wronged by his commanding officer, and who, upon due application to that commanding

After ten years of fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, military leaders still face significant ethical challenges. Because of the challenges associated with waging an unconventional war, military practices and preparations have not evolved to provide sufficient ethical training for personnel in Afghanistan and Iraqi. This essay explores ethical questions that remain unresolved even after a war that has been prosecuted for more than a decade.

Monica chewed on her lip for a few moments and then slowly gathered up her papers, leaving considerably more gracefully than her counterpart had. He had her outfoxed on the ground. He was more than a capable commander and a clever strategist. He was right, NATO couldn 't change anything on the ground without risking a full scale war.