Among the European countries, France has been one of the most influenced by the Catholic Church. During the Ancien Regime, France was considered Catholicism's “Eldest daughter” because France was the first country to take in Catholicism as the nation’s religion. Due to the relationship between the country and religion, the pope and king formed a closely knit connection between each other. As it is written in the book “The French Revolution and the Church,” the idea of the state and church being independent from each other was not considered as a practical possibility to anyone at the time. Another reason why they were closely related was because the kings of the form of government known as absolutism were known to derive their power from God. …show more content…
Although Henry IV was baptized a Catholic, he was raised as a Protestant. To end religious strife however, he chose to convert to Catholicism to end the Wars of Religion and to please the majority of France. In the midst of much hatred between the Catholics and the Huguenots, Henry IV came up with a solution-- the Edict of Nantes. The Edict of Nantes was signed to give the Huguenots some rights in the much Catholic country of France. Some of the rights included, as written in the Edict of Nantes, “to live and dwell in all the Cities and places of this our Kingdom and Countreys under our obedience, without being inquired after, vexed, molested, or compelled to do any thing in Religion, contrary to their Conscience.” Despite his efforts for reconciliation between the Catholics and the Huguenots, he was unaccepted by both and was assassinated by a Catholic in May of 1610. Following Henry IV’s reign was the rule of Louis XIII. Louis XIII worked with Duke de Luynes, both of them strongly supportive of an absolutist government. Raised by his mother, a devout catholic, and without Henry IV who was more sympathetic toward Huguenot views, Louis XIII grew up as a Catholic. He was known for his intolerance towards the Huguenots, not allowing them to rebuild their buildings destroyed from the wars or from having a position in the government. The last king of the seventeenth century was …show more content…
The absolutist monarchy, along with the Catholic Church, was in danger. The commoners had enough of all the privileges the clergy and the nobles had and started to revolt. During the Ancien Regime, France was divided into three different estates, the First, Second, and Third Estate. The First Estate was composed of all the clergy, while the Second was the nobility, and Third, those who were not included in the First or Second. The clergy was the first estate among the three because they were the ones who were closest to God, not including the king because he is not a part of the Estates.Benefits the Catholics and the nobilities were able to have from the government were apparent in the way the Estates were organized. The discrimination against the Third Estate could be seen in ways that, although the third estate constituted over 90 percent of the population, they had the equal amount of votes with the clergy and nobility. That means, because both the clergy and nobility are content with what they have, the third estate would always be outvoted by the two. First of all, the First and Second Estates did not have to pay tax. The burden was completely on the Third estate, and in addition to that, the First estate received tithes from the commoners. The First Estate owned the most land collectively. The First Estate, while being only .5 percent of the population of France, owned around ten percent
2. Henry IV was King of France from 1589 to 1610 and King of Navarre from 1572 to 1610. He was the first monarch of the Bourbon branch of the Capetian dynasty in France. As a Huguenot, Henry was involved in the Wars of Religion before ascending the throne in 1589. Before his coronation as King of France at Chartres, he changed his faith from Calvinism to Catholicism and, in 1598, he enacted the Edict of Nantes, which guaranteed religious liberties to the Protestants, thereby effectively ending the civil war. One of the most popular French kings, both during and after his reign, Henry showed great care for the welfare of his subjects and displayed an unusual religious tolerance for the time. By him granting religious liberties to the Protestants he was helping establishing a modern state in France.
They, like a fox, slyly gained political influence over the church by negotiating with the pope. They were given the ability to choose who would be the Church’s clergy and priests. This is extremely important to the throne, for with this capability, the monarch would be able to control the faith of their nation. Not only would they manage the finances and property of the people, but also the hearts. Another “fox-like” quality of the French monarchs is the astute way in which Edward IV and others conducted foreign policy. They focused on diplomacy when dealing with foreign affairs, which helped them to avoid expensive wars. This saved their nation a large amount of money, because instead of constant fighting, there was continual growth. In a similar manner to England, the French monarchy displayed sneaky characteristics by choosing from among smaller landowners and urban lawyers for a government council. By choosing these landowners and lawyers, the monarch received more financial support and power than they would have by choosing nobles and aristocrats. Along with the “fox-like” actions, France also showed “lion-like” characteristics with Edward, Richard III, and Henry VII who attempted to reinstate prominence, suppress the influence of the nobility, and demonstrate law and discipline a local level around France. By lessening the importance of nobles, the rulers gained control and started to rebuild the position of the monarch. They were fierce in their endeavors to gain power and enforce law in their nation. This, along with the newly established influence on the church and careful efforts to avoid expensive and unnecessary wars, showed how France both had “fox-like” and “lion-like”
Kings in France were said to be chosen by God to represent Him on earth. As argued by Jacques Bossuet “ Monarchical authority comes from God”. It was during the coronation ceremony in 1654 at Reims cathedral that will provide him the power of “god".With this reasoning, Louis XIV grew up wanting to assert his authority over the church and create a unified country under Christianity. As said by J. Orcibal“ Louis was more likely to proclaim himself more Catholic than the pope and to prove this by assuming leadership for a crusade against his own Protestant subject (…)”. He decided in 1685 to revoke the Edict of Nantes, which secure the right of protestant to exercise their faith. Peter the Great was also a religious man, and being inspired by the Western world, he also believed in divine right and on his role of protector of the Orthodox faith. However, one can notice a difference between the theory of absolutism in Russia and France: there was never a mention of limitation of power for the tsar. He used the church as a mean to expand his absolute power. He abolished the Patriarchate (the head of the
Nowadays purchasing firearms can be as easy as going to a gun show and buying a gun from there. Background checks are only required when making a purchase in a store. While this happens it makes
In the late eighteenth to the early nineteenth century, France was undergoing major changes. Before the French Revolution, France was experiencing political, social and economic problems. During this time period France was unstable, and wasn’t able to keep up with the new arising Enlightenment ideas. In addition, there were high taxes, unequal power distribution and social inequality. The French Revolution not only impacted the citizens of France, but people from other countries as well.
France was set up for absolute monarchy by King Henry IV. Henry’s ambitions neutralized the clash between Catholics and Protestants, in the Edict of Nantes. Before Henry’s assassination, he had created a financial surplus in the kingdom. Next in line for the throne was Louis XIII, Henry’s son, but he was too young to rule, so Cardinal Richelieu had control over the kingdom. He limited the political privileges of the Huguenots and involved France in the Thirty Years War, and by doing this he affirmed the royal power and engaged France more in European affairs.
Louis XIV, the ruler of France from the late seventeenth century to the early eighteenth century, claimed, “I am the state.” He considered this to be absolutism. His goal, also acquainted with absolutism, was, “one king, one law, one faith;” Furthermore, Louis wanted to promote religious unity, royal dignity, and security of the state. In order to achieve this goal, he had to rule with a firm hand, laying down the law for all to see. Louis XIV’s absolutism fostered in four major parts: the building of Versailles to control the nobility, the breeding of a strong military, the improvement of France’s economy, and, while quite harsh, the brutal extinction of religious toleration.
The Seventeenth century is the peak of the growth of absolute monarchy in Europe, Louis XIV, King of France, assured that his objective was “one king, one law, and one faith.” Having people believe he was God’s repetition on Earth, and how it was his divine right to rule by the Holy Father. The stepladder Louis XIV takes to achieve and sustain this goal had an immense power in European history.
One major cause of the old regime were the taxes and laws between the three estates. As seen in Document 2, “the 3rd estate paid 50% of income in taxes while the 1st and 2nd paid less than 5%” (Doc 2). This clearly shows that the most populated estate, the third estate, paid half of their income as their taxes. Larger amounts of taxes the third estate paid versus the lower amount of taxes for the first and second estates. Another significant cause was the unequal three estates and the third estate was overpowered. The third estate had more power in laws and taxes and their relationship with the lower estates were not good. As demonstrated in Document 7, the cartoon of the “The political and social system in France” (Doc 7). This cartoon proves the relationship between the third estate and the two lower estates. The lower estates didn’t have anything to do with taxes and laws and the third estates were all in laws and taxes. The final
King Louis XIV distrusted the Protestants and everything they stood for. Because of that, he revoked the Edict of Nantes and
The Catholic monarchy and the Protestant group, the Huguenots, could not see eye to eye on how France should be run or what religion should be in control. During this time in history, people believed only one type of religious expression was allowed in a country. The Reformation gave the possibility for people to follow their own beliefs in religion, rather than follow the one religion of the country. “In a society in which the church served as the central institution in people’s lives, this radical new idea struck at the very foundation of European politics and social realities” (Sherman & Salisbury, 2011, p. 88). The French War of Religions was a result of this new thinking.
There are very few members in the first and second estates, yet they owned the most land, while the third estate made up most of the population, yet owned very little land. “First: Clergy - 1% of the people owned 10% of the land. Second Estate: Nobles - 2% of the people owned 35% of the land. Third Estate - Middle class, peasants, city workers 97% of the people owned 55% of the land.” (Document 2) There were high prices, high taxes, and people were listening to enlightenment ideas. Louis XVI decided to tax the Second Estate. They called a meeting of the Estates-General - an assembly of representatives from all three estates. (ROI) In addition, as a political cause, the third estate had no privileges or say in the government,while both the clergy and nobles did. As mentioned before, the inequality of taxes proved another gap in the social classes. “The Revolution had been accomplished in the minds of men long before it was translated into fact.... The middle class...was sensitive to their inferior legal position. The Revolution came from them-the middle class. The working classes were incapable of starting or controlling the Revolution. They were just beginning to learn to read.” (Document 4) Estates- General was the first such meeting in 175 years. Met on May 5th,1789 in Versailles. In the Estate- General each estate had one vote. (ROI)
Henry IV of France was able to act as a "fox" by evaluating what mattered more to him. When Henry converted to Catholosism out of being a Hugenot during the Saint Bartholomew 's Day Massacre, it was clear that he valued his own life over religion. Even when he coverted back to Calvinism afterwards, he soon relized his valued of being in power over religion would cause him to convert, once again, back into Catholism. “Paris is worth a Mass," he said as he gave into the Roman Catholic Church for the leadership of France. This value of state over religion made him a politique, believing that no religious truth was worth the ravages of cicil war. He kept France from futher civil war by issuing the Edict of Nantes which acknowledged Catholicism as th official religion of France but guaranteed the Hugenots the rights to worship. He was wise to recognize that tolerance can help establish peace in his nation and also to convert to Cathalosism because of their bigger population in France.
This meant that they were heavily taxed like the rest of the Third Estate, but many avaided taxes. Some of the bourgeois were envious of the nobility and had resentment towards the First and Second Estates, many against the Ancien Regime and well educated a large proportion of the bourgeois knew of the discoveries happening during the Age of Enlightenment. The Ancien Regime prioritised the people of France in order of Estates, with the King being above all, as a result of the system keeping 97% of the population in one category the system did not satisfy many of the bourgeois of the time resulting in them supporting the revolution.
The church and the state had to contend with the growing influence of the Enlightenment and the need to strike a new balance with religion, a more utilitarian balance determined in large part by its own political rationalism. Power was held within the monarchy and the church. The monarchy of France and the Catholic Church were allies that were unbreakable. The King was the master of the temporal realm, while the Church under his protection ruled the spiritual realm. Kings derived their authority from God and stood immediately below him in rank. The monarchy had the support of the church and the church had the support of the monarchy. Power was based on morality and the church thrived on positive morality and the monarchy was proof of this morality. The balance between these two powers in France was equivalent to one another. The whole system