Hardly any other historians have earned a reputation as virtuous as Alexander the Great. In just thirteen years, Alexander was not only discerned as a military genius, but became exceedingly notorious for conquering Persia and known as the King of Macedonia. Many hold him responsible for the unification of Greece and the Hellenistic age; the blending of cultures. After Alexander had extended the control of his empire past the Asia Minor, Egypt, Central Asia and on to Persia, he was competent to effectively manage and incorporate other cultures and people under his rule by disseminating Greek culture, embracing religion with encouragement, and respecting other cultures with gratification to customs. Alexander needed a basis to control his …show more content…
After conquering Persia, he assumed the Persian system of government and enabled Persian governors to conduct business. He pleasingly wore embellishing Persian outfits and was presented with visitors in a tent, just like a Persian king would. This provided a sense of familiarity for the Persians. In addition to the tent, he demanded that visitors greet him in the Persian way. This entailed a visitor kneeling in front of the throne and bending over until his head touched the ground at Alexander’s feet. After this welcoming, Alexander would raise the visitors up, kiss him and refer to him as “kinsman”, following the Persian tradition. . He coaxed his soldiers to do the same, the outcome of this would be children that would acquire a blend of both Greek and Persian culture, customs and tradition. There are many reasons why Alexander chose to encompass the custom so greatly. It could have been that he wanted to gain acceptance and loyalty from his subjects or he could have sincerely respected and enjoyed the different cultures that he was being presented with. Overall, coming to peace with the custom and culture was the final way that Alexander exhibited the diversity between different people and cultures that his empire consisted
Alexander the Great was king of the Macedonians and one of the greatest generals in history. As a student of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, Alexander was embedded with lasting interests in philosophy, politics and warfare. As king, he settled problems by immediate action, making quick decisions and taking great risks. His armies overcame these risks by sheer force and by the ingenious tactics instilled in them by Alexander. He and his armies conquered the Persian Empire, which stretched from the Mediterranean Sea to India and formed much of what was then considered the civilized world. Through his conquests, Alexander helped spread Greek ideas, customs and laws throughout Asia and Egypt and adopted a uniform
included Greek Culture, this also shows how greek culture advanced, which also expanded it in the process. Advancing Greek culture is the other reason Alexander was experienced.
Alexander the Great was the king of Macedonia, conqueror of the Persian Empire, and one of the greatest military geniuses of all times. Even at an early age, Alexander had the promise to become a great leader. Through all his victories and conquests, he has become a great hero and has had a large impact on history. That is why I chose he book Alexander the Great, by J.R. Hamilton for my review. Hamilton does a very good job with the story of Alexander the Great.
Does that not seem to you like betrayal and rejection of his own people? Alexander could never have had it both ways. As the conquerors we will never accept the customs of the conquered. Political move it may have been, but it was the wrong one. At the trial of the royal pages conspiracy, it was stated to Alexander that he abhorred the customs of his own country. Thus it was the king of Persians, not of the Macedonians that they wanted to kill13. Alexander has simply become so far removed from his own people that some do not even see him as their own king. The plot against his life was to pursue him as a deserter in accordance with the conventions of war14. When a sailor rescued Alexander’s crown from the sea and placed it on his own head to keep it dry and out of harm’s way, he was rewarded handsomely for the rescue. When it was pointed out by another to Alexander that the crown had been on another’s head, regardless of the situation he had the same man promptly executed on the belief that it was a bad omen. With the adoption of Persian luxury came outright abuse of power and skewed
Alexander III, known as Alexander the Great, is a name that the majority of people have come across, even thousands of years after his death. He was given the name “Alexander the Great” because of all his contributions in making the Persian empire veer in a completely different direction in such a short amount of time. Great amounts of people believe that he was deserving the that title. I, however, think that he should not have been awarded that title. I believe that he was not deserving of “the great” because he was cruel, his empire didn’t last, and all his actions were very extra and unnecessary.
How does one truly define the term “greatness”? The concept of being great heavily depends on the opinions and thoughts of each individual person. So what may be considered greatness to one, can easily be seen as failure to another. One famous person in history that has seen both sides of this argument is the renowned Alexander the Great. Originally from Macedon, Alexander was assigned the task of invading Persia, after his own father, King Philip II, was assassinated. At the young age of only 20 years old, Alexander began to carry out his father’s wishes by conquering a great deal of lands and gradually becoming the new king of Persia. However, the question remains, do these deeds of his automatically subject Alexander to greatness? For every
Alexander dedicated all of his great victories to the Persians by leading his companion Calvary at weak points in the enemy line. One thing about Alexander is that he was easily identifiable with his magnificent cloak, body armor and helmet. He would always be far out in front of his infantry and he would often became a big focus to enemies and he had ended up getting wounded about a half dozen times due to putting himself on the spot. Later on he had invaded Asia Minor in (334), and after the victories at Granicus (334) and Issus (333), everything west of the Euphrates River was his for the
Alexander could be a very justly ruler, but if you got on his bad side it would not end well for those. Alexander showed mercy to many people after he had conquered their land. An example was after he took over Thebes, he allowed many people to walk away free such as priests, family members of the poet Pindar, and citizens who remained loyal to him. Although he did sell over 20,000 citizens into slavery. I understand why he made this action. He did not want for a rebellion like what happened in Thebes to occur
Alexander III of Macedonia was born in July of 356 B.C.E. on the day of his birth King Philip II, Alexanders father, emerged victorious in a battle with the Illyrian and Paeonia armies, the same day that rumored to be the day the Temple of Artemis in Ephesus burned to the ground. During Alexander’s childhood he was raised in strict and fancy manner that only children of importance participated in. Until the young prince was sixteen he was tutored by the famous philosopher Aristotle. The young prince also learned the ways of battle and would eventually lead to the expansion of Macedonia. Was Alexander the Great solely responsible for the expansion of Macedonia after he received his father’s entire experienced army to take a battle and fight
He became hip to others cultures, even adopting certain dress codes of the peoples. His wife Roxane, was of a different culture. This showed other cultures that he was their friend. He “appointed many Persians as provincial governors in his new empire. He adopted the Persian dress for ceremonies, gave orders for Persians to be enlisted in the army, and encouraged the Macedonians to marry Persian women.”
Alexander the Great crossed the Hellespont with his combined Macedonian and Greek forces and stepped upon the shores of Anatolia. This is the first attack against the Persians on their land. The battle began on May of 334 B.C. ("Battle of the Granicus"). The twenty day march consisted of 32,000 infantry and 5,100 cavalry. This battle was very significant because it is one of the earliest battles on record that was won by cavalry strength and through coronation of infantry support. Although Alexander was close to losing and dying, he managed to win through his battle tactics and massive army. High command governors (satraps) made an army of 10,000 cavalry and 5,000 infantry. They were sent to the town of Zelea in the western part of Asia Minor.
Alexander is also smart with his ways of making deals. When he made his deal with the other Greeks, he told Them that they needed to give him soldiers, ships, and supplies. He was going to get what he wanted, and the Greeks were going to get what they wanted. By gaining people’s trust and having mercy on his enemies, Alexander The Great was continuing to improve his society's PEGS. Political; Alexander ruled with control and kindness.
Meredith, Sam. “North and South Korea Reportedly Set to Announce an Official End to War.”
Alexander the Great is without doubt one of the greatest military leaders of history. Not only did Alexander of Macedon conquer enormous areas of the known world but also he demonstrated dynamic leadership and masterful strategy on a large scale and tactics on the battlefield. During his life, he ruled the largest empire the world had ever seen, which stretched from ancient Greece to India. The son of King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander was educated by the philosopher Aristotle and first led Macedonian troops at age 18. Many times Alexander was worshipped as a god in some of the countries he ruled. He had a huge impact on world history spreading the seeds of western culture and philosophy across the world and has legends and stories
In the second part, "Alexander the Great and Heroic Leadership", he details the life and conquests of Alexander the Great. He was a son of Philip II of Macedon whom Philip II had a great influence on Alexander and his methods as a soldier and commander. Throughout Alexander 's childhood, he was well educated in many areas suitable to a young royal. Alexander 's education included learning to sing and play the lyre, hunt and ride and how to debate, and to appreciate epic poetry, mostly as it related to Homer. On the eve of his march into Asia he was certainly one of the best-informed men in the Greek world. Alexander would become known worldwide for being the leader who did what no other could do before or since conquer states and entities on several continents and create a kingdom greater than any other. He was conquest of the Persian Empire and he marched with his men toward India. He