ADRP 1: Outline And Justifies The Army As A Profession

The main idea of this publication is to create a collective understanding of the Army Profession by providing the Service members the guidelines and definitions of it and the Army Ethic. Fail to follow or even understand the concept of rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad have been the reason of studies, due to the consequences this could bring upon the service. This publication defines the membership and affiliation of competent individuals in character and commitment, five essential characteristics legitimize the Army as a military profession, trust, military expertise, honorable service, spirit de corps, and stewardship. Trust is vital in society at school, at work, at home, among the citizens, trust in the skills of those you depend on, and trust that the mail will be deliver to your home to give an example. American people perhaps have lost or are close to lose the trust in the highest level of government being this the direct orchestrator of the actions perform by the armed forces, after planning and rehearsals every move is directed and now that the population does not support or agreed with many of these actions government has to act to regain the support and reassurance of the masses. American people as society trust their arm forces to perform their duty to protect them and their country, support and defend the constitution society trust the strongest Army in the world due to the technology it possess and the will soldiers have

The United States army values soldiers that are responsibility for their actions and equipment. Being responsibility means being

While these three points are extensively discussed and dissected, it is apparent that the key factor that makes us professionals is the ethical standard that we must hold every individual soldier, from the lowest private to the highest general, to. One of the major points that are missing is what happens when the ethical standard is breeched and how it is dealt with.

Over centuries, the Army established and continues to validate itself as a Profession of Arms. As a department of the US Military, the Army earns this title by providing the unique service of defending the Constitution and the American people. In order to be a Profession of Arms then, the Soldiers that fill the Army’s ranks must be professionals. These professionals are morally and legally bound by the Army ethics to constantly develop their occupation specialties and apply them “ethically, effectively, and efficiently.” In being an expert of one’s occupation and using said expertise in morally just ways, the Soldier creates a reciprocal relationship where being an expert and a professional means living by the Army Ethic and vice versa. The Army as a profession is defined by five essential characteristics; trust, honorable service, military expertise, stewardship, and esprit de corps. These characteristics reflect American values and the Army Ethic. Each characteristic has its own importance and bearing on the Army Profession, but which one is the most significant? Honorable service is the professional responsibility of all Soldiers, it is the “noble calling to service and sacrifice”. As Soldiers, “we contribute honorable service as we accomplish our mission, perform our duty, and live our lives in a manner worthy of our professional status.” By defining what it means to serve honorably, we identify how it is an integral part the Army Ethic, the Profession of Arms,

The duty of the Military Profession as a whole is to provide security for our nation. “The reason the Army exists is to apply lethal

Stewardship of the Army Profession is the last of the Five Essential Characteristics of the Army Profession, but in terms of importance, it is just as, if not more important than the other four. The United States Army’s ADRP-1, or Army Doctrinal Reference Publication 1, even defines stewardship as “the responsibility of Army professionals to ensure the profession maintains its five essential characteristics now and into the future”. Such importance is placed on this characteristic because Stewardship of the Army Profession is the one that ensures the other four are maintained. I sought out the definition of stewardship because despite having spent almost three and a half years and West Point, I was not entirely sure what the doctrine behind Stewardship was. In doing this, I felt like I was better prepared for both this paper and ensuring that the corrections I made were stewarding the profession. With this newly acquired knowledge, I set out to make my corrections.

The question we must ask ourselves is what exactly the Profession of Arms is and what is our role as Human Resource Sergeants (HR Sergeants) what is it that we bring to the fight, what’s our contribution to the Army’s overall objective. As we emerge from years of war, from constant back to back deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq, we find ourselves in an era of persistent conflicts where we find ourselves embroiled in conflicts all around the world. In a world that seems more dangerous today than it was yesterday it is important we remain vigilant and remain capable of fighting and winning our nations wars. We must never forget the ethics instilled upon us by the Army. We must hold fast to our Army Values to which our profession is

Mistakes are common in everyday circumstances, but when the mistakes happen in the military, it could cost a person’s life. In the movie A Few Good Men, two marines, Lance Corporal Harold Dawson and Private Louden Downey, are on trial for the murder of Private William Santiago because they had followed orders from their commanding officer to give Santiago a Code Red. The trial was not about if they were guilty or not, but about obedience in the military. Kaffee had to prove that Dawson and Downey were just following orders from a commanding officer and they were not guilty because they were performing their duties as marines in the military. At the end, Dawson and Downey’s superior officer, Colonel Jessup, was charged for the crime, but Dawson and Downey were dishonorably discharged from the marines. Even though they were following orders from their commanding officer, they realized that they had a responsibility of protecting and standing up for those who could not. In the article, “My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” Kelman and Hamilton explain and talk about the My Lai massacre in Vietnam and how authorization, routinization, and dehumanization were used to commit the massacre. The “Stanford Prison Experiment” was used to reveal the effects of being in power and the struggle between the “prisoners” and “prison officers.” The process of obedience, authorization, routinization, and dehumanization, is used to create the perfect scenario for Dawson and Downey for

The culture shapes the institutional mission, goals and values, and determines the parameters of operation of the Army. The first element of the American Army culture is ethic. This is influenced by the artifacts and hierarchical manner in which the Army is structured. Soldiers are required to bring dignity and honor to themselves and to the nation. The actions of the Army’s strategic leaders are determined by the established laws of the United States. The second element of culture is respect for the right and dignity of other people. The different operations conducted by the Army should consider the rights and dignity of others and the Army should not be seen to be infringing on these rights. Even in enemy territory, the target is always the adversary and the Army always tries as much as possible not to expose innocent civilians of the enemy territory to danger. The Soldiers are always trained to protect the political independence of the collective American society. This is to mean that the nation has a right of holding political opinions within the geopolitical world and no citizen of the nation should be exposed to threats due to the political stands of the nation. The other element of Army culture is that evaluations are always performed before the Soldiers are released to engage in war. All these values help in collective and individual development of Soldiers (U.S. Army,

An as steward of the Nation, it is our responsibility to be vigilance and protect our freedom and democracy from all enemies, foreign and domestic. As Army Professional we must the serve the American people to earn their trust. Trust is the foundation that bonds the Army relationship with the American people, it reflects confidence and faith. The peoples’ trust in Army provides the United States the ability

Providing expert customer service, building trust, and enhancing tactical and technical knowledge are just a few qualities expected when considering Profession of Arms. Through numerous deployments by my peers and I have shown that determination, training, and embodying the army standards are essential qualities every junior NCO needs to possess to accomplish the mission successfully. Chaos and continuous conflict have transformed the Army into a complex network of missions overseas with little to no room for error. Soldiers have done an outstanding job of accomplishing their duties and portraying the Army in a positive light. However, this doesn’t make the Army a profession as stated in the article, “Our client, the American people, gets to make that judgment of the extent to which we are a profession and they will do so based on the bond of trust we create with them based on the

This duty is sometimes the hardest and most challenging responsibility that can be given to any Professional soldier, they are entrusted with the burden of lawfully taking another human life when necessary. Soldiers have situational awareness, and know how to do their job efficiently being a cornerstone of a true profession. Maintaining self-control and being accountable for actions is the mark of a Soldier with good military bearing. The technology in our military has greatly increased in strength, the U.S. has the best technology in the world and with technology increasing Soldiers specialized knowledge and skills improve through prolonged education and experience.

Of the six chapters in Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 1, chapter 5 is the most important with respect to the duty positions and responsibilities of a Captain in the United States Army. The Army Profession - chapter 5, titled Military Expertise – Our Application of Landpower, defines military expertise, outlines the three steps necessary to develop and maintain military expertise, and finally describes dominance in the land domain as what Soldiers actually do in order to execute the Army’s mission: “to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders.” (HQ,

Within the Adjacent Corps we must strive to be proficient. Tactical and technical proficient we must operate as a team. While raising to the challenges placed in front of us. Along with assisting any civilian counterparts and Soldiers alike. We all need to follow a set of ethical standards. We are all professional at every grade and rank. Our MOS doesn’t limit us to our comrades it defines and what we are capable of despite rank. The Army must never cease to push itself to be the best while displaying this to Soldiers subordinate and senior. As a Human Resource NCO I feel that we need to show our strength and stay diligent helping our fellow 42A regardless if they are TPU , AGR or AC alike sharing the knowledge that we have learned and absorbed expertise. First to all junior enlisted and senior enlisted because those unwillingness to learn from another 42A is not the way of the Adjacent Corps. Thought it’s hard to balance being a professional we must demonstrate this in day situation because we are professional in uniform and out of the uniform. The Army professional have issues with toxic leadership in Within the Army Professional Culture but the as soldiers and 42A’s staying professional with this environment is critical to

Instilled throughout training is that a soldier has to be able to kill, that that is the soldier’s purpose, and this is regardless of the job in which a particular soldier specializes. Of course, I do not fault the military for this. The military is, after all, the coercive arm of a state entity’s foreign policy, which is a euphemistic way of saying that the military functions for war making when another state entity does something the former does not like. Regardless of any other uses, the raison d’etre of the military is to kill. The statement hardly seems necessary, but the number of people who do not make this connection or downplay this function of the military is remarkable. Once someone comes to these conclusions, this presents a completely new host of questions.