1. Background and Decision Issues Dow Química Argentina is considering making a bid to Petroquímica Bahia Blanca S.A. (PBB) because it was being privatized by the government of Argentina. PBB, which is located in Bahia Blance, is a major producer of both ethylene and polyethylene in Argentina. Dow sees this as a very big opportunity for the company to expand its market, utilize its resources and invest on a company that will eventually become the leading polyethylene player in Latin America. Dow’s vice president of business development for Latin America, Oscar Vignart, and Luis Marcer, CFO of Dow Química Argentina are building the company’s cash flow projections for this particular project. In so doing, they have to assess the country’s risk; current political and economic conditions of Argentina, exchange rate stabilities, freedom of capital repatriation and the uncertainties of the project so they can justify it to the parent company. They had developed a three-stage operational strategy for their future polyethylene expansion in Argentina. The first stage is the acquisition of the PBB; the second stage is the acquisition of Polisur’s two polyethylene plants and the last stage is building a new ethylene cracker and a polyethylene plant. In order to help them decide, the cash flows from each stage of this big project have been valued using the discounted cash flow approach. They used a discount rate that was adjusted to incorporate the country
In estimating the value of Mercury we can use a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach or a comparable firms’ multiples analysis. In using the DCF approach we have to make some assumptions in our analysis along with using data generated in the industry and in Liedtke’s projections.
Tucker Hansson, the owner of Hansson Private Label, is struggling in whether to execute the $50 million investment proposed by his manufacturing team. Under this situation, the subject of this report is to evaluate the potential investment of expanding production capacity at Hansson Private Label (HBL) and make a recommendation to Tucker Hansson. In this report, I will specifically focus on analyses of the project’s free cash flows (FCFs), weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and net present value (NPV). With a sensitivity analysis, it can help us to observe how change in some key project variables
The relatively well posed project with promises of great future pay offs must be examined closely nevertheless to determine its true profitability. As such, the Super Project’s NPV must be calculated, however before we proceed we must acknowledge the relevant cash flows. The project incurred an expense of testing the market. This expense, however, must not be included in our cash flow analysis because it can be considered a sunk cost. This expense is required for ‘taking a temperature’ of the market and will not be recovered. Other sources of cash flow include:
Pecom, compañía petrolera de Argentina, desde sus inicios fue ganando terreno en la industria del petróleo avanzando a buen ritmo a través del paso de los años. Desde la obtención de su primera concesión, hasta el inicio de operaciones en diversos países sudamericanos, Pecom se fue consolidando como una empresa fuertemente integrada verticalmente.
On June 23, 2008, a Monday morning, Arnaud Martin arrived at his office in Groupe Ariel’s corporate headquarters in Mulhouse, France. The previous week, Martin had requested additional financial information about an investment proposal from Ariel-Mexico, a wholly owned subsidiary that operated a manufacturing facility and a regional sales office in Monterrey, Mexico. The information had arrived late Friday—too late for Martin to analyze—and was waiting for him Monday morning. As a financial analyst for a global manufacturer of printing and imaging equipment, Martin examined many cross-border projects, particularly
The root cause of Stamypor’s problems was an unstable value proposition (2, p85). DSM-NBD underestimated the value of a need analysis, which was evident from that fact that they skipped the first stage of the Stage-Gate process. This evaluation stage is used to ascertain the need for a new product (1, p9). The omission lead to uncertainties over Stamypor’s claimed ability to add value to the resin industry. Additionally, a significant portion of DSM’s budget was assigned to corporate R&D and not to NBD. Therefore, fundamental research was not involved in the Ideation stage of the Stage-Gate process (3, Figure 5.4). The fact that DSM-NBD went ahead with a sizable investment
Two discounted cash flow analyses accompany this memo. Part A contains an adjustment for possible business erosion at Rotterdam, while part B does not make that adjustment.
We calculated the NPV of the euro investment in two ways. The first was by simply computed by dividing the Peso NPV by the current spot exchange rate. The second method involved using a derivation of the PPP equation to compute the projected future exchange rates. The NPV was calculated after the Cash flows and Net investment were converted to Euros. The value of the Euro Investment was equal in both situations because of the presumption of PPP.
As will be seen below, the cost to manufacture a single unit of the architectural windows is much greater than the standard window (note the negative contribution margin of the architectural windows). This is contrary to the volume-based method where standard windows were more expensive. Under ABC, It makes sense that the architectural window is more expensive as it is generally more labor-intensive, requires more direct material and consumes more fixed resources than its standard window counterpart. ABC is able to capture these costs by tracing the activities to the correct product. The following section will analyze the individual components of the income statement in further detail. What is realized is that cost information is severely distorted under volume-based allocation approach, leading Doug to make uninformed decisions. As it currently stands, architectural windows would be unable to bring the Texas plant into a profitable position.
The present value of all these cash inflows and outflows can be calculated by discounting them at 12.19%. This rate is calculated by assuming that the purchasing power parity holds in this scenario. The company can do the feasibility analysis by looking at both from the subsidiary’s and parent’s perspective by assuming that the purchasing power parity holds. Hence, this rate can be regarded as opportunity cost of investment because it is the second best alternative for the company for investment purposes.
The two plans, Sarnia 1 and Sarnia 2 are producing halobutyl and regular butyl, respectively. The newly regular butyl plant, Sarnia 2, is running at less than capacity. The plant should be able to produce 95,000 tonnes, but the actual production is only 65,000. This creates a lot of unabsorbed fixed costs and inefficiency.
Petrobras’s official monopoly ended in January 2002, when the Brazilian government deregulated domestic prices for crude oil and oil products. Petrobras’s first discoveries were made onshore in the Northeast of Brazil in the 1950s and 1960s. In the mid 1980s, when the giant deepwater pools in the Campos Basin were discovered and developed, the profile of the company started to shift upstream toward exploration, development, and production.
The machine will have a depreciation of $140,000 for the first five years; this is determined by dividing the initial investment by five. The old machine will be sold in 2010 for $25,000 which is below the current book value of $36,000. This is why there is a capital gain of $3,850 that will add to the incremental savings plus the depreciation for that year. The new sheeter will be sold at the end of the last year for $120,000 which will be taxed at 35; this is why a cost of $42,000 appears for the last cash flow (Exhibit 1). The NPV is a positive $1,063,567 and the IRR is 36%, this shows that the project will add value to the company along with having a great return. The payback period for the project is 2.45…Using the growth rate of 3%, the sales are projected to be nearly doubled from 2009 with the new sheeter. However, Pitts believes that he would not be surprised to see them increase by 7% or
with a number of strategic issues facing a capital-intensive, mature industry. Their product costing system was
However, MacDowell Corporation believes that changing the relationship with San Fabian Supply Company will make it benefit more. On one hand, MacDowell has been marketing its products through an exclusive distributor only in the Philippines and the parent company wants to market the products same as in other countries. On the other hand, the demand for construction materials has decreased since the expansion of its plant in the Philippines before. MacDowell Philippines’ plant operating rate was very low, at only about 45% capacity, and the overcapacity plagued the company a lot. To get rid of this situation, MacDowell Philippines wants to increase sales and its new president believes that having more dealers can lead to more sales. So MacDowell wants to change the relationship with San Fabian Company in the