The integrated physician model plays a key role in healthcare. This paper will explore what the integrated physician model is, as well as why clinical integration is important in the strategic planning process. Accountable care organizations will be assessed based on their dynamics and controversies. Finally, an in-depth look at one of the integrated physician models (the hospitalist model) will be assessed for its advantages and disadvantages. Over the course of a few years, hospitals and physicians will form a series of partnerships (Harrison, 2016). The series of partnerships is known as an integrated physician model. The integrated physician model is important in healthcare because it allows the organization that is following it to …show more content…
These accountable care organizations work to make sure the patient gets the correct care and help to avoid duplications in services and medical errors. Accountable care organizations can allow organizations to profit from the Medicare Shared Savings Program. Accountable care organizations serve as a type of encouragement for doctors, other healthcare workers, and hospitals to work together to provide the best care (Harrison, 2016). While there are several dynamics to accountable care organizations, there are also controversies. Accountable care organizations allow patients to see any Medicare provider that are in or out of the network, instead of requiring a particular set of providers (Harrison, 2016). Furthermore, patients become assigned to an organization due to where they received most of their primary care at. Providers may have to deal with added financial risks because of the patients being assigned based on most of their primary care. Depending on the accountable care organization, administrative costs have the potential to add millions to expenses. It is now time to look more closely at one of the models for hospital-physician’s integration, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that go along for the hospitals and physicians. The hospitalist model involves a patient’s outpatient physician to transfer full responsibility of care to a dedicated inpatient physician if the patient is to be hospitalized, who would be responsible for inpatient care
“An Integrated Physician Model is the result of a series of partnership between hospitals and physician develop overtime” (Harrison, 2016). Primarily, it is a joint venture that has become many joint ventures. In addition, all of this joint ventures are connected through congruent goals, and that is to provide different level of care to all the patients. Integrated physician model also organizing themselves to improve the cost and quality by operating under a clinical guideline. This could include acute care hospital, home care, nursing homes, affiliated medical group, primary care clinics, employed physician and any independent medical groups.
The Accountable Care Organization (ACOs) is in an integration of doctors, hospitals and other health care providers to deliver efficient care. The purpose is to ensure that patients get the best health care treatment and prevent any medical errors. Public and private payers are part of the accountable care organizations for people that use Medicare or non-Medicare users. The essential components of ACOs are to reduce cost and share savings, remove existing barriers to improve the value of care, and have a payment system that rewards the volume and intensity of provided services. Furthermore, ACOs goals are to develop legal agreements between hospitals and other providers
Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are consist of providers who are jointly held accountable for achieving measured quality improvements and reductions in the rate of spending growth.
The concept of an Affordable accountable cCare oOrganization (ACO) is still evolving. Generally, an ACO is a group of health care providers (including primary care physicians, specialists, and medical facilities) that work in partnership and are collectively accountable for the cost and quality of health care they deliver to a specific population of patients. At the heart of each patient's care is a primary care physician.
Preferred provider organizations offer flexibility in benefit design and allow patients flexibility to choose from a list of in-network providers for their care. Care provided in-network typically is discounted with out of network services resulting in higher out of pocket expenses to the patient (Hirth, Grazier, Chernew and Okeke, 2007). Clinically integrated networks are a more recently developed managed care structure. In this model, independent practitioners form a virtual network as a means of increasing capacity for contracting with payers of healthcare whether commercial insurance or for self-insured organizations. Physicians recognize advantages to collaborative contracting and the increase in coordinating care of patients through the network (Kaplan and Guest, 2012). Commercial insurance companies are looking to clinically integrated networks as another mechanism to control the costs of healthcare delivery. Accountable care organizations, as with clinically integrated networks, are fairly recent phenomenon with similar but more formalized characteristics. An accountable care organization is a structured network of healthcare entities which have united and are responsible for the health of an identified population. The accountable care organization shares the risk of meeting the health needs of
This paper will discuss what the Accountable Care Organization is, why did Congress include it in their law, benefits and challenges for physicians and patients, and how does the ACO work for patients. We will also identify the quantitative methods in the ACO and reflect on the information provided.
Integrated Managed Care Organization- The organization is properly aligned for the primary driver being cost cutting services. Since all entities within the organization are responsible and affected by any expenses endured on any entity being unfavorable or favorable, the foundation serves as a primary motivator to reduce costs at all levels. This alignment eliminates any financial gains from driving high utilization of services or higher intensity services within the organization. Ultimately, this system allows the physician medical group to drive care, being responsible for the clinical care decisions as opposed to health plan making those decisions as designed in other organizations. This is the preferable model for Medicaid systems as
Kaiser Health News recently published an article on a new trend in healthcare. This trend introduces the Accountable Care Organization (ACO). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services defines it as “groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their Medicare patients” (“Accountable Care Organization,” 2015). According to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the goal of the ACO is to be able to share health cost-savings with providers who are able to save money by eliminating unnecessary procedures and reduce health costs while increasing quality of care. ACOs make health professionals become more accountable in maintaining good-quality, coordinated healthcare for a patient through a value-based system that is evaluated through a number of criteria and benchmarks (Ronai, 2011).
The health restructuring dispute has centered on compensating providers particularly more when delivering quality care to their patients than for enhancing the volume of services they provide (Ries, 2014) Accountable care organizations (ACOs) is a single proposed way of altering compensation methods to accomplish this objective by generating encouragement to enhance care coordination and clinical integration (Thygeson, Frosch, and Carman, 2014).
The American health care system has been victim to an escalation in the prices of health care services juxtaposed with inefficiency in delivery of care services. There has even been cases where State spending on the actual health care increased dramatically in the United States and one of the key components of curbing this problem which has been prevalent over the mass media and has been a major discussion among physicians is the advent of Accountable Care Organizations. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is structured with the goal of trying to improve health care delivery and aid in the reduction of the overall cost of services (Weissert & Weissert, 2012). If there is insufficient coordination of high quality care delivery in the health care industry, this will have a negative impact on patient safety and diminish affordable care for patients. Hence, the development of ACOs is envisioned to be the savior of medical practices and can improve the overall fabric of the American society (Bresnick, 2013). ACOs serves as one of the answers for curbing the problem of high costs, low quality care and possible segmented delivery and as much as it serve as the major determinant for improvement in patient satisfaction, there are minor
Pioneering an Accountable Care Organization Model which is a program which goes hand in hand with the Medicaid Shared Savings Program. They are focused on providing highly coordinated care for Medicare fee-for-service-beneficiaries.
There has been discussion to have universal healthcare system similar to Medicare as a method to have a centralized monitoring system of cost. There have also been other systems tried beginning with HMOs in the 1970s in an effort to streamline access to necessary healthcare services by employing a gatekeeper to their access at the primary care levels. With patient dissatisfaction, PPOs were tried which circumvent the necessity of referrals (Hacker, 1998). Either of these models had substantial effect on healthcare outcomes while the cost of healthcare continued to skyrocket. The US spends more than any other country on healthcare but outcomes are not better (Blackstone, 2016). In 2010, under President Obama’s leadership, Affordable Care Act was passed and one of the promising features is the formation of accountable care
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislated in 2010, has changed the United States health care industry. In addition to universal healthcare, one of the principles of the ACA is the ideal of accountable care. Specifically, adopting an Accountable Care organization (ACO) for Medicare beneficiaries under the fee for service program. An ACO seeks to hold providers and health organizations accountable for not only the quality of health care they provide to a population, but also keeping the cost of care down (1). This is accomplished by offering financial incentives to the healthcare providers that cooperate in, circumventing avoidable tests and procedures. The ACO model, seeks to remove present obstacles to refining the value of care, including a payment system that rewards the volume and intensity of provided services instead of quality and cost performance and commonly held assumptions that more medical care is equivalent to higher quality care (2) .A successful ACO model, will have developed quality clinical work and continual improvement while effectively managing costs, however this is contingent upon its ability to encourage hospitals, physicians, post-acute care facilities, and other providers involved to form connections that aid in coordination of care delivery throughout different settings and groups, and evaluate data on costs and outcomes(3). This establishes the ACO will need to have organizational aptitude to institute an administrative body to manage patient care,
As you are well aware of, how patient care is delivered is ever-changing in the healthcare world in which we live in. Since the passing of the Affordable Care Act or “Obamacare” in March of 2010 the world of healthcare that we know has drastically changed. In 2011 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) developed new rules under “Obamacare”, aimed at helping doctors, hospitals and other provider’s better coordinate care by implementing Accountable Care Organizations, or ACOs Leavitt Partners has been actively tracking ACOs since 2010 and the number of current ACO’s in the United States as of January 2015 is 744. According to the Leavitt Partners survey, over 23.5 million people are being covered under one of the ACO models (Health Affairs Blog, 2015). According to these statistics and growing number of hospitals participating in ACOs, where is does your hospitals potential financial performance stand if it were to become part of an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)?
Given huge potentials and resources, the healthcare system in the United States stands among the best in the world; however, it has been constantly plagued with issues of cost, access, quality and distribution.1 The national health expenditure levels on per capita basis as well as the percentage of GDP has for several years remained higher than other OECD countries but has in contrast, been ranked low on significant health indicators.1,2 As part of the ongoing healthcare reform efforts, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010 which led to outright and possible immense changes in healthcare.1 Accountable Care organizations (ACOs) were presented as the healthcare delivery system signature of the ACA, as a novel Medicare payment model.3