Analysis Of Oedipus The King

Oedipus steps out of the royal palace of Thebes and is greeted by a procession of priests, who are in turn surrounded by the impoverished and sorrowful citizens of Thebes. The citizens carry branches wrapped in wool, which they offer to the gods as gifts. Thebes has been struck by a plague, the citizens are dying, and no one knows how to put an end to it. Oedipus asks a priest why the citizens have gathered around the palace. The priest responds that the city is dying and asks the king to save Thebes. Oedipus replies that he sees and understands the terrible fate of Thebes, and that no one is more sorrowful than he. He has sent Creon, his brother-in-law and fellow ruler, to the Delphic oracle to find out how to stop the plague. Just then, Creon

In Oedipus the King, Sophocles uses his protagonist, Oedipus, to explore his pursuit of knowledge, which leads to his tragic destruction. Oedipus is a favorable king who is determined to end the curse that has been brought upon the city because the murderer of his predecessor, Laius, still lies in the city. Ironically, Oedipus delivers the curse to the city because he murdered his father, Laius. Oedipus’s desire to gain knowledge and bring the murderer of Laius to justice, results in his downfall, which causes the people around him to be greatly affected as well.

The theme of sight and blindness is undoubtedly important to notice while reading Oedipus the King. The number of times the words “see” or “blind” are in the play make it make it undeniably obvious that they are significant. The theme is developed throughout the dialogue, through characters such as Tiresias and Oedipus, and also directly in the irony of the play. It is important in a play about the truth because almost every character was “blind” to the truth. All of the characters, except one, can physically see, but mentally cannot see the truth.

This triggered his frustrating, inequitable fate to arise, which made him fit Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero. Oedipus’ only problem wasn’t just that he couldn’t control his temper; he also was full of himself, in other words, Hubris. Hubris is a tragic flaw in which he or she has excessive pride. When Oedipus believed he could overcome fate, he showed excessive pride when he commented, “Ah! Why should a man respect the Pythian hearth, or give heed to the birds that jangle above his head?” (50). He thought he overcame his fate when Polybos died, so he said there is no reason to follow or believe any of it. Greeks, like Aristotle, believe fate is unavoidable and it can’t be changed; so, when Oedipus truly believed he could defy his prophecy, that was highly frowned upon. Oedipus’ fate consisted of killing his father and marrying his mother subsequently having kids with her. On his way to Thebes, he killed King Laius out of rage at the crossroads and all of the witnesses except for one, who got away. Not thinking anything of it, he takes over the throne after defeating the Sphinx and marries Jocasta, who bore his four children. If Oedipus was smart, to avoid his fate, he could have just never wed or kill anyone; his fate couldn’t have been avoided because of his temper and just plain stupidity. Hamartia is the tragic flaw which causes the downfall. Oedipus showed no control when

Sophocles' play Oedipus the King has endured for over two thousand years. The play's lasting appeal may be attributed to the fact it encompasses all the classical elements of tragedy as put forth by Aristotle in Poetics nearly a century before it was written. According to Aristotle, tragedy needs to be an imitation of life according to the law of probability or necessity. Tragedy is serious, complete, and has magnitude. It must have a beginning, middle, and end and be spoken in language that is fit for noble characters. Furthermore it must be acted, as opposed to epic poetry, which is narrated. Tragedy shows rather than tells. Finally it must result in the purging of pity and fear, or a catharsis. Tragedy is based in the fundamental order of the universe, it creates a cause-and-effect chain that clearly reveals what may happen at any time or place because that is the way the world operates. Tragedy arouses not only pity but also fear, because the audience can envision themselves within this cause-and-effect chain. Tragedy as a whole is composed of six elements: plot, character, language, thought, spectacle and melody. Melody and language are the media by which the effect of imitation of action is carried out, spectacle is the manner or way the tragedy is carried out, and plot, character and thought are the means that initiate the action. Oedipus the King possesses all of these elements.

Ancient Greece is a very unique and foreign place to us today but surprisingly the ancient Greeks liked theatrics as much as we do now. This love for the stage led to many great plays being written one of which was “Oedipus the King”. “Oedipus the King” written by Sophocles in 430 BC is a Greek tragedy that shows the tragic downfall of Oedipus the king of Thebes. In this play Oedipus finds out that the prophecy that he had fled from so long ago had come true as he married his mother and murdered his father. “Oedipus the King” is a brilliant allegory for man's unwinnable struggle against fate and the puzzling actions of the indifferent gods.

Getting out of the bed in the morning is always hard, especially when one doesn 't want to. It 's your bubble and the longer you stay there, the harder it is to leave, yet you can 't see the wonders of the world from inside that safe space. One would be blind to the truth, they would be living a false life, one deprived of the truth they can not see. Exactly how Oedipus was in Oedipus the king, where Oedipus was blind to see his truth from his ignorance of not knowing what he was missing from his life, but is finding the truth, really worth it?

Oedipus is a man of unflagging determination and perseverance, but one who must learn through the working out of a terrible prophecy that there are forces beyond any man’s conceptualization or control. Oedipus’ actions were determined before his birth, yet Oedipus’ actions are entirely determined by the Gods who control him completely. In the beginning of this tragedy, Oedipus took many actions leading to his own downfall. He tried to escape Corinth when he learned of the prophecies that were supposed to take place in his life. Instead, he

Oedipus the King conveys the moral lesson of the catastrophe that results when human determination struggles to change fate. Humans are mortals, not always strong, and are fallible; the gods are not mortal, always strong, and are infallible. These differences plainly collide when Jocasta and Oedipus attempt to avoid their fates- what the “gods themselves have decreed.” Oedipus and Jocasta should have just submitted and not have had so much confidence in themselves; but, they are human, and could not change that which is predetermined. Thus, to the people of Thebes, their actions were blasphemous and offensive to the gods.

Can we assure ourselves that we know what fate really is? The question of whether fate was predetermined by the Greek gods when one was born, or could the individual choose their fate, is debateable. In both tragedy plays, Agamemnon and Oedipus the King, the oracles indicated that the fate of Agamemnon and Oedipus was ordained. However, we cannot put all liability on the gods. The path that they have decided to take with the decisions that they made, partially led to their downfall. Therefore, they should’ve personally taken responsibility for fulfilling their prophecy.

In his essay, “Introduction to Oedipus the King”, Bernard Knox supports free will by stating that Oedipus’ downfall was not caused by fate. According to Knox there is not a doubt that, “Oedipus is the free agent who, by his own self-willed action, discovers that his own predicted destiny has already been fulfilled” (86). He clearly states that Oedipus is responsible for his free actions during the play. He insists that Oedipus’s made the decisions to discover the truth about himself.

The tale of Oedipus and his prophecy has intrigued not only the citizens of Greece in the ancient times, but also people all over the world for several generations. Most notable about the play was its peculiar structure, causing the audience to think analytically about the outcomes of Oedipus’ actions and how it compares with Aristotle’s beliefs. Another way that the people have examined the drama is by looking at the paradoxes (such as the confrontation of Tiresias and Oedipus), symbols (such as the Sphinx), and morals that has affected their perceptions by the end of the play. Nonetheless, the most important aspect is how relevant the story is and how it has influenced modern ideas like that of Freud and other people of today.

In the greek drama, Oedipus the king by Sophocles, King Oedipus shows all the characteristics of a tragic hero. By definition A tragic hero is, “A privileged, exalted character of high repute, who by virtue of a tragic flaw and fate suffers a fall from glory into suffering”. That definition perfectly describes Oedipus and his life. Throughout this whole story we see the real Oedipus emerge. Oedipus starts out in the beginning by being the best king around but by the end of the story we see the ups and downs of his life and how it changed forever. In the story we here Oedipus say these words, “ah! My poor children, known, ah known too well, the quest that brings

"Oedipus the King" is a tragic play showing a shift from the belief of fate to freedom of choice. Therefore, Oedipus the king is a great example of those who run from fate ends up fulfilling their fate

Oedipus the King is a Greek tragedy play written by Sophocles, and it made its first debut