cases, co-marketing is not enough to enter a foreign market. This is why expansion in joint ventures are more successful than co-marketing agreement.
A successful joint venture must increase the value of its individual partners. Additionally, if the joint venture is highly reliant on one of the partners and mostly building value in that partner, there is going to be an opportunity for the others to connect their equity in the joint venture that is the key partner of the venture. This kind of events cannot take place in co-marketing so it makes joint venture beneficial for all partners that are tied to the joint venture.
There are also disadvantages of joint ventures against co-marketing
One of the key characteristics of the joint venture is
…show more content…
For Heart, the ‘digestibility ‘of the targeted assets, itself a function of the size and organizational structure of the firm that owns them, is the crucial determinant of the choice between joint ventures and acquisitions (Hennart S. , 1997). Digestibility is also a determinant of the choice that is made when firms are not sure whether to choose joint ventures or acquisitions. while Balakrishnan and Koza are concerned with transaction costs in the market for firms, Heart's focus is on the costs of integrating the target firm’s labor force (what has been called the post-acquisition integration problem). (Hennart S. , 1997)The understanding of the choice between joint venture and acquisition allows us to understand how the logical decision can be made.
There are 4 types of exact reasons why to choose joint ventures over acquisitions, invisibilities, management costs, difficulties in assessing the value of the target firm and governmental and institutional barriers according to Hebbart and
This allows them to capitalise on the core competencies of other firms, resulting in competitive advantage if successful. The major benefits of strategic alliances rather than acting independently include a new source of revenue, a vehicle for firm growth, faster responses to market opportunities, technological changes and global conditions, and grants experiences to draw new knowledge from.
Mergers and acquisitions include obtaining, offering, parcelling, and becoming a member of exceptional associations with tantamount accessories that may intensify their total benefits. The key wish of mergers and acquisitions is to make sure that various associations can improvement inside of their precise venture. They can do that without making an assistant, joint meander, or a baby aspect. A getting is a company motion where an association purchases yet another organization or business factor. It is notably a traditional that the acquirement is the time when a larger firm purchases a smaller organization. The higher organization will constantly obtain the organization strength of the tinier organization and preserve the name of the maintained association.
According to the researchers the increased value results from an opportunity to utilize a specialized resources which arises solely as a result of the merger (Jensens & Ruback, 1983; Bradle, Desai and Kim , 1983). For creating operational and financial synergies managers believe that two enterprises will be worth more if merged than if operates as two separate entities. Thus, the two companies, A and B:
Partnering and strategic alliances involves working together for the mutual benefit of not only each other, but for the organization (Goetsch & Davis, 2016, p. 64). There are many benefits to partnering. Partnering continually improves processes and products as well as relationships between the organization and its suppliers (Goetsch & Davis, 2016, p. 65). It also improves overall satisfaction of the customers (Goetsch & Davis, 2016, p. 65). Partnering is not limited to those who the organization deals with outside the company. Internal partnering is just as important (Goetsch & Davis, 2016, p. 68). Partnering and forming strategic alliances both within the company an outside the company creates a competitive advantage over other organizations and more opportunities by opening up new markets and increasing the skills and capabilities of the employees within the organization (Goetsch & Davis, 2016, p. 65).
The foreign partner can also become a competitor by selling its production in places where the parental company is already in.
It serves as a reference to co-researchers who will conduct research with relation to the topics in the study.
The goals of mergers range from reducing the number of competitors, to access of new products (Belcourt et al., p 330). Statistics show that 80% of new product developments fail (Howells, 2011), partly due to challenges and conflicts with human resources functions. Mergers and acquisitions are the fastest way to enter new markets. “It is estimated that 1/3 of all mergers fail due to faulty integration of diverse operations and cultures,” (Chhinzer, 2013). Therefore, the success of a merger or acquisition lies in the ability to guide, motivate, retain, and effectively use
Joint venture can help Saudi Group in diversifying its business activities. Milton R. Stewart; Ryan D. Maughn (2011) pointed out “Efficient and cost effective ways to enter foreign markets that allow companies to share risks and exploit synergies with partner companies continue to drive businesses toward international joint ventures, it can provide access to unique business opportunities and new geographic markets that may not otherwise be available, especially to smaller and medium sized businesses”. Business diversification can avoid Saudi Group depends on profit contribution from local business activities only, profit from international entry can help in expanding the local business activities. Joint venture is able to resolve both long and short-term problem and effectively deal with the weaknesses and thread of Saudi
Again in everything there are pros and cons. The pros to a partnership is that obtaining a partner is easy, when there is more than one owner this increases financial stability allowing each partner to contribute funds and potentially increase their borrowing capacity. Depending on the business and its need for additional partners this could increase employee retention because employees will see an opportunity to one day be a partner.
Strategic alliance “combine key resources, cost, risk, technology and people” (Williams, 2010). One of the common denominators of strategic alliance is having a joint venture. This is “when two existing companies collaborate to form a third company. The two founding companies remain intact and unchanged except that together they now own the newly created joint venture” (Williams, 2010). Having a joint venture there are many benefits and risk with global marketing. “For a global model to work, global teams need to develop an understanding of local markets and establish a close relationship with local marketing teams” (Griffith, 2012). There are recommendations that should be followed in order to complete strategic planning and commit to the company perspective and
Haspeslagh and Jemison (1987), argue that what determines the success of a acquisition is not the actual purchase itself, but the development of the acquisition strategy the supports. Unfortunately, many executives face the acquisitions as an end, not a means to achieve that end. According to this author, the acquisition is only one strategy business growth. There are others as internal growth, joint venture, partnership, franchise and strategic alliance. All should be evaluated by the company before implementing a business development strategy. A proper analysis of the acquisition goes beyond the study's own candidate company. It must include a contribution from the analysis of potential acquisition for the strategic development, as well as
A joint venture is characterised by the need to achieve a business transaction while remaining separate from each other. Each firm maintains its resources and independence while engaging in an activity, with the objective of achieving certain objectives. The need for joint ventures in the Pharmaceutical industry may be characterised by the need to reduce high R&D costs and by so doing, share costs through common equity (Roijakkers&Hagedoon,2005, p.8). Joint venture as a mode of market entry may
The lesson learned from this is that sometimes it is easier and faster reach a new market via joint venture, even though the profit will be less, but the company can save a lot of money in studying the new market trying to understand the new culture and how they purchase and also it can minimize the risk because there is a national brand supporting the new international brand, which gives confidence and security to the customers.
It is because through the joint venture, the company is more familiar with the situation of the company there. The negative outcome is that the management system different between the company. So it is hard to make a decision making. It is because there is different opinion of each person.
Joint ventures have further benefits. Joint ventures are based on sharing individual ability and resources for the purpose of achieving a mutually beneficial objective. Sony gains access to Ericsson’s market share and their network of infrastructure and handset technology. Ericsson can acquire Sony's experience on consumer electronics, fashionable designs and production processes. Hence, the joint venture overcomes Sony's low market share and strengthens Ericsson's ability of research and product development. Thus joint ventures resolve the opportunism issue with OEM, licensing and franchising.