Aggression And Sports Research Paper

Violence in sport has become far too commonplace. Aggressive sports such as football and hockey involve many aggressive tactics; however far too often do these aggressive tactics become overshadowed by deliberate acts of violence with the intent to cause bodily harm to an opponent. Many professional and non-profession athletes, as well as coaches, have adapted the mentality that winning is the common goal that all who participate in sport strive for and therefore feel that engaging in violent acts while competing should be permitted in achieving this goal. In sport winning is what each athlete strives for and seemingly they will consign in harmful acts of violence to achieve their goal. Former Boston Bruins player David Forbes was quoted “

In order to eradicative any negative connotations associated with sports, should all violent aspects of

To understand what the public believes on violence in sports, a survey was conducted among American youths ages 13 to 17 in October of 2000. The Gallup Youth Survey showed that 63 percent of teens said there was too much violence in hockey. In comparison, 41 percent said football was too violent, 25 percent said basketball was too violent, and 17 percent said baseball was too violent. One question that remains though is how does one qualify violence. A study completed in December 2000 by the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Research tried to do just that. According to the test analysis, 1.69 "acts of aggression" occurred in hockey for every aggressive act in basketball, the only other sport in the study (Grant).

When Indiana Pacer, Ron Artest, charged into the stands with forty-five seconds remaining in a NBA game, last November, between the Pacers and the Detroit Pistons, the shock waves reverberated immediately. Video clips showed Artest pummeling Pistons fans with his fists. Replays also revealed that it was fans, throwing a cup of beer at Artest, which sent the NBA superstar on his rampage. It was one of the ugliest incidents ever seen in American professional sports. Sports fans and non-sports fans alike witnessed the chaotic outbreak of violence from the serenity of their own living rooms. NBA junkies saw the scene unfold during the game's live broadcast on cable TV. Sports fans caught highlights of the melee on ESPN's

Violence, fistfights specifically, in hockey are viewed as deviant because; that very type of violence is statistically rare in institutionalized sports and it is harmful to individuals, the sport of hockey, and society as a whole. This violence also violates the norms that society has created for competitive sport. Because of these harms, the rarity of such violence in sports, and the violation of the norms, a negative societal reaction forms.

We can pretend that sports are not the main source of entertainment in today’s society. Whether we are athletes playing the sport, avid fans watching our teams and their statistics, or the coaches, it is our character to always be in tuned to what is going on in the competitive sports world. Now, our competitive nature can either give us an edge in life or, in opposition, can cause us to burn bridges. To elaborate, being competitive shows determination, hard work, and is a form of utilizing our gifted talents, resulting in positive outcomes; this is referring to anything in life, not just athletics. On the other hand, being competitive to the point that we are losing teammates, friends, and those close to us shows poor sportsmanship and can have a negative effect on character.

Sports and violence have always sustained a love-hate relationship. We are always trying to find the right balance between safety and aggression. Similar is the case of violence in NHL. Some insist that violence has no place in the game and should be completely eliminated, while others maintain that violence has always been an integral part of the game and is necessary for its success. Aaron Wherry in his article “Violently Happy: Why the NHL Needs to Make Hockey Safe Again for Those Who Appreciate Blood Shed (2007) and Laura Robinson in her article argue that fights in NHL are acceptable as long as it does not hurts anybody. Laura Robinson also argues that hockey Violence leads to Real-life violence. I believe the same and support the argument that violence is essential for the success of NHL.

Popularity of sporting athletes is judged by who is sponsoring them, what team they play for and how they act on and off the field. Violence in sport can be traced back throughout history, (Australian Government, 2009) but recently parents are becoming apposed to certain Australian sports, this is because of the violence of the athletes shown by the media. NRL is amongst the sports that are having a large withdrawal of younger players because of the reports of violence coming from captains and athletes of the sport towards other athletes, the reports of assault towards girlfriends and other family members of the athletes. (The Guardian, 2015) Parents are afraid that their young children looking up to these athletes will lead their children to believe that behavior like this is ok, when its not. The large amount of violence that is coming from the NRL is putting a bad spin on Australia’s football identity. Many Australian’s are concerned that these negative actions are making people in other nations think that Australia condones violence in Australia’s sport. (Australian Government,

There are many instances where sport can tear individuals and communities apart although. This can be evident through derogatory remarks and discrimination, which can turn over into disruption and violence in the stands. The major problem for

Sport and aggressive behavior, Do sports create aggressive behavior, or simply attract people who are already aggressive? Aggression and sport have gone together as long as sports have been around, be it the players themselves, to the parents, coaches, or spectators, they just seem to be an inseparable part of each other. The term violence is defined as physical assault based on total disregard for the well being of self and others, or the intent to injure another person (2. Coakley). Intimidation usually does not cause physical harm, but often is designed to produce psychological consequences, enabling one person to physically over power or dominate another. These statements as defined by the author, Jay J.

Working in the college setting, during both undergrad and grad school, I can attest to the fact that substance abuse is a major issue within athletics. The “winning at all costs” mentality in today’s sports culture directly correlates with the ever-increasing rate of substance abuse amongst athletes. Conversely, substance abuse does not only affect the individual who is misusing the drug, it too affects the individual’s family, friends, and other loved ones. This week’s discussion in combination with the supplemental articles provide us with tremendous insight on the role that we as athletic trainers will have in deterring these addictive behaviors. But how can we take this pertinent information and allow it to guide our decisions in the near

Sport resembles war. In fact, sport was originally built on the premise of preparing soldiers for battle in ancient times. Violence was very prevalent in Ancient Rome and has since deceased because of the emergence of modern sport (Jovašević & Batrićević, 2013). Violence in sport today is not just committed by the athletes, but by coaches and spectators (Corbett et al., 2008). Although violence has been involved in sport for quite some time, the question still remains is violence ethical? Cashmore (as cited in, Wagg et at, 2014) believes that sportsmen and women have no reason to participate in sport for extrinsic money or rewards. Because of modern sports development economics now plays a bigger role and has the potential to harm the ethos

First, an adequate description of the subject’s behavior and actions are needed to determine an appropriate response to the situation. Is the subject resisting? Is the resistance passive or active? Is the subject aggressive? Is there any attempt to comply? All of these questions would have to be interpreted in person to gauge how best to respond.

Research tells that sexual assault and assault rates among male athletes are higher than nonathletes and that is problematic. There are things about playing sports and being an athlete that might contribute to this such as a need for education. The research should that 54 percent of student-athletes admitted to at least one “sexually coercive act in their lifetimes such as sexual assault (Cara, 2016). Nonathletes however only had 38 percent still admitted the same. These athletes were also more likely to support attitudes toward men and believe myths about rape than the nonathletic. It should you there is a problem with athletes and assault or the number would be even for both groups. Researchers believe that this could be due to

“These people want to hurt you. It’s frightening. You feel like you’re in a cage out there”. Reggie Smith, (Berger, 1990). Spectator violence at sporting events has been recorded throughout history. People who have power over the events, often team owners, indirectly influence the amount of spectator violence by encouraging the factors contributing to violence, in order to benefit themselves. Sale of alcohol, encouraging crowd intensity, creating rivalries, and targeting social groups, are factors affecting the degree of spectator violence and can be proven to be influenced by the owner’s actions. Therefore the blame for spectator violence can be attributed to whoever has power over the sport.