Theoretical framework This dissertation seeks to provide an answer as to how various funding models may influence the decision-making process of a new business owner and thus provide the answer as to which one of them is suitable for founders of cafés and restaurants. Therefore, it is based on a theoretical framework comprising multiple concepts such as decision-making, voting rights and the concept of risk. The aspects of each funding model need to be assessed, with a particular focus on perceived or actual voting rights, general personal involvement of third parties in business decisions, risks and advantages and disadvantages. Decision-making According to the Business Dictionary, decision-making is “the thought process of selecting a logical …show more content…
One of them is determining whether the business owner will be the sole decider on behalf of his new business. Individual decision-making, as anything else in life, has its advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of individual decision-making include saving time and sometimes money – assembling multiple people and discussing the topic of each decision can take much more time than simply deciding on your own (Individual Decision Making - Pros and Cons, n.d.). Individually made decisions also do not only tend to be more logical and rational, the individuals who make them can also be held accountable for them, which can be a difficult thing to achieve in a group where a decision is made and supported by multiple individuals, while some others may not agree (Individual Decision Making - Pros and Cons, …show more content…
With multiple people working on a decision, the group has the potential to gather more valuable information required to make the decision at hand, which may take too much time for an individual (Individual Decision Making - Pros and Cons, n.d.). Moreover, an individual may be more likely to be biased by his own personal tendencies and his intuition – this risk is much smaller when multiple decision-makers are involved (Individual Decision Making - Pros and Cons,
The challenge when working with others to make a decision is that we all have our own methods of coming to a conclusion. The rational decision-making model is comprehensive in the fact that it requires the decision maker to define the problem, identify criteria for making the decision, weight the criteria, develop alternatives, evaluate alternatives and finally select the best alternative (Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A. 2009). The challenge with utilizing this method is the fact that most of the time in real world situations, facts are either limited or missed, time compression causes an oversight on all potential alternatives and people tend to choose the easier route to make decisions (Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., 2009). Intuition is a powerful tool, however it can also lead to quick and potentially bad decisions (Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., 2009). I can recall a conversation with a leader about an employee that made an error administering a medication. The manager had not spoken with the employee or
People should make decisions every day, some of those decisions are easy to make, while others are quite difficult to implement. An appropriately combined and organized decision-making process will help to control this issue and bring a positive outcome for those involved. The decision-making process may become challenging for people due to “the lack of structure and entail risk, uncertainly and conflict” (Bateman and Snell, 2012, p. 86). That is why people trying to make important personal or professional decisions should have an appropriate model to follow in order to avoid these challenges. Bateman and Snell identified six steps or stages of decision-making process
Often, when people have to make an important decision, they ask others for advice. Doing this can be incredibly efficient and useful, but it also has its downsides. I personally think that asking multiple other people for advice is a good idea, because the decision-maker can never be sure if one person’s advice is good or not. Seeking multiple opinions can help someone make a better choice because they’ll know who to go to in the future for advice, they’ll be able to ensure the information is valid, and they’ll know which suggestion is the best.
Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran developed the Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making theory to “offer practical advice on how participants can act to ensure better group decisions” (Hirokawa, 1999, p. 170). They believe that as long as the members in a group care about the issue and are reasonably intelligent, the group interaction will have a positive effect on the final decision. In order for a group to reach a high-quality solution, Hirokawa and Gouran believe the group 's decision-making process needs to fulfill four task requirements they refer to as requisite functions of effective decision making. "Three core assumptions define the functional perspective: (1) groups are goal oriented; (2) group performance varies in quality and quantity, and can be evaluated; and (3) internal and external factors influence group performance via the interaction process.” (Wittenbaum, 2004 p. 19).
Most decisions are made with analysis, but some are judgment calls not susceptible to analysis due to time or information constraints. Please write about a judgment call you’ve made recently that couldn’t be analyzed. It can be a big or small one, but should focus on a business issue. What was the situation, the alternatives you considered and evaluated, and your decision making process? Be sure to explain why you chose the alternative you did relative to others considered.
Every action a person takes is the result of having thought about what it is they think they should do and then doing it. Life is riddled with problems that require solving. Decisions are complex matters that require careful judgment and problem analysis especially when one is in a role where others look up to them and are affected by their decisions.
Firstly, it is obvious that we are faced with decisions every day ranging from trivial to vastly important. There are different factors that can affect all of the choices people make. Some of these factors are past experience, individual differences, and the situation. The most critical of these is the situation, although it is commonly overlooked. Usually people will attribute personal
* Sample: The sample is limited to a small proportion of working professionals in Western Sydney and may not accurately reflect the population of working professionals.
A decision is “a conscious choice of an alternative from a set of several others”. A person has the option to choose from different alternatives when making a decision. After a person makes a decision, he/she needs to evaluate it, analyses it and sees the outcomes. There are two types of decision making process; first, no-programmed decision making that refers to things a person has not done before, such as buying a car or a house. The second decision making process is programmed that involves things that we do on a daily basis such as eating or showering. In addition, group decision making involves brainstorming which is a way of collecting different ideas in order to take the best alternative to make a decision; then, consensus is
Specifically, one of the first decisions that Ms. Growne should make, is whether she wants to acquire the assets of the tavern or the stock/interests in the business
Though this is an effective way to make decisions, like all ways of deciding things, it is key that the ones deciding are playing their role. If they are not, it can cause great negative
The rational decision-making model describes a series of steps that decision makers should consider if their goal is to maximize the quality of their outcome. In other words, if you want to make sure that you make the best choice, going through the formal steps of the rational decision-making model may make sense. The following are the steps taken to come to a rational decision: 1. Identify the problem, 2. Establish decision criteria, 3. Weigh decision criteria, 4. Generate alternatives, 5. Evaluate the alternative, 6. Choose the best alternative, 7. Implement the decision, 8. Evaluate the decision.
As stated by Prasad (2008), the managers should identify the different choices available in order to get most acceptable outcome of a decision. From searching different alternatives the managers can evade blocks in operations as choices are suitable if a particular idea goes wrong. Khanka (2000) expresses the view that selections can developed from in many ways such as can get from sources like experience, do training other organizations, and take others ideas and suggestions related in problems. Furthermore to improve alternatives solution the managers may investigation the signs of a problem for clues or fall back on intuition or result that stated by Griffin and Moorhead (2010). For an example in marketing department a non-programmed decision is compulsory the manager have to produce alternatives for raise market share. As McShane and Von Glinow (2000) pointed out that in a programmed decision is a standard operations is not to generate choice but can take out from the documented that already saved. Next an organizer should search the mission of a decision. In other words they need to define what is to be accomplished by it (Quick & Nelson, 2013). The decision criteria are important as mentioned by Dubrin (2002). The several criteria are consumers must aware of varies in quality of products, there not happen inflation, workers must consider the quality of improvements and lastly job satisfaction should not be reduce.
Decision making can be described as a process of making a decision or decisions, based on choices made amongst two or more competing course of actions. The ‘Decision making’ also requires making a define choice between two or more alternatives course of actions that are available.
Decision-making is very vital in the study of administration. Decision-making is the act of deciding the best choice or alternative that brings success or advantage to a situation that will ensure maximum benefits and least risk. Probability can be applied to decision-making in public administration because it is possible to estimate the probability of occurrence of specific events. A part of decision-making in relationship to public administration has to do with goals. The probability of you meeting those goals depends on decision-making. For example a restaurant owner has received more revenue on Thursdays than on any other day And less Revenue on Saturdays than any other day. The owner has looked at everything that could have influenced his sales. The owner realized that the only things that were different on Thursdays than any other day was the chief special and the drink special. According to the receipts of the last four Thursdays the probability that a customer orders a drink special is 60%. The probability that a customer orders the chief special is 50%. The probability of them ordering both is 42%. This shows the restaurant owner that Thursdays drink special should be considered on both Thursdays and Saturdays.